CVE-2026-33326
mediumpriority · track · 17OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.003 · 19 %ileEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
Keystone is a content management system for Node.js. Prior to version 6.5.2, {field}.isFilterable access control can be bypassed in findMany queries by passing a cursor. This can be used to confirm the existence of records by protected field values. The fix for CVE-2025-46720 (field-level isFilterable bypass for update and delete mutations) added checks to the where parameter in update and delete mutations however the cursor parameter in findMany was not patched and accepts the same UniqueWhere input type. This issue has been patched in version 6.5.2.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (3)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (1)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-cgcg-q9jh-5pr2@keystone-6/core: `isFilterable` bypass via `cursor` parameter in findMany (CVE-2025-46720 incomplete fix)2026-03-19ghsa · osvUS
# Summary `{field}.isFilterable` access control can be bypassed in `findMany` queries by passing a `cursor`. This can be used to confirm the existence of records by protected field values. The fix for [CVE-2025-46720](https://github.com/keystonejs/keystone/security/advisories/GHSA-hg9m-67mm-7pg3) (field-level `isFilterable` bypass for update and delete mutations) added checks to the `where` parameter in `update` and `delete` mutations however the `cursor` parameter in `findMany` was not patched and accepts the same `UniqueWhere` input type. # Impact This affects any project relying on `isFilterable` behaviour (at the list or field level) to prevent external users from using the filtering of fields as a discovery mechanism. `isFilterable` access control using a function can be bypassed by using the `cursor` input. This has no impact on projects using `isFilterable: false` or `defaultIsFilterable: false` for sensitive fields, or if you have otherwise omitted filtering by these fields from your GraphQL schema. (See workarounds) # Patches This issue has been patched in `@keystone-6/core` version 6.5.2. # Workarounds To mitigate this issue in older versions where patching is not a viable pathway. - Set `{field}.isFilterable: false` statically for relevant fields to prevent filtering by them earlier in the access control pipeline (that is, don't use functions) - Set `{field}.graphql.omit.read: true` for relevant fields, which implicitly removes filtering by these fields your GraphQL schema
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (4)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/keystonejs/keystone/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/keystonejs/keystone/security/advisories/GHSA-cgcg-q9jh-5pr2cnnvd
- https://github.com/keystonejs/keystone/security/advisories/GHSA-cgcg-q9jh-5pr2enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/keystonejs/keystone/security/advisories/GHSA-cgcg-q9jh-5pr2Vendor Advisorynvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan