CVE-2026-52826
mediumpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.004 · 37 %ileUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-28
Kimai is an open-source time tracking application. Prior to 2.57.0, GET or POST requests to /en/admin/project/{id}/rate/{rate}, /en/admin/customer/{id}/rate/{rate}, and /en/admin/activity/{id}/rate/{rate} independently resolve the authorized parent identifier and the attacker-selected child rate identifier without confirming that the ProjectRate, CustomerRate, or ActivityRate belongs to that parent. An authenticated user who can edit one parent object can pair it with a rate record from an unauthorized project, customer, or activity and persist changes to billing configuration in kimai2_projects_rates, kimai2_customers_rates, or kimai2_activities_rates. This issue is fixed in version 2.57.0.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–medium · 1.3–5.3
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (1)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (1)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-2xgg-2x8h-8xw4Kimai: Improper Authorization in Project, Customer, and Activity Rate Edit Endpoints Allows Cross-Scope Rate Manipulation2026-07-14ghsa · osvUS
### Summary Kimai 2.56.0 contains an authenticated improper authorization vulnerability in the Web rate editing flows for projects, customers, and activities. A user who can edit one authorized parent object can combine that authorized parent ID with the rate ID of a different, unauthorized parent object and thereby modify the unauthorized rate record. This affects `ProjectRate`, `CustomerRate`, and `ActivityRate` editing. The issue is caused by missing parent-child consistency validation and allows cross-project, cross-customer, or cross-activity tampering of billing-related configuration. ### Details The issue affects the following Web routes: - `GET/POST /en/admin/project/{id}/rate/{rate}` - `GET/POST /en/admin/customer/{id}/rate/{rate}` - `GET/POST /en/admin/activity/{id}/rate/{rate}` In both cases, the parent object and the rate object are resolved independently from user-controlled route parameters. The controller only checks whether the current user may edit the parent object referenced by `{id}`, but it does not verify that the child rate object referenced by `{rate}` actually belongs to that same parent. In these controllers, there is no validation such as: - `$rate->getProject() === $project` - `$rate->getCustomer() === $customer` - `$rate->getActivity() === $activity` This missing binding check is especially notable because the API delete endpoints already enforce the expected parent-child relationship. This shows that parent-child consistency is already a recognized invariant in the application design, but the Web edit endpoints fail to enforce it for projects, customers, and activities. *A PoC was provided, but removed for security reasons.* ### Impact This vulnerability allows authenticated users to tamper with billing-related rate configuration outside their authorized project, customer, or activity scope. An attacker can modify rate values belonging to other teams or business domains, which can affect time-based settlement, inherited pricing, cost calculations, budget reporting, revenue reporting, and downstream invoice generation. Because the issue directly persists changes into `kimai2_projects_rates`, `kimai2_customers_rates`, and `kimai2_activities_rates`, it is a real cross-scope integrity vulnerability rather than a UI-only flaw. The attack breaks team-based isolation boundaries for high-value financial configuration. # Solution The rate edit forms for `customers`, `projects` and `activities` now verify that the rate belongs to the parent referenced in the URL and reject the request otherwise. See [https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-2xgg-2x8h-8xw4](https://www.kimai.org/en/security/ghsa-2xgg-2x8h-8xw4) for more information.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (5) nvd
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan