CVE-2026-79783
lowpriority · track · 14EPSS 0.002 · 13 %ileUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
rclone before 1.74.4 fails to mask special permission bits when applying source-supplied mode metadata in the local backend, allowing attackers to set setuid/setgid bits on attacker-controlled files. When copying with metadata preservation from an untrusted remote, attackers can plant a setuid binary that escalates privileges to root if rclone runs as root, or to the service account user otherwise.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (2)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (3)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-945v-v9p3-v5xwrclone local `--metadata` applies attacker-controlled mode/uid - setuid binary planted from an untrusted remote2026-08-05ghsa · osvUS
### Summary When writing an object with metadata, the local backend applies the source-supplied `mode`, `uid`, and `gid` verbatim: it parses `mode` as an octal integer and passes it straight into `os.Chmod(o.path, os.FileMode(umode))`, and passes `uid`/`gid` straight into `os.Chown`. The value is never masked to permission bits, so any value with Go's `ModeSetuid` (1<<23) or `ModeSetgid` (1<<22) bit set causes the setuid/setgid bit to be applied. Because both the file content and its metadata come from the (attacker-controlled) source remote, an attacker stores a binary of their choosing with `mode = 40000755` (and `uid = 0`); when the victim runs `rclone copy -M <remote>: /dest`, rclone writes the attacker's binary and makes it setuid. If the victim runs rclone as root (typical for system backup/restore), the `uid=0` chown plus setuid produces a root-owned setuid binary with attacker content — any local user then escalates to root. When rclone runs as a non-root service user, the planted setuid binary is owned by that user, giving any local user that user's privileges (lateral escalation / persistent backdoor). ### Details `backend/local/metadata.go`, `writeMetadataToFile()`: ```go uid, hasUID := o.parseMetadataInt(m, "uid", 10) gid, hasGID := o.parseMetadataInt(m, "gid", 10) if hasUID { ... err = os.Chown(o.path, uid, gid) // source-controlled owner, no same-uid guard } mode, hasMode := o.parseMetadataInt(m, "mode", 8) if hasMode && mode >= 0 { umode := uint(mode) if umode <= math.MaxUint32 { err = os.Chmod(o.path, os.FileMode(umode)) // <-- raw value; ModeSetuid/ModeSetgid NOT masked off } } ``` `os.Chmod`/`os.FileMode` honor `ModeSetuid`/`ModeSetgid`/`ModeSticky`. There is no `&^ (os.ModeSetuid|os.ModeSetgid)` mask and no check that the source is trusted, so an attacker-chosen `mode` string sets those bits on the freshly written, attacker-controlled file. (Note: a legitimate local source reports `mode` in unix `st_mode` layout e.g. `0106755`, whose bit 1<<23 is unset, so honest copies happen to drop setuid — but the attacker supplies the Go-`FileMode` layout `40000755` directly, which sets it.) ### PoC 1) Get the official stable binary: ``` curl -fsSLO https://downloads.rclone.org/v1.74.3/rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip unzip -j rclone-v1.74.3-linux-amd64.zip '*/rclone' -d . # ./rclone -> v1.74.3 ``` 2) Create a payload (the attacker-controlled binary content) and copy it with the malicious `mode` metadata: ``` mkdir -p msrc mdst && cp /bin/true msrc/payload ./rclone copy -M --metadata-set mode=40000755 msrc mdst # 40000755 = Go FileMode setuid|0755 ``` 3) Observe — the destination file is now setuid: ``` stat -c '%A %a' mdst/payload -rwsr-xr-x 4755 # 's' = setuid bit SET on attacker binary ``` Variants: `mode=20000755` → setgid (`-rwxr-sr-x`); `mode=60000755` → both (`-rwsr-sr-x`). With rclone run as root and the source object also carrying `uid=0`/`gid=0`, the file is chown'd root:root, yielding a root-owned setuid binary executable by any local user. ### Impact A victim performing a metadata-preserving copy/restore (`-M`) from an untrusted or compromised remote installs an attacker-chosen executable with the setuid/setgid bit set. Run as root (system backup/restore, the common case for `--metadata`), this is a root-owned setuid root backdoor executable by any local user → local privilege escalation to root. Run as a non-root user, it is a setuid backdoor for that service account. The companion `uid`/`gid` application lets a root-run transfer also reassign ownership of written files arbitrarily. ### Remediation Mask special bits before applying mode from metadata — `os.Chmod(o.path, os.FileMode(umode).Perm())` (or `umode & 0o777`) — and do not honor setuid/setgid/sticky from source metadata; gate `uid`/`gid`/setuid application behind an explicit opt-in (e.g. `--local-metadata-set-ownership`) that is off by default, and document that `-M` from untrusted remotes must not restore privileged bits. Regression test: copying an object with `mode=40000755`/`uid=0` must produce a non-setuid, caller-owned file unless the opt-in is set.
- BIT-rclone-2026-79783rclone before 1.74.4 Privilege Escalation via setuid Metadata2026-09-25vendor · osvUS
rclone before 1.74.4 fails to mask special permission bits when applying source-supplied mode metadata in the local backend, allowing attackers to set setuid/setgid bits on attacker-controlled files. When copying with metadata preservation from an untrusted remote, attackers can plant a setuid binary that escalates privileges to root if rclone runs as root, or to the service account user otherwise.
- GO-2026-6190Unsafe file permission restoration from metadata in github.com/rclone/rclone2026-08-18vendor · osvUS
Unsafe file permission restoration from metadata in github.com/rclone/rclone
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
- BIT-rclone-2026-79783osv
- GHSA-945v-v9p3-v5xwosv
- GO-2026-6190osv
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (2) nvd
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan