CVE-2026-27898
mediumpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.002 · 7 %ileDEEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
Vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Prior to version 1.35.4, an authenticated regular user can specify another user’s cipher_id and call "PUT /api/ciphers/{id}/partial" Even though the standard retrieval API correctly denies access to that cipher, the partial update endpoint returns 200 OK and exposes cipherDetails (including name, notes, data, secureNote, etc.). This issue has been patched in version 1.35.4.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (7)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (2)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- WID-SEC-W-2026-0594Vaultwarden: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-03-04csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein entfernter, authentisierter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Vaultwarden ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, erweiterte Privilegien zu erlangen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen und Daten zu manipulieren.
- GHSA-w9f8-m526-h7fhVaultwarden has Unauthorized Access via Partial Update API on Another User’s Cipher2026-03-04ghsa · osvUS
## Summary In the test environment, it was confirmed that an authenticated regular user can specify another user’s `cipher_id` and call: ``` PUT /api/ciphers/{id}/partial ``` Even though the standard retrieval API correctly denies access to that cipher, the partial update endpoint returns **200 OK** and exposes `cipherDetails` (including `name`, `notes`, `data`, `secureNote`, etc.). ## Description `put_cipher_partial` retrieves the target Cipher but does **not perform ownership or access control checks** before returning `to_json`. Authorization checks present in the normal update API are missing here. src/api/core/ciphers.rs:717 ```rust let Some(cipher) = Cipher::find_by_uuid(&cipher_id, &conn).await else { err!("Cipher doesn't exist") }; if let Some(ref folder_id) = data.folder_id { if Folder::find_by_uuid_and_user(folder_id, &headers.user.uuid, &conn).await.is_none() { err!("Invalid folder", "Folder does not exist or belongs to another user"); } } // Move cipher cipher.move_to_folder(data.folder_id.clone(), &headers.user.uuid, &conn).await?; // Update favorite cipher.set_favorite(Some(data.favorite), &headers.user.uuid, &conn).await?; Ok(Json(cipher.to_json(&headers.host, &headers.user.uuid, None, CipherSyncType::User, &conn).await?)) ``` By comparison, the standard update API includes an explicit authorization check: src/api/core/ciphers.rs:688 ```rust if !cipher.is_write_accessible_to_user(&headers.user.uuid, &conn).await { err!("Cipher is not write accessible") } ``` The `to_json` method does not abort processing when access restrictions are not met; instead, it proceeds to construct and return a detailed response. src/db/models/cipher.rs:175 ```rust let (read_only, hide_passwords, _) = if sync_type == CipherSyncType::User { match self.get_access_restrictions(user_uuid, cipher_sync_data, conn).await { Some((ro, hp, mn)) => (ro, hp, mn), None => { error!("Cipher ownership assertion failure"); (true, true, false) } } } else { (false, false, false) }; ``` src/db/models/cipher.rs:335 ```rust let mut json_object = json!({ "object": "cipherDetails", "id": self.uuid, "type": self.atype, ... "name": self.name, "notes": self.notes, "fields": fields_json, "data": data_json, ... }); ``` ## Preconditions * The attacker possesses a valid regular-user JWT (Bearer token). * The attacker knows the target (victim) `cipher_id`. ## Steps to Reproduce 1. Prepare the attacker JWT and victim `cipher_id` (preconditions). 2. Baseline check: confirm that standard retrieval is denied. <img width="2014" height="855" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/32b12cc9-3672-4a88-afd0-ef7715474662" /> 3. Execute the vulnerable API. Confirm that **200 OK** is returned and that `cipherDetails` includes fields such as `id`, `name`, `notes`, `secureNote`, etc. <img width="2018" height="1113" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/341b330c-8d55-4f06-a622-0d7da28f62fd" /> ## Potential Impact * Unauthorized disclosure of other users’ cipher information (confidentiality breach). * Creation of unauthorized associations within the attacker’s user context (e.g., `favorite` or folder operations). * The response from `/api/ciphers/<cipher_id>/partial` includes `attachments[].url`. In filesystem (FS) deployments, this returns a tokenized endpoint such as: ``` /attachments/<cipher>/<file>?token=... ``` In object storage deployments, it returns a short-lived pre-signed URL. As a result, an attacker can use these URLs to directly download attachment data that they are not authorized to access. This can lead to disclosure of sensitive information stored in the Vault, including personal data and authentication credentials. Such exposure may further result in account compromise, lateral movement, and other secondary impacts.
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (5)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2026-27898cnnvd
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/security/advisories/GHSA-w9f8-m526-h7fhcnnvd
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/security/advisories/GHSA-w9f8-m526-h7fhenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/security/advisories/GHSA-w9f8-m526-h7fhVendor Advisorynvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan