CVE-2026-32005
highpriority · track · 32OT risk · elevatedEPSS 0.003 · 22 %ileDEEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.25 fail to enforce sender authorization checks for interactive callbacks including block_action, view_submission, and view_closed in shared workspace deployments. Unauthorized workspace members can bypass allowFrom restrictions and channel user allowlists to enqueue system-event text into active sessions.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 4.9–8.1
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (4)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (2)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- WID-SEC-W-2026-0542OpenClaw: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-02-25csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenClaw ausnutzen, um Dateien zu manipulieren, um Informationen offenzulegen, und um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen.
- GHSA-x2ff-j5c2-ggprOpenClaw: Slack interactive callbacks could skip configured sender checks in some shared-workspace flows2026-03-04ghsa · osvUS
## Impact In shared Slack workspace deployments that rely on sender restrictions (`allowFrom`, DM policy, or channel user allowlists), some interactive callbacks (`block_action`, `view_submission`, `view_closed`) could be accepted before full sender authorization checks. In that scenario, an unauthorized workspace member could enqueue system-event text into an active session. This issue did not provide unauthenticated access, cross-gateway isolation bypass, or host-level privilege escalation by itself. ## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: `openclaw` (npm) - Vulnerable versions: `<= 2026.2.24` - Patched version: `2026.2.25` (planned next npm release) ## Fix Commit(s) - `ce8c67c314b93f570f53c2a9abc124e1e3a54715` ## Release Process Note `patched_versions` is pre-set to the release (`2026.2.25`). Advisory published with npm release `2026.2.25`. ## Trust Model Scope Note OpenClaw does not support adversarial multi-user isolation on a single shared gateway instance. The supported model is one trust boundary per gateway (separate gateways/hosts for mutually untrusted users). See: https://docs.openclaw.ai/gateway/security OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
also known as (2)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (10)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/ce8c67c314b93f570f53c2a9abc124e1e3a54715cnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-x2ff-j5c2-ggprcnnvd
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-authorization-bypass-in-interactive-callbacks-via-sender-check-skipcnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/ce8c67c314b93f570f53c2a9abc124e1e3a54715enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-x2ff-j5c2-ggprenisa_euvd
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-authorization-bypass-in-interactive-callbacks-via-sender-check-skipenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/ce8c67c314b93f570f53c2a9abc124e1e3a54715Patchnvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan