CVE-2026-32108
mediumpriority · track · 26OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.003 · 21 %ileEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.12, there was a missing permission-check in the shares feature (the shr global-option). This vulnerability only applies when the shares feature is used for the specific purpose of creating a share of just a single file inside a folder or either the FTP or SFTP server is enabled, and also made publicly accessible. Given these conditions, when a user is browsing a share through either FTP or SFTP (not http or https), they can gain read-access to the remaining files inside the shared folder by guessing/bruteforcing the filenames. It was not possible to descend into subdirectories in this manner; only the sibling files were accessible. This vulnerability is similar to CVE-2025-58753 which was previously fixed for HTTP and HTTPS, but not for FTP. The FTPS server did not yet exist at that time. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.20.12.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–medium · 0.6–6.5
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (3)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (2)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-67rw-2x62-mqqmCopyparty ftp/sftp: Sharing a single file did not fully restrict source-folder access2026-03-12ghsa · osvUS
There was a missing permission-check in the shares feature (the `shr` global-option). This vulnerability only applies in the following scenario: * The [shares](https://github.com/9001/copyparty/#shares) feature is used for the specific purpose of creating a share of just a single file inside a folder * Either the FTP or SFTP server is enabled, and also made publically accessible * If a share is password-protected, then SFTP was not vulnerable unless the `sftp-pw` global-option was also enabled Given these conditions, when a user is browsing a share through either FTP or SFTP (not http or https), they can gain read-access to the remaining files inside the shared folder by guessing/bruteforcing the filenames. It was not possible to descend into subdirectories in this manner; only the sibling files were accessible. This issue did not affect filekeys or dirkeys. This vulnerability is [CVE-2025-58753](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58753) which was previously fixed for HTTP and HTTPS, but not for FTP. The FTPS server did not yet exist at that time.
- PYSEC-2026-312026-03-11vendor · osvUS
Copyparty is a portable file server. Prior to 1.20.12, there was a missing permission-check in the shares feature (the shr global-option). This vulnerability only applies when the shares feature is used for the specific purpose of creating a share of just a single file inside a folder or either the FTP or SFTP server is enabled, and also made publicly accessible. Given these conditions, when a user is browsing a share through either FTP or SFTP (not http or https), they can gain read-access to the remaining files inside the shared folder by guessing/bruteforcing the filenames. It was not possible to descend into subdirectories in this manner; only the sibling files were accessible. This vulnerability is similar to CVE-2025-58753 which was previously fixed for HTTP and HTTPS, but not for FTP. The FTPS server did not yet exist at that time. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.20.12.
also known as (6)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (4)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/9001/copyparty/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/9001/copyparty/security/advisories/GHSA-67rw-2x62-mqqmcnnvd
- https://github.com/9001/copyparty/security/advisories/GHSA-67rw-2x62-mqqmenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/9001/copyparty/security/advisories/GHSA-67rw-2x62-mqqmVendor Advisorynvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan