CVE-2026-4277
criticalpriority · track · 0OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.005 · 40 %ileDEEURUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of forged `POST` data in `GenericInlineModelAdmin`. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (40)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (4)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- WID-SEC-W-2026-1002Django: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-04-07csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Django ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen, Daten zu manipulieren oder Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen.
- GHSA-pwjp-ccjc-ghwgDjango vulnerable to privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin2026-04-07ghsa · osvUS
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of forged `POST` data in `GenericInlineModelAdmin`. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue.
- BIT-django-2026-4277Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin2026-04-16vendor · osvUS
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of forged `POST` data in `GenericInlineModelAdmin`. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue.
- PYSEC-2026-522026-04-07vendor · osvUS
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of forged `POST` data in `GenericInlineModelAdmin`. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue.
also known as (8)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (10)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/cnnvd
- https://groups.google.com/g/django-announcecnnvd
- https://vigilance.fr/vulnerability/Django-multiple-vulnerabilities-dated-08-04-2026-50383cnnvd
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/apr/07/security-releases/cnnvd
- https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/enisa_euvd
- https://groups.google.com/g/django-announceenisa_euvd
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2026/apr/07/security-releases/enisa_euvd
- https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/security/PatchVendor Advisorynvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan