CVE-2026-54351

criticalpriority · track · 38EPSS 0.005 · 40 %ileDEEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.46% (40th) EPSS
CVSS 9.6 · critical
Is it mine?
5 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · cert_bund · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.39.9, the webhook trigger endpoint in Budibase is publicly accessible and passes the full HTTP request body into automation execution parameters. A mass assignment vulnerability in externalTrigger() allows an attacker to overwrite the internal appId property by including it in the webhook POST body. When the automation is processed asynchronously (the default path for webhooks without a collect step), the worker executes the attacker-defined automation in the context of the victim's workspace, granting full read/write access to the victim's database. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.39.9.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

9.6
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · high–critical · 8.2–9.6

v3.19.6criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.1 · impact 5.8
v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 1.8 · impact 5.8
v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (5)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • WID-SEC-W-2026-1806Budibase: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-06-04csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Budibase ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, und um Dateien zu manipulieren.

  • GHSA-rgvg-3wpc-h44pBudibase: Mass Assignment in Webhook Trigger Allows Cross-Workspace Automation Execution via appId Override2026-06-22ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary The webhook trigger endpoint in Budibase is publicly accessible and passes the full HTTP request body into automation execution parameters. A mass assignment vulnerability in `externalTrigger()` allows an attacker to overwrite the internal `appId` property by including it in the webhook POST body. When the automation is processed asynchronously (the default path for webhooks without a collect step), the worker executes the attacker-defined automation in the context of the victim's workspace, granting full read/write access to the victim's database. ## Details The webhook trigger route is registered as a public endpoint with no authentication: ```typescript // packages/server/src/api/routes/webhook.ts:12 publicRoutes.post("/api/webhooks/trigger/:instance/:id", controller.trigger) ``` The controller passes the raw request body as `fields` alongside the server-derived `appId`: ```typescript // packages/server/src/api/controllers/webhook.ts:142-148 await triggers.externalTrigger(target, { fields: { ...ctx.request.body, // attacker-controlled body: ctx.request.body, }, appId: prodAppId, // server-controlled }) ``` In `externalTrigger()`, for webhook-triggered automations, `params.fields` is spread back into `params`: ```typescript // packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:237-241 params = { ...params, // appId: prodAppId (server-controlled) ...params.fields, // appId: VICTIM_ID (attacker-controlled, overwrites above) fields: {}, } ``` Because `params.fields` is spread **after** `params`, any key in the attacker's body overwrites the corresponding property in `params`. An attacker including `"appId": "app_VICTIM_WORKSPACE_ID"` in the POST body overwrites the legitimate, server-derived `appId`. The contaminated params become `data.event` and are queued asynchronously: ```typescript // packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:244,271 const data: AutomationData = { automation, event: params } // ... return quotas.addAction(() => automationQueue.add(data, JOB_OPTS)) ``` The async worker uses `job.data.event.appId` to set the workspace context: ```typescript // packages/server/src/threads/automation.ts:917,929-930 const workspaceId = job.data.event.appId // attacker-controlled // ... return await context.doInAutomationContext({ workspaceId, // victim's workspace automationId, task: async () => { /* automation steps run here */ } }) ``` The synchronous path (for webhooks with a collect step) correctly overwrites `appId` at `triggers.ts:264`: ```typescript data.event = { ...data.event, appId: context.getWorkspaceId(), // server-controlled fix automation, } ``` This proves the developers intended `appId` to be server-controlled but missed applying the same fix to the async path, which is the default for all webhooks without a collect step. ## PoC **Prerequisites:** Attacker has builder access to their own Budibase workspace and knows a victim workspace ID (format: `app_<uuid>`). **Step 1:** Attacker creates an automation in their own workspace with a webhook trigger and data-exfiltration steps (e.g., Query Rows → Execute Script to send data externally). **Step 2:** Attacker creates a webhook for that automation and notes the webhook URL: ``` POST /api/webhooks/trigger/<ATTACKER_INSTANCE>/<WEBHOOK_ID> ``` **Step 3:** Attacker triggers the webhook with the victim's workspace ID injected into the body: ```bash curl -X POST https://budibase.example.com/api/webhooks/trigger/app_ATTACKER_ID/wh_WEBHOOK_ID \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"appId": "app_VICTIM_WORKSPACE_ID", "normalData": "test"}' ``` **Expected result:** The automation defined in the attacker's workspace executes in the context of the victim's workspace. All database operations (Query Rows, Create Row, Delete Row, Execute Script, etc.) operate on the victim's data. **Additional overridable fields via the same mechanism:** - `timeout` (`automation.ts:443-444`): override automation execution timeout - `user` (`automation.ts:413,435`): set user context for automation steps - `metadata.automationChainCount` (`automation.ts:293`): bypass chain depth limits ## Impact An attacker with builder access to their own Budibase workspace can execute arbitrary automations (of their own design) in the context of any other workspace on the same Budibase instance, provided they know the victim's workspace ID. This enables: - **Full data exfiltration**: Query Rows steps read all tables in the victim's workspace - **Data manipulation**: Create Row, Update Row, Delete Row steps modify victim data - **Arbitrary code execution in victim context**: Execute Script steps run JavaScript with access to victim's environment variables and database - **Cross-tenant boundary violation**: In multi-tenant deployments (Budibase Cloud), the tenant ID is derived from the workspace ID, so the attack crosses tenant boundaries The attack requires no authentication (the webhook endpoint is public) and leaves minimal audit trail since the automation execution is attributed to the attacker's automation definition but runs in the victim's context. ## Recommended Fix In `packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts`, apply the same `appId` fix that exists in the synchronous path to the async path as well. The fix should ensure `appId` is always server-controlled before queuing: ```typescript // packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:244-272 const data: AutomationData = { automation, event: params } // ... trigger filter check ... + // Ensure appId is always server-controlled, not user-supplied + data.event.appId = context.getWorkspaceId() if (getResponses) { data.event = { ...data.event, appId: context.getWorkspaceId(), automation, } return quotas.addAction(() => executeInThread({ data } as AutomationJob, { onProgress }) ) } else { return quotas.addAction(() => automationQueue.add(data, JOB_OPTS)) } ``` Alternatively, use an allowlist approach for the webhook field spread to prevent any internal property from being overwritten: ```typescript // packages/server/src/automations/triggers.ts:237-241 const { appId, timeout, user, metadata, ...safeFields } = params.fields params = { ...params, ...safeFields, fields: {}, } ```

06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-06-26modified 2026-06-30
08

references (3)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan