CVE-2026-54722
highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.006 · 47 %ileEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
DSSRF is a Node.js library that provides a wide range of utilities and advanced SSRF defense checks. Prior to 1.0.4, is_url_safe in src/helpers.ts strips the @ userinfo delimiter with remove_at_symbol_in_string before new URL parses the URL, allowing an attacker-controlled URL to bypass internal-IP validation and cause a client using the original URL to reach an internal service. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.4.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 6.6–8.7
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (2)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (1)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2dssrf has an SSRF bypass with remove_at_symbol_in_string2026-07-30ghsa · osvUS
## Summary `is_url_safe` in v1.0.3 contains an SSRF bypass. `remove_at_symbol_in_string` is applied to the raw URL string **before** `new URL()` parses it. This strips the `@` that separates userinfo from host, corrupting the hostname so internal IPs are never checked. ## Vulnerability In `helpers.ts`, `is_url_safe` does: ```ts u = remove_at_symbol_in_string(u); // strips ALL '@' from the raw string // ... const parsed = new URL(u); const hostname = parsed.hostname; // resolved from the corrupted string ``` ### What happens step by step Input: `http://evil.com@127.0.0.1/` 1. `remove_at_symbol_in_string` → `http://evil.com127.0.0.1/` 2. `new URL(...)` → `hostname = "evil.com127.0.0.1"` 3. Not a bare IP, not IPv6 → passes all IP checks 4. `is_hostname_resolve_to_internal_ip("evil.com127.0.0.1")` → NXDOMAIN → returns false 5. **Result: `true` (safe)** — but any HTTP client using the *original* URL connects to `127.0.0.1` ### Proof of Concept ```js import nock from 'nock'; import { got } from 'got'; import { is_url_safe } from 'dssrf'; // Simulate an internal server at 10.0.0.1 that returns secret data nock('http://10.0.0.1:80').persist().get('/').reply(200, 'SECRET_DATA'); const BYPASS_URL = 'http://2@10.0.0.1/'; const PLAIN_URL = 'http://10.0.0.1/'; // dssrf should block both — it only blocks the plain one console.log('--- dssrf validator ---'); console.log(`is_url_safe('${PLAIN_URL}') =`, await is_url_safe(PLAIN_URL), '← correctly blocked'); console.log(`is_url_safe('${BYPASS_URL}') =`, await is_url_safe(BYPASS_URL), '← ⚠️ BYPASSED (should be false)'); // HTTP client with the bypass URL — gets SECRET_DATA back from 10.0.0.1 console.log('\n--- HTTP client ---'); try { const res = await got(BYPASS_URL, { retry: { limit: 0 } }); console.log(`got('${BYPASS_URL}') response:`, res.body, '← ⚠️ VULNERABLE'); } catch (e) { console.log(`got('${BYPASS_URL}') blocked:`, e.message); } ``` ## Root Cause `@` in a URL separates `userinfo` (credentials) from `host`. Stripping it from the raw string before parsing destroys that boundary. The fix is to **reject any URL that contains a userinfo component** after parsing. ## Suggested Fix Remove the `remove_at_symbol_in_string` call from `is_url_safe` and add a userinfo check after `new URL()`: ```ts const parsed = new URL(u); // Reject userinfo — '@' in authority is a classic SSRF bypass vector if (parsed.username !== "" || parsed.password !== "") { return false; } ``` A working patch verified against 15 vectors (all internal IPv4 ranges, IMDS, IPv6 via userinfo, and legitimate public URLs) is ready to submit as a PR. ## Impact - **Affected version**: 1.0.3 (latest) - **Bypasses**: all internal IPv4 ranges, IPv6 loopback/ULA/link-local, AWS IMDS (`169.254.169.254`), any internal hostname via userinfo prefix - **Note**: The GHSA-8p33-q827-ghj5 advisory patched version (`1.0.3`) should be updated since this vector was not covered by that fix Users are strongly advised to upgrade to dssrf 1.0.4
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (12)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/commit/9211f91bf532433a1a1b27d946571546a63664b3cnnvd
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/issues/97cnnvd
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/pull/98cnnvd
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/security/advisories/GHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2cnnvd
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/commit/9211f91bf532433a1a1b27d946571546a63664b3enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/issues/97enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/pull/98enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/HackingRepo/dssrf-js/security/advisories/GHSA-cg4g-m8jx-vjv2enisa_euvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan