CVE-2026-41663

lowpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.001 · 2 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.12% (2nd) EPSS
CVSS 3.5 · low
Is it mine?
2 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
3 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.9, several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because SameSite=Lax cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page. This issue has been patched in version 5.0.9.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

3.5
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.13.5lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.13.5lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 0.9 · impact 2.5
v3.13.5lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v3.13.2lowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (2)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-rw74-vc9h-534jAdmidio has CSRF on Admin Preferences that Triggers Unauthorized Backup, .htaccess Write, and Email Send2026-04-29ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary Several administrative operations in Admidio's preferences module (database backup, test email, htaccess generation) fire via GET requests with no CSRF token validation. Because `SameSite=Lax` cookies travel with top-level GET navigations, an attacker forces an authenticated admin to trigger these actions from a malicious page. ## Details In `modules/preferences.php`, the `backup`, `test_email`, and `htaccess` modes accept GET parameters with no CSRF token check: ```php // modules/preferences.php - backup mode case 'backup': // Creates full database dump and serves as download // No CSRF token validation $backupFile = $gDb->backup(); // ... sends file to client break; case 'test_email': // Sends test email from the server // No CSRF token validation break; case 'htaccess': // Writes .htaccess file to disk // No CSRF token validation break; ``` The `save` mode in the same file validates CSRF via `getFormObject()`, confirming the developers intended CSRF protection but did not apply it to these other modes. Because these are GET requests, `SameSite=Lax` browsers include session cookies on top-level cross-origin navigations, making CSRF exploitation trivial. ## Proof of Concept Simplified attacker page (`csrf.html` hosted on attacker origin): ```html <html> <body> <h1>Loading...</h1> <!-- Trigger backup creation on victim's browser --> <script>window.location = 'https://target-admidio.example.com/adm_program/modules/preferences.php?mode=backup';</script> </body> </html> ``` When an administrator visits this page, the browser navigates to the Admidio backup URL with full session cookies. The server generates a database dump and serves it as a download to the victim's browser. Note: the backup downloads to the victim's machine, not to the attacker. The attacker cannot read the response cross-origin. For `htaccess` mode, the CSRF overwrites the `.htaccess` file on the server, disrupting the application. For `test_email` mode, it triggers email sends from the server, which an attacker can abuse for spam or to probe internal email infrastructure. ## Impact An attacker tricks an Admidio administrator into visiting a malicious page that triggers state-changing operations on the server: - **Backup creation**: forces the server to generate a full database dump. The backup downloads to the victim's browser, not to the attacker. However, repeated backup triggers can cause disk I/O and storage pressure on the server. - **htaccess modification**: overwrites the server's `.htaccess` file, breaking URL routing or disabling security headers. - **Test email**: fires email sends from the server, usable as a spam relay or to probe internal mail configuration. The core issue is that state-changing operations run via unprotected GET requests. The victim only needs to visit a single attacker-controlled page while logged in. ## Recommended Fix 1. Change `backup`, `test_email`, and `htaccess` operations to require POST requests. 2. Add CSRF token validation using the existing `getFormObject()` mechanism. 3. As defense in depth, set `SameSite=Strict` on session cookies or add a confirmation step for destructive operations like database backup. --- *Found by [aisafe.io](https://aisafe.io)*

06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-05-07modified 2026-06-17
08

references (6)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan