CVE-2026-32762

mediumpriority · track · 26EPSS 0.002 · 7 %ileEUFRUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.18% (7th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
6 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. From versions 3.0.0.beta1 to before 3.1.21 and 3.2.0 to before 3.2.6, Rack::Utils.forwarded_values parses the RFC 7239 Forwarded header by splitting on semicolons before handling quoted-string values. Because quoted values may legally contain semicolons, a header can be interpreted by Rack as multiple Forwarded directives rather than as a single quoted for value. In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary validates or preserves quoted Forwarded values differently, this discrepancy can allow an attacker to smuggle host, proto, for, or by parameters through a single header value. This issue has been patched in versions 3.1.21 and 3.2.6.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

6.5
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.9 · impact 2.5
v3.14.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.14.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.2 · impact 2.5
v3.14.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Trackcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (6)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-qfgr-crr9-7r49Rack: Forwarded Header semicolon injection enables Host and Scheme spoofing2026-04-02ghsa · osvUS

    ## Summary `Rack::Utils.forwarded_values` parses the RFC 7239 `Forwarded` header by splitting on semicolons before handling quoted-string values. Because quoted values may legally contain semicolons, a header such as: ```http Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https" ``` can be interpreted by Rack as multiple `Forwarded` directives rather than as a single quoted `for` value. In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary validates or preserves quoted `Forwarded` values differently, this discrepancy can allow an attacker to smuggle `host`, `proto`, `for`, or `by` parameters through a single header value. ## Details `Rack::Utils.forwarded_values` processes the header using logic equivalent to: ```ruby forwarded_header.split(';').each_with_object({}) do |field, values| field.split(',').each do |pair| pair = pair.split('=').map(&:strip).join('=') return nil unless pair =~ /\A(by|for|host|proto)="?([^"]+)"?\Z/i (values[$1.downcase.to_sym] ||= []) << $2 end end ``` The method splits on `;` before it parses individual `name=value` pairs. This is inconsistent with RFC 7239, which permits quoted-string values, and quoted strings may contain semicolons as literal content. As a result, a header value such as: ```http Forwarded: for="127.0.0.1;host=evil.com;proto=https" ``` is not treated as a single `for` value. Instead, Rack may interpret it as if the client had supplied separate `for`, `host`, and `proto` directives. This creates an interpretation conflict when another component in front of Rack treats the quoted value as valid literal content, while Rack reparses it as multiple forwarding parameters. ## Impact Applications that rely on `Forwarded` to derive request metadata may observe attacker-controlled values for `host`, `proto`, `for`, or related URL components. In affected deployments, this can lead to host or scheme spoofing in derived values such as `req.host`, `req.scheme`, `req.base_url`, or `req.url`. Applications that use those values for password reset links, redirects, absolute URL generation, logging, IP-based decisions, or backend requests may be vulnerable to downstream security impact. The practical security impact depends on deployment architecture. If clients can already supply arbitrary trusted `Forwarded` parameters directly, this bug may not add meaningful attacker capability. The issue is most relevant where an upstream component and Rack interpret the same `Forwarded` header differently. ## Mitigation * Update to a patched version of Rack that parses `Forwarded` quoted-string values before splitting on parameter delimiters. * Avoid trusting client-supplied `Forwarded` headers unless they are normalized or regenerated by a trusted reverse proxy. * Prefer stripping inbound `Forwarded` headers at the edge and reconstructing them from trusted proxy metadata. * Avoid using `req.host`, `req.scheme`, `req.base_url`, or `req.url` for security-sensitive operations unless the forwarding chain is explicitly trusted and validated.

  • CERTFR-2026-AVI-1352Multiples vulnérabilités dans Oracle PeopleSoftFrançais2026-10-21vendor · certfrFR
06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-04-02modified 2026-07-24
08

references (4)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan