CVE-2026-34826

Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in IBM License Metric Tool ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.

ruby4.0-rubygem-rack-2.2-2.2.23-1.1 on GA media

## Summary `Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges` parses the HTTP `Range` header without limiting the number of individual byte ranges. Although the existing fix for CVE-2024-26141 rejects ranges whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, it does not restrict the count of ranges. An attacker can supply many small overlapping ranges such as `0-0,0-0,0-0,...` to trigger disproportionate CPU, memory, I/O, and bandwidth consumption per request. This results in a denial of service condition in Rack file-serving paths that process multipart byte range responses. ## Details `Rack::Utils.get_byte_ranges` accepts a comma-separated list of byte ranges and validates them based on their aggregate size, but does not impose a limit on how many individual ranges may be supplied. As a result, a request such as: ```http Range: bytes=0-0,0-0,0-0,0-0,... ``` can contain thousands of overlapping one-byte ranges while still satisfying the total-size check added for CVE-2024-26141. When such a header is processed by Rack’s file-serving code, each range causes additional work, including multipart response generation, per-range iteration, file seek and read operations, and temporary string allocation for response size calculation and output. This allows a relatively small request header to trigger disproportionately expensive processing and a much larger multipart response. The issue is distinct from CVE-2024-26141. That fix prevents range sets whose total byte coverage exceeds the file size, but does not prevent a large number of overlapping ranges whose summed size remains within that limit. ## Impact Applications that expose file-serving paths with byte range support may be vulnerable to denial of service. An unauthenticated attacker can send crafted `Range` headers containing many small overlapping ranges to consume excessive CPU time, memory, file I/O, and bandwidth. Repeated requests may reduce application availability and increase pressure on workers and garbage collection. ## Mitigation * Update to a patched version of Rack that limits the number of accepted byte ranges. * Reject or normalize multipart byte range requests containing excessive range counts. * Consider disabling multipart range support where it is not required. * Apply request filtering or header restrictions at the reverse proxy or application boundary to limit abusive `Range` headers.