CVE-2026-50020

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Netty ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen.

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM Planning Analytics ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder Daten zu manipulieren.

## Summary Before reading the first request-line, `HttpObjectDecoder` skips every byte for which `Character.isISOControl(b)` is `true` (0x00–0x1F and 0x7F) as well as all whitespace. RFC 9112 §2.2 only asks servers to ignore **empty CRLF lines** preceding the request-line — a carefully scoped robustness allowance intended to handle HTTP/1.0 POST workarounds. Silently absorbing NUL bytes, SOH, STX, and other non-CRLF control characters goes significantly beyond this, and can be exploited for request-boundary confusion in pipelined or multiplexed transports where a front-end component treats those bytes differently. ## Affected Code | File | Lines | Role | |------|-------|------| | `codec-http/src/main/java/io/netty/handler/codec/http/HttpObjectDecoder.java` | 1298–1313 | `ISO_CONTROL_OR_WHITESPACE` static initialiser — marks all ISO control chars | | `codec-http/src/main/java/io/netty/handler/codec/http/HttpObjectDecoder.java` | 1307–1313 | `SKIP_CONTROL_CHARS_BYTES` `ByteProcessor` — skips the entire set | | `codec-http/src/main/java/io/netty/handler/codec/http/HttpObjectDecoder.java` | 1275–1289 | `LineParser.skipControlChars` — advances `readerIndex` past all matching bytes | ## Specification Analysis ### RFC 9112 §2.2 — Message Parsing > In the interest of robustness, a server that is expecting to receive and parse a > request-line **SHOULD ignore at least one empty line (CRLF)** received prior to the > request-line. > An HTTP/1.1 user agent **MUST NOT** preface or follow a request with an extra CRLF. ### Deviation The RFC names a single permitted exception: an **empty line** (bare CRLF, i.e. the two-byte sequence `\r\n`). The `ISO_CONTROL_OR_WHITESPACE` table is initialised as: ```java for (byte b = Byte.MIN_VALUE; b < Byte.MAX_VALUE; b++) { ISO_CONTROL_OR_WHITESPACE[128 + b] = Character.isISOControl(b) || isWhitespace(b); } ``` `Character.isISOControl` returns `true` for `0x00`–`0x1F` and `0x7F`. This includes NUL (`0x00`), SOH (`0x01`), STX (`0x02`), BEL (`0x07`), DEL (`0x7F`), and every other non-CRLF control character. The `SKIP_CONTROL_CHARS` state runs this scan unconditionally before the first `READ_INITIAL`, meaning any sequence of such bytes prepended to a request is silently consumed. A load balancer or TLS terminator that does not perform the same scan sees a different message boundary than Netty does, which is the basis of a request-desync / smuggling attack. ## Suggested Unit Test Add to `HttpRequestDecoderTest.java`. ```java @Test public void testNonCrlfControlBytesPrecedingRequestLineAreRejected() { // RFC 9112 §2.2: servers SHOULD ignore "at least one empty line (CRLF)" before the // request-line. Non-CRLF control bytes are not part of this robustness allowance // and must not be silently swallowed. EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpRequestDecoder()); ByteBuf buf = Unpooled.buffer(); buf.writeByte(0x00); // NUL — not an empty CRLF line buf.writeByte(0x01); // SOH — not an empty CRLF line buf.writeCharSequence( "GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: example.com\r\n\r\n", CharsetUtil.US_ASCII); channel.writeInbound(buf); HttpRequest req = channel.readInbound(); // Current behaviour: NUL and SOH are in ISO_CONTROL_OR_WHITESPACE, so they are // silently skipped; the request decodes successfully and isFailure() == false. // // RFC-correct behaviour: only empty CRLF lines should be ignored; NUL/SOH must // cause a parse error — isFailure() == true. assertTrue( req.decoderResult().isFailure(), "Non-CRLF control bytes before the request-line must not be silently skipped " + "(RFC 9112 §2.2 allows only empty CRLF lines)"); assertFalse(channel.finish()); } ``` **Current behaviour (unfixed):** `skipControlChars` advances past `0x00` and `0x01` because both are in `ISO_CONTROL_OR_WHITESPACE`; the request parses normally, `isFailure()` is `false` → test **fails**. **Expected behaviour after fix:** only CRLF empty lines are tolerated; non-CRLF control bytes produce an error, `isFailure()` is `true` → test **passes**.