CVE-2026-52870

highpriority · track · 0OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.004 · 33 %ileEUFRUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.39% (33rd) EPSS
CVSS 7.6 · high
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

The MCP Python SDK, called mcp on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). From 1.23.0 until 1.27.2, default handlers installed by server.experimental.enable_tasks() for tasks/list, tasks/get, tasks/result, and tasks/cancel operate only on task identifiers without recording the session that created each task, allowing any connected client to enumerate, read results from, consume messages for, or cancel other clients' tasks. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.2.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.6
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.17.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:Lsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.17.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:Lsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 4.7
v3.17.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v3.17highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (3)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-hvrp-rf83-w775MCP Python SDK: Experimental task handlers allow any client to access and cancel other clients' tasks2026-07-16ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary In affected versions, the default request handlers installed by the experimental tasks feature (`server.experimental.enable_tasks()`) did not check which session created a task before acting on it. On a server with more than one connected client, any client could observe, read results from, and cancel tasks belonging to other clients. ### Am I affected? Only if the developer's application server calls `server.experimental.enable_tasks()`. If `grep -r enable_tasks` over their codebase finds nothing, the application is not affected. ### Details When tasks support is enabled on the low-level server, default handlers are registered for `tasks/list`, `tasks/get`, `tasks/result`, and `tasks/cancel`. These handlers operated on the task identifier alone and kept no record of the session that created each task. Because `tasks/list` returned every task in the store, a connected client did not need to know any identifiers in advance: it could enumerate all tasks, read any task's status and result via `tasks/get` and `tasks/result`, retrieve queued task messages — such as elicitation requests intended for the task's creator, which are removed from the queue on delivery, so the intended recipient never receives them — and cancel any task via `tasks/cancel`. ### Impact Servers that call `server.experimental.enable_tasks()` and serve multiple clients are affected: one client can read other clients' task results and elicitation payloads, consume messages meant for them, and cancel their tasks. The feature is experimental and opt-in, so servers that never enable it are unaffected. Servers that registered their own task handlers instead of the defaults are affected only if those handlers have the same omission. ### Mitigation Upgrade to version 1.27.2 or later, in which task IDs generated by `run_task()` embed an opaque per-session marker and the default handlers restrict each session to its own tasks: requests for another session's task receive "task not found", and `tasks/list` returns only the requesting session's tasks. Tasks created with explicitly chosen IDs or written directly through a `TaskStore` remain reachable by ID but are not listed. Alternatively, leave the experimental tasks feature disabled, or register task handlers that validate session ownership.

  • CERTFR-2026-AVI-1385Multiples vulnérabilités dans les produits VMwareFrançais2026-10-26vendor · certfrFR
  • PYSEC-2026-3481MCP Python SDK: Experimental task handlers allow any client to access and cancel other clients' tasks2026-07-23vendor · osvUS

    ### Summary In affected versions, the default request handlers installed by the experimental tasks feature (`server.experimental.enable_tasks()`) did not check which session created a task before acting on it. On a server with more than one connected client, any client could observe, read results from, and cancel tasks belonging to other clients. ### Am I affected? Only if the developer's application server calls `server.experimental.enable_tasks()`. If `grep -r enable_tasks` over their codebase finds nothing, the application is not affected. ### Details When tasks support is enabled on the low-level server, default handlers are registered for `tasks/list`, `tasks/get`, `tasks/result`, and `tasks/cancel`. These handlers operated on the task identifier alone and kept no record of the session that created each task. Because `tasks/list` returned every task in the store, a connected client did not need to know any identifiers in advance: it could enumerate all tasks, read any task's status and result via `tasks/get` and `tasks/result`, retrieve queued task messages — such as elicitation requests intended for the task's creator, which are removed from the queue on delivery, so the intended recipient never receives them — and cancel any task via `tasks/cancel`. ### Impact Servers that call `server.experimental.enable_tasks()` and serve multiple clients are affected: one client can read other clients' task results and elicitation payloads, consume messages meant for them, and cancel their tasks. The feature is experimental and opt-in, so servers that never enable it are unaffected. Servers that registered their own task handlers instead of the defaults are affected only if those handlers have the same omission. ### Mitigation Upgrade to version 1.27.2 or later, in which task IDs generated by `run_task()` embed an opaque per-session marker and the default handlers restrict each session to its own tasks: requests for another session's task receive "task not found", and `tasks/list` returns only the requesting session's tasks. Tasks created with explicitly chosen IDs or written directly through a `TaskStore` remain reachable by ID but are not listed. Alternatively, leave the experimental tasks feature disabled, or register task handlers that validate session ownership.

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-07-15modified 2026-10-24
08

references (13)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan