T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution
EnterpriseAdversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code. Vulnerabilities can exist in software due to unsecure coding practices that can lead to unanticipated behavior. Adversaries can take advantage of certain vulnerabilities through targeted exploitation for the purpose of arbitrary code execution. Oftentimes the most valuable exploits to an offensive toolkit are those that can be used to obtain code execution on a remote system because they can be used to gain access to that system. Users will expect to see files related to the applications they commonly used to do work, so they are a useful target for exploit research and development because of their high utility. Several types exist: ### Browser-based Exploitation Web browsers are a common target through Drive-by Compromise and Spearphishing Link. Endpoint systems may be compromised through normal web browsing or from certain users being targeted by links in spearphishing emails to adversary controlled sites used to exploit the web browser. These often do not require an action by the user for the exploit to be executed. ### Office Applications Common office and productivity applications such as Microsoft Office are also targeted through Phishing. Malicious files will be transmitted directly as attachments or through links to download them. These require the user to open the document or file for the exploit to run. ### Common Third-party Applications Other applications that are commonly seen or are part of the software deployed in a target network may also be used for exploitation. Applications such as Adobe Reader and Flash, which are common in enterprise environments, have been routinely targeted by adversaries attempting to gain access to systems. Depending on the software and nature of the vulnerability, some may be exploited in the browser or require the user to open a file. For instance, some Flash exploits have been delivered as objects within Microsoft Office documents.
platforms
Platforms this applies to.
tactics
ATT&CK tactics this technique serves.
mitigations
ATT&CK mitigations that reduce this.
detected by (7)
Data components that detect this.
countered by (D3FEND)
D3FEND countermeasures that counter this.
Harden
NIST CSF 2.0 — areas of relevance (Protect / Detect)
NIST CSF 2.0 areas this most relates to (evidence-ranked).
- PR.DSData Securitymoderate · backed by 6 of 16 mapped controls
- DE.CMContinuous Monitoringmoderate · backed by 5 of 16 mapped controls
- ID.IMImprovementweak · backed by 3 of 16 mapped controls
Derived from MITRE CTID (Apache-2.0) and the NIST 800-53 ↔ CSF crosswalk (public domain). Indicative relevance along the Protect/Detect axis — not a compliance assessment or coverage claim.
mitigating controls (16)
Security controls that mitigate this.
known-exploited CVEs (43)
Related CVEs.
| ID | severity | exploitable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-6558US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE and GPU in Google Chrome prior to 138.0.7204.157 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted… | ||||
| CVE-2025-6554US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 138.0.7204.96 allowed a remote attacker to perform arbitrary read/write via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2025-6543US | critical9.8OT critical | KEV | ||
Memory overflow vulnerability leading to unintended control flow and Denial of Service in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as Gateway (VPN virtual server, ICA Pr… | ||||
| CVE-2025-43200US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
This issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 15.8.4 and iPadOS 15.8.4, iOS 16.7.11 and iPadOS 16.7.11, iOS 18.3.1 and iPadOS 18.3.1, iPadOS 17.7.5, mac… | ||||
| CVE-2025-27038US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Memory corruption while rendering graphics using Adreno GPU drivers in Chrome. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5419US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 137.0.7151.68 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium secur… | ||||
| CVE-2025-30397US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Scripting Engine allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4427US | high7.5OT critical | KEV | ||
An authentication bypass in the API component of Ivanti Endpoint Manager Mobile 12.5.0.0 and prior allows attackers to access protected resources without proper credentials via the… | ||||
| CVE-2025-42999US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer Metadata Uploader is vulnerable when a privileged user can upload untrusted or malicious content which, when deserialized, could potentially lead to a… | ||||
| CVE-2025-3935US | high7.2OT critical | KEV | ||
ScreenConnect versions 25.2.3 and earlier versions may be susceptible to a ViewState code injection attack. ASP.NET Web Forms use ViewState to preserve page and control state, with… | ||||
| CVE-2025-31201US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4.1 and iPadOS 18.4.1, macOS Sequoia 15.4.1, tvOS 18.4.1, visionOS 2.4.1. An attacker with a… | ||||
| CVE-2025-31200US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4.1 and iPadOS 18.4.1, macOS Sequoia 15.4.1, tvOS 18.4.1, visionOS 2.4.1, watch… | ||||
| CVE-2025-3248US | critical9.8OT critical | KEV | ||
Langflow versions prior to 1.3.0 are susceptible to code injection in
the /api/v1/validate/code endpoint. A remote and unauthenticated attacker can send crafted HTTP requests to e… | ||||
| CVE-2025-30406US | critical9.8OT critical | KEV | ||
Gladinet CentreStack through 16.1.10296.56315 (fixed in 16.4.10315.56368) has a deserialization vulnerability due to the CentreStack portal's hardcoded machineKey use, as exploited… | ||||
| CVE-2025-2783US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Incorrect handle provided in unspecified circumstances in Mojo in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 134.0.6998.177 allowed a remote attacker to perform a sandbox escape via a malic… | ||||
| CVE-2025-24993US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows NTFS allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24016US | —OT critical | KEV | ||
Wazuh is a free and open source platform used for threat prevention, detection, and response. Starting in version 4.4.0 and prior to version 4.9.1, an unsafe deserialization vulner… | ||||
| CVE-2024-11120US | critical9.8OT critical | KEV | ||
Certain EOL GeoVision devices have an OS Command Injection vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to inject and execute arbitrary system com… | ||||
| CVE-2024-45195US | high7.5OT critical | KEV | ||
Direct Request ('Forced Browsing') vulnerability in Apache OFBiz.
This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.16.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 18.12.16, which fi… | ||||
| CVE-2024-5274US | critical9.6OT critical | KEV | ||
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 125.0.6422.112 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security sever… | ||||
groups (42)
Threat groups associated with this.
software (14)
Malware and tools associated with this.
campaigns (5)
Campaigns that use this.
Detected by (Sigma) (35)
Sigma detection rules related to this.
source
Where this definition is published.