CVE-2026-53518

highpriority · track · 32OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.004 · 35 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.41% (35th) EPSS
CVSS 8.1 · high
Is it mine?
5 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. From 1.6.0 until 1.6.11, the @better-auth/oauth-provider POST /oauth2/token endpoint for the authorization_code grant redeems a single-use authorization code through a non-atomic find-then-delete sequence, allowing two concurrent requests to pass the read step and mint independent access tokens, refresh tokens, and ID tokens; legacy /oauth2/token and /mcp/token paths in oidc-provider and mcp plugins share the same primitive. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.11.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.1
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 4.9–8.1

v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.8 · impact 5.2
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v4.07.6highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v4.07.6highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · security-advisories@github.com
v4.04.9mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (5)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-7w99-5wm4-3g79@better-auth/oauth-provider's OAuth authorization-code grant allows concurrent redemption when two token requests race the find-then-delete primitive2026-07-07ghsa · osvUS

    ### Am I affected? Users are affected if all of the following are true: - Their project depends on `@better-auth/oauth-provider` at a version `>= 1.6.0, < 1.6.11`, or uses the embedded plugin in `better-auth >= 1.4.8-beta.7, < 1.6.0`, or enables the legacy `oidc-provider` or `mcp` plugins from `better-auth/plugins`. - Their application exposes `/api/auth/oauth2/token` (or the legacy plugins' `/oauth2/token` and `/mcp/token`) as a token endpoint to OAuth/OIDC clients, including internal MCP clients (Claude Desktop, custom MCP tool callers, AI agents). - Their application has not implemented an external mitigation: a load-balancer-level idempotency cache keyed by `code`, a database trigger that rejects duplicate token issuance for the same authorization code, or a custom adapter override that performs an atomic compare-and-delete. Fix: 1. Upgrade to `@better-auth/oauth-provider@1.6.11` or later. If developers use the legacy plugin paths from `better-auth/plugins`, upgrade `better-auth` to `1.6.11` or later. 2. If developers cannot upgrade, see workarounds below. ### Summary The OAuth provider's `POST /oauth2/token` endpoint, on the `authorization_code` grant, redeems a single-use authorization code through a non-atomic find-then-delete sequence. Two concurrent requests with the same `code` value both pass the read step before either delete completes, then both proceed to PKCE verification and `createUserTokens`. Each surviving request mints a fresh access token, refresh token, and id token. RFC 6749 §4.1.2 requires authorization codes to be single-use; this primitive does not enforce that under concurrency. ### Details The same architectural primitive (find a single-use verification row, then delete it, then trust the row to authorize) is used in 20 other call sites across the codebase. The deletion primitive returns `Promise<void>`, discarding the row count surfaced by `adapter.deleteMany`, so no call site can detect "another caller already claimed this row". The fix lands at the primitive layer rather than at any individual call site. The fix introduces a `claimVerificationByIdentifier` primitive at the internal-adapter layer that performs an atomic claim-and-return, replaces the find-then-delete pair at this call site, and migrates the highest-impact variant sites in the same release. ### Patches Fixed in `@better-auth/oauth-provider@1.6.11` and `better-auth@1.6.11` for the legacy `oidc-provider` and `mcp` plugin paths. All three token-exchange call sites now consume the verification row through `internalAdapter.consumeVerificationValue`, an atomic claim primitive that deletes the row and returns its prior value in one operation. The first request to arrive takes the row and mints tokens; concurrent racers observe an empty result and return `invalid_grant`. Error-code consistency is also tightened on the `@better-auth/oauth-provider` token endpoint: the malformed-verification-value branches previously returned a project-specific `invalid_verification` code, which is not part of RFC 6749 §5.2's response error set. Both branches now return `invalid_grant` so spec-compliant clients can branch on the standard code without a special case. ### Workarounds None of these close the bug fully without a code patch. Upgrading is the only good path. - **Network-layer**: deploy an authorization-server-aware reverse proxy (Envoy, NGINX with Lua, custom Cloudflare Worker) that holds an in-flight registry keyed by the `code` parameter and serializes concurrent requests for the same code. Fragile under multi-instance deployments unless the registry is shared (Redis-backed). - **Database-layer**: add a SQL or Mongo uniqueness constraint that prevents two `oauthAccessToken` rows from being created with the same upstream code reference. Adapter-specific and not always feasible since the schema does not currently store the source code. - **Application-layer**: wrap `deleteVerificationByIdentifier` with a custom hook that uses `adapter.deleteMany` and surfaces the count, then injects an `invalid_grant` rejection when the count is zero. Requires forking the internal adapter. ### Impact - **Multiple independent token sets from a single authorization**: forked access tokens, refresh tokens, and id tokens issued from the same code, all valid for the original user's authorization scope. - **Detection bypass**: standard OAuth single-use enforcement does not fire for the second redemption when both requests interleave through the read step. - **Legacy-plugin reach**: `oidc-provider` and `mcp` plugins share the primitive on the same surface, so deployments using them inherit the same impact. ### Credit Reported by @chdanielmueller. ### Resources - [CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization (Race Condition)](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html) - [CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/367.html) - [CWE-294: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/294.html) - [RFC 6749 §4.1.2: Authorization Response](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.2) - [OAuth 2.1 §4.1: Authorization Code Grant](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-1#section-4.1)

06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-07-15modified 2026-07-21
08

references (9)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan