CVE-2026-49284

highpriority · track · 0OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.002 · 13 %ileDEEUNLUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.22% (13th) EPSS
CVSS 7.1 · high
Is it mine?
21 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
6 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · cert_bund · ncsc_nl

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

SimpleSAMLphp versions before 1.18.6 contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Prior to 2.4.7 and 2.5.2, SimpleSAMLphp's SAML SP ACS path does not enforce the IdP selected for an SP-initiated login when unsigned Response/InResponseTo is combined with a signed assertion lacking SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo, allowing a response issued by one trusted IdP to be bound to SP state created for another IdP and bypass flows that route users to a specific IdP, including deployments that set enable_unsolicited to false. This issue is fixed in versions 2.4.7 and 2.5.2.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.1
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 6.5–7.1

v3.17.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.17.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 4.2
v3.17.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
v3.17.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:Nsecondary · NCSC-NL NL
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (21)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

showing 20 of 21
05

advisories (3)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • NCSC-2026-0375Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Oracle CommunicationsNL2026-09-16csaf · ncsc_nlNL

    Oracle heeft 31 kwetsbaarheden verholpen in diverse Oracle Communications-producten, waaronder Oracle Communications Unified Assurance, Oracle Communications Cloud Native Core Security Edge Protection Proxy, Oracle Communications MetaSolv Solution Module - ASR, Oracle Communications Service Catalog and Design en Oracle Communications Operations Monitor.

  • WID-SEC-W-2026-3403Oracle Communications: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-09-15csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein entfernter, anonymer oder authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Oracle Communications ausnutzen, um die Vertraulichkeit, Integrität und Verfügbarkeit zu gefährden.

  • GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrmSimpleSAMLphp SP accepts a response from an unexpected IdP when unsigned `Response/InResponseTo` is combined with a signed assertion lacking `SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo`2026-07-02ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary SimpleSAMLphp's SAML SP ACS path does not enforce the IdP selected for an SP-initiated login. If a saved SP state contains `ExpectedIssuer = IdP A`, but the ACS receives a valid response from `IdP B`, the code logs a warning and continues processing instead of rejecting the response. That behavior becomes security-relevant when combined with the response-processing rule that accepts an unsigned `samlp:Response/@InResponseTo` outside the signed assertion whenever the signed assertion's `SubjectConfirmationData` does not carry its own `InResponseTo`. A response issued by one trusted IdP can therefore be bound to SP state created for another IdP. ## Impact In a multi-IdP deployment, a lower-trust IdP can satisfy SP state created for a different expected IdP. This can bypass an SP flow that intentionally routes the user to a specific IdP, including deployments that set `enable_unsolicited` to `false` to prevent IdP-initiated logins. The impact is highest when the SP trusts multiple IdPs with different assurance levels, tenant boundaries, or attribute namespaces, and application authorization depends on the selected/expected IdP. In those deployments this is an authentication/authorization bypass candidate. Impact strongly depends on whether an attacker can obtain a signed IdP-initiated assertion from a lower-trust trusted IdP and whether the downstream application maps identifiers globally.

06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

08

references (9)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan