CVE-2026-34568

criticalpriority · track · 36EPSS 0.003 · 25 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.32% (25th) EPSS
CVSS 9 · critical
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when creating or editing blog posts. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into blog post content, which is then stored server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely in multiple application views without proper output encoding, leading to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

9.1
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · high–critical · 8.2–9.1

v3.19criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Hprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.3 · impact 6
v3.19.1criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:Lsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.19.1criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:Lsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 3.1 · impact 5.3
v3.19.1criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v3.18.2highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-x7wh-g25g-53vgCI4MS: Blogs Posts Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS2026-04-01ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary ### **Vulnerability: Stored DOM XSS via Blog Post Content (Persistent Payload Injection)** - Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Unsanitized Blog Post Content in Blog Management ### Description The application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when creating or editing blog posts. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into blog post content, which is then stored server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely in multiple application views without proper output encoding, leading to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). ### Affected Functionality - Blog post creation functionality - Blog post editing functionality - Blog post storage and retrieval logic ### Attack Scenario - An attacker creates or edits a blog post to include a malicious XSS payload. - The application stores this content without sanitization or encoding. - The payload persists and executes whenever the blog post is rendered in affected views. ### Impact - Persistent Stored XSS - Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in victims’ browsers - Privilege escalation when viewed by administrators or privileged users - Full administrator account takeover - Full account takeover across all roles - Full compromise of the entire application Endpoints: - `/backend/blogs/create` - `/backend/blogs/` - `/blog/{id}` ## Steps To Reproduce (POC) 1. Go to the Blog Post Create or Edit page 2. Insert an XSS payload into the blog post content such as: `<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>` 3. Save or publish the blog post 4. View the post via the administrative panel or public blog page 5. Notice the XSS payload executing automatically ## Remediation - **Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation methods:** Do not use `.html()`, `innerHTML`, or similar sink functions in client-side JavaScript or server-side templating (e.g., PHP). Even when user input flowing into these sinks is not immediately apparent, they can introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that an attacker may exploit. - **Apply output encoding:** Implement HTML entity encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering it in the browser. This helps neutralize potentially malicious input. - **Implement input sanitization:** Ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing or output. Currently, no sanitization mechanisms are in place, which should be addressed as a priority. - **Enforce security headers and cookie attributes:** - **Content Security Policy (CSP):** Define and enforce a strict CSP to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts. - **HttpOnly flag:** Set the `HttpOnly` attribute on session cookies to prevent client-side script access. - **SameSite attribute:** Configure the `SameSite` cookie attribute to mitigate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) risks. - **Secure flag:** Ensure all cookies are transmitted only over HTTPS by enabling the `Secure` attribute. These measures collectively reduce the impact of XSS and help prevent escalation paths such as CSRF via XSS. # Ready Video POC: https://mega.nz/file/bYtCQRqT#ph1S_01XaYXiNTzanP3AVL6aQMe0YC5Py7Gko1FoT4A

06

also known as (2)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-04-01modified 2026-10-26
08

references (7)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan