CVE-2026-6966
mediumpriority · track · 26EPSS 0.003 · 21 %ileEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-26
Improper verification of cryptographic signature uniqueness in delegated role validation in awslabs/tough before tough-v0.22.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass the TUF signature threshold requirement by duplicating a valid signature, causing the client to accept forged delegated role metadata. We recommend you upgrade to tough-v0.22.0 / tuftool-v0.15.0.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–high · 3.8–7
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (4)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (1)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-8m7c-8m39-rv4xawslabs/tough Delegated Roles have a Signature Threshold Bypass2026-05-05ghsa · osvUS
### Summary Improper verification of cryptographic signature uniqueness in delegated role validation in awslabs/tough before tough-v0.22.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass the TUF signature threshold requirement by duplicating a valid signature, causing the client to accept forged delegated role metadata. ### Impact The tough library, prior to 0.22.0, does not properly verify the uniqueness of keys in the signatures provided to meet the threshold of cryptographic signatures in delegated targets. It allows actors with access to a valid signing key to create multiple valid signatures in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum threshold of unique keys before the metadata is considered valid. ### Patches This issue has been addressed in tough version 0.22.0 and tuftool version 0.15.0. We recommend upgrading to the latest version and ensuring any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes. ### Workarounds No workarounds to this issue are known. ### References * CVE-2026-6966 If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please contact [AWS/Amazon] Security via the [vulnerability reporting page](https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting) or directly via email to [aws-security@amazon.com](mailto:aws-security@amazon.com). Please do not create a public GitHub issue. ### Acknowledgement Amazon Web Services Labs would like to thank Emily Albini of Oxide Computer and Oleh Konko of 1seal for collaborating on this issue through the coordinated vulnerability disclosure process
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (14)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/awslabs/tough/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6966cnnvd
- https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/2026-019-aws/enisa_euvd
- https://crates.io/crates/tough/0.22.0enisa_euvd
- https://crates.io/crates/tuftool/0.15.0enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/awslabs/tough/releases/tag/tough-v0.22.0enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/awslabs/tough/releases/tag/tuftool-v0.15.0enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/awslabs/tough/security/advisories/GHSA-8m7c-8m39-rv4xenisa_euvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan