CVE-2026-39891

highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.006 · 46 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.56% (46th) EPSS
CVSS 8.8 · high
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.115, the create_agent_centric_tools() function returns tools (like acp_create_file) that process file content using template rendering. When user input from agent.start() is passed directly into these tools without escaping, template expressions in the input are executed rather than treated as literal text. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.115.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.8
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 5.9
v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-hwg5-x759-7wjgPraisonAI has Template Injection in Agent Tool Definitions2026-04-08ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary Direct insertion of unescaped user input into template-rendering tools allows arbitrary code execution via specially crafted agent instructions. ## Details The `create_agent_centric_tools()` function returns tools (like `acp_create_file`) that process file content using template rendering. When user input from `agent.start()` is passed directly into these tools without escaping (as shown in `agent_centric_example.py:85-86`), template expressions in the input are executed rather than treated as literal text. This occurs because: 1. No input sanitization or escaping is applied to user-controlled content 2. The ACP-enabled runtime auto-approves operations (`approval_mode="auto"`) 3. Tools lack context-aware escaping for template syntax ## PoC ```python # Replace the agent.start() call at line 85 with: result = agent.start('Create file with content: {{ self.__init__.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__("os").system("touch /tmp/pwned") }}') ``` Successful exploitation creates `/tmp/pwned` confirming arbitrary command execution. The expression `{{7*7}}` renders as `49` instead of literal text. ## Impact Attackers can execute arbitrary system commands with the privileges of the running process by injecting malicious template expressions through agent instructions. This compromises the host system, enabling data theft, ransomware deployment, or lateral movement. ## Recommended Fix 1. **Input Sanitization**: Implement strict whitelist validation for file content 2. **Contextual Escaping**: Auto-escape template syntax characters (e.g., `{{ }}`) in user input using Jinja2 `autoescape=True` 3. **Sandboxing**: Restrict template execution environments using secure eval modes 4. **Approval Hardening**: Require manual approval for file creation operations in production

  • PYSEC-2026-2917PraisonAI has Template Injection in Agent Tool Definitions2026-07-13vendor · osvUS

    ## Summary Direct insertion of unescaped user input into template-rendering tools allows arbitrary code execution via specially crafted agent instructions. ## Details The `create_agent_centric_tools()` function returns tools (like `acp_create_file`) that process file content using template rendering. When user input from `agent.start()` is passed directly into these tools without escaping (as shown in `agent_centric_example.py:85-86`), template expressions in the input are executed rather than treated as literal text. This occurs because: 1. No input sanitization or escaping is applied to user-controlled content 2. The ACP-enabled runtime auto-approves operations (`approval_mode="auto"`) 3. Tools lack context-aware escaping for template syntax ## PoC ```python # Replace the agent.start() call at line 85 with: result = agent.start('Create file with content: {{ self.__init__.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__("os").system("touch /tmp/pwned") }}') ``` Successful exploitation creates `/tmp/pwned` confirming arbitrary command execution. The expression `{{7*7}}` renders as `49` instead of literal text. ## Impact Attackers can execute arbitrary system commands with the privileges of the running process by injecting malicious template expressions through agent instructions. This compromises the host system, enabling data theft, ransomware deployment, or lateral movement. ## Recommended Fix 1. **Input Sanitization**: Implement strict whitelist validation for file content 2. **Contextual Escaping**: Auto-escape template syntax characters (e.g., `{{ }}`) in user input using Jinja2 `autoescape=True` 3. **Sandboxing**: Restrict template execution environments using secure eval modes 4. **Approval Hardening**: Require manual approval for file creation operations in production

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-04-08modified 2026-07-24
08

references (4)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan