CVE-2026-84377

mediumpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.005 · 45 %ileUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.54% (45th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
9 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
1 sources
osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-26

LiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. Prior to versions 1.88.6 and 1.96.2, any authenticated LiteLLM proxy user could redirect an outbound provider call to a destination the user controls and cause the proxy to send its configured provider credentials to that destination. Request validation in litellm/proxy/auth/auth_utils.py, litellm/proxy/common_request_processing.py, litellm/proxy/health_endpoints/_health_endpoints.py, litellm/proxy/image_endpoints/endpoints.py, and litellm/proxy/litellm_pre_call_utils.py used incomplete checks that did not cover every sensitive parameter or inspect equivalent values across nested request fields, path values, and bracket-notation form data. Routing and credential parameters including api_base, base_url, model_list, fallbacks, and litellm_credential_name could therefore be applied without clearing the operator's stored key, exposing upstream provider credentials and other configured secrets and permitting server-side requests to internal services reachable by the proxy. This issue is fixed in versions 1.88.6 and 1.96.2.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

6.5
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 3.6
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (9)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-3cv6-jpf6-8222LiteLLM: Authenticated SSRF and provider-credential exfiltration via unvalidated request-body routing parameters2026-09-30ghsa · osvUS

    ### Impact Any authenticated LiteLLM proxy user could redirect an outbound provider call to a destination they control and cause the proxy to send its own configured provider credentials to that destination. The proxy's request-body validation was a denylist that did not cover every sensitive parameter and did not inspect parameters nested inside other request fields, so a caller could supply a routing or credential value that the proxy applied without clearing the operator's stored key. Any authenticated user could therefore exfiltrate the operator's upstream provider credentials and other configured secrets, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery against internal services reachable from the proxy. ### Patches Fixed in 1.96.2, 1.95.1, 1.94.3, 1.93.2, 1.92.2, 1.91.5, 1.90.7, 1.89.7, and 1.88.6. ### Workarounds Set `general_settings.allow_client_side_credentials` to `false` so callers cannot override connection parameters, restrict proxy keys to trusted callers, and block the affected parameters (`api_base`, `base_url`, `model_list`, `fallbacks`, provider credential fields) at a reverse proxy or API gateway.

  • PYSEC-2026-4066LiteLLM: Authenticated SSRF and provider-credential exfiltration via unvalidated request-body routing parameters2026-10-01vendor · osvUS

    ### Impact Any authenticated LiteLLM proxy user could redirect an outbound provider call to a destination they control and cause the proxy to send its own configured provider credentials to that destination. The proxy's request-body validation was a denylist that did not cover every sensitive parameter and did not inspect parameters nested inside other request fields, so a caller could supply a routing or credential value that the proxy applied without clearing the operator's stored key. Any authenticated user could therefore exfiltrate the operator's upstream provider credentials and other configured secrets, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery against internal services reachable from the proxy. ### Patches Fixed in 1.96.2, 1.95.1, 1.94.3, 1.93.2, 1.92.2, 1.91.5, 1.90.7, 1.89.7, and 1.88.6. ### Workarounds Set `general_settings.allow_client_side_credentials` to `false` so callers cannot override connection parameters, restrict proxy keys to trusted callers, and block the affected parameters (`api_base`, `base_url`, `model_list`, `fallbacks`, provider credential fields) at a reverse proxy or API gateway.

06

also known as (2)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-09-02modified 2026-09-03
08

references (9) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan