CVE-2026-89087

highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.003 · 25 %ileUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.32% (25th) EPSS
CVSS 7.3 · high
Is it mine?
1 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
1 sources
osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

The cstruct package before 6.3.0 for OCaml mishandles indexes.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.3
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 6.7–7.3

v3.17.3highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Lsecondary · cve@mitre.org USexploitability 3.9 · impact 3.4
v3.17.3highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v3.16.7mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (1)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • OSEC-2026-20Cstruct indexing bugs can corrupt filtered output and reverse parsing results2026-09-10vendor · osvUS

    Several functions in cstruct may use wrong data, leading to unexpected exceptions and return corrupted data. ## Impact - `Cstruct.filter_map` writes retained bytes at their original input positions, producing corrupted output when earlier bytes are dropped. - `Cstruct.tail ~rev:true` removes two bytes instead of one and raises an exception for single-byte views. - `Cstruct.cuts ~rev:true` may compare input against the wrong data, split at incorrect positions, and construct results using offsets outside the requested view. - `Cstruct.find` and `Cstruct.find_sub ~rev:true` may return slices from the wrong location when operating on non-zero-offset views. These are a set of logical indexing and bounds-calculation errors (CWE-682), and not direct memory-safety vulnerabilities. However, affected operations may return corrupted data, raise an unexpected exception, split input incorrectly, or return bytes outside the requested Cstruct view but still within its backing buffer. In security-sensitive parsers, this could cause validation bypasses, denial of service, or unintended disclosure of adjacent buffer contents. ## Workarounds Users unable to upgrade cstruct should backport the corresponding source changes. There is no configuration-based mitigation since these are buggy library calls. ## References Discovered via [Scrutineer](https://github.com/alpha-omega-security/scrutineer) and Deepseek GLM-5.3 Flash running locally. ## Timeline - 2026-09-04: reported via GitHub to ocaml/security-advisories repository - 2026-09-05: reported via email to security@ocaml.org - 2026-09-05: patch proposed and reviewed - 2026-09-05: release cstruct 6.3.0 - 2026-09-10: published advisory

06

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-09-10modified 2026-09-22
07

references (1) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan