CVE-2026-47069

mediumpriority · track · 21EPSS 0.004 · 37 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.43% (37th) EPSS
CVSS 5.3 · medium
Is it mine?
4 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') vulnerability in benoitc hackney allows HTTP Response Splitting. The hackney_cookie:setcookie/3 function in src/hackney_cookie.erl validates the Name and Value arguments against CRLF and control characters, but concatenates the domain and path options verbatim into the output iolist with no equivalent check. An attacker who controls either option — for example by supplying a Host header value forwarded as the cookie domain, or a request path forwarded as the cookie path — can inject a literal CRLF sequence and arbitrary additional Set-Cookie headers into the HTTP response. This issue affects hackney: from 0.9.0 before 4.0.1.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

5.3
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–medium · 0.5–5.3

v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.9 · impact 1.4
v4.02.1lowCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v4.02.1lowCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary
v4.00.5lowCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (4)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-mp55-p8c9-rfw2Hackney has CRLF / header injection via unvalidated `domain` and `path` options2026-06-26ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary CRLF injection in `hackney_cookie:setcookie/3` (`src/hackney_cookie.erl`). The function validates `Name` and `Value` against CR/LF and control characters but concatenates the `domain` and `path` options verbatim into the output binary. If either option carries attacker-controlled data, a `Host` header forwarded as the cookie domain, a request URI forwarded as the cookie path, a `\r\n` in the value splits the `Set-Cookie` header and lets the attacker inject additional headers into the HTTP response. ### Details **1. Asymmetric validation** Lines 27–34 of `hackney_cookie.erl` run `binary:match` on `Name` and `Value`, rejecting `=`, `,`, `;`, whitespace, `\r`, `\n`, `\013`, and `\014`. The `Domain` and `Path` options (lines 47 and 51) skip this check entirely and land straight in the result iolist: ```erlang [<<"; Domain=">>, Domain] [<<"; Path=">>, Path] ``` `iolist_to_binary(...)` on line 63 flattens everything and returns it to the caller. **2. Injection** A `Path` of `<<"/x\r\nSet-Cookie: admin=1; Path=/">>` produces a binary with a literal `\r\n`. Written into a `Set-Cookie` response header, the receiving HTTP parser splits it into two headers — one legitimate, one attacker-controlled. **3. Realistic trigger** Common patterns: keying the cookie domain off `Host`, deriving the path from the request URI, or copying a `Location` path into a cookie. Any of these lets a remote attacker control the injected content. ### PoC 1. Call `hackney_cookie:setcookie(<<"sid">>, <<"abc">>, [{path, <<"/x\r\nSet-Cookie: admin=1; Path=/">>}])`. 2. The returned binary contains a literal `\r\n` followed by a second `Set-Cookie:` line. 3. Write the result into a `Set-Cookie` response header — the client parses two headers, including `admin=1`. ### Impact Cookie injection / HTTP response splitting at the `hackney_cookie` API boundary. Affects hackney 0.9.0 through 4.0.0 wherever `domain` or `path` options are populated from request data. Exploitation can overwrite session/auth cookies, fix cookies, or strip `Secure`/`HttpOnly` flags. CVSS v4.0: **2.1 (LOW)** — requires attacker-controlled input to reach the `domain` or `path` option. ## Resources * Introduction commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/602d5c7f2ea4acbc83ed75230655d935a0750ebc * Patch commit: https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/8e02b99c28aea1b3fa2ddc0e66f51fe5bb0ac540

  • EEF-CVE-2026-47069CRLF injection in cookie domain/path options in hackney2026-05-25vendor · osvUS

    ## Summary Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') vulnerability in benoitc hackney allows HTTP Response Splitting. The hackney\_cookie:setcookie/3 function in src/hackney\_cookie.erl validates the Name and Value arguments against CRLF and control characters, but concatenates the domain and path options verbatim into the output iolist with no equivalent check. An attacker who controls either option — for example by supplying a Host header value forwarded as the cookie domain, or a request path forwarded as the cookie path — can inject a literal CRLF sequence and arbitrary additional Set-Cookie headers into the HTTP response. This issue affects hackney: from 0.9.0 before 4.0.1.

06

also known as (5)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-05-25modified 2026-07-24
08

references (14)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan