CVE-2026-27586

criticalpriority · track · 36EPSS 0.003 · 22 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.29% (22nd) EPSS
CVSS 9.1 · critical
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Prior to version 2.11.1, two swallowed errors in `ClientAuthentication.provision()` cause mTLS client certificate authentication to silently fail open when a CA certificate file is missing, unreadable, or malformed. The server starts without error but accepts any client certificate signed by any system-trusted CA, completely bypassing the intended private CA trust boundary. Any deployment using `trusted_ca_cert_file` or `trusted_ca_certs_pem_files` for mTLS will silently degrade to accepting any system-trusted client certificate if the CA file becomes unavailable. This can happen due to a typo in the path, file rotation, corruption, or permission changes. The server gives no indication that mTLS is misconfigured. Version 2.11.1 fixes the vulnerability.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

9.1
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · high–critical · 8–9.1

v3.19.1criticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.9 · impact 5.2
v4.08.8highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:Psecondary · ENISA EU
v4.08.8highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · security-advisories@github.com
v4.08highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-hffm-g8v7-wrv7Caddy: mTLS client authentication silently fails open when CA certificate file is missing or malformed2026-02-24ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary Two swallowed errors in `ClientAuthentication.provision()` cause mTLS client certificate authentication to silently fail open when a CA certificate file is missing, unreadable, or malformed. The server starts without error but accepts any client certificate signed by any system-trusted CA, completely bypassing the intended private CA trust boundary. ### Details In `modules/caddytls/connpolicy.go`, the `provision()` method has two `return nil` statements that should be `return err`: **Bug #1 — line 787:** ```go ders, err := convertPEMFilesToDER(fpath) if err != nil { return nil // BUG: should be "return err" } ``` **Bug #2 — line 800:** ```go err := caPool.Provision(ctx) if err != nil { return nil // BUG: should be "return err" } ``` Compare with line 811 which correctly returns the error: ```go caRaw, err := ctx.LoadModule(clientauth, "CARaw") if err != nil { return err // CORRECT } ``` When the error is swallowed on line 787, the chain is: 1. `TrustedCACerts` remains empty (no DER data appended from the file) 2. The `len(clientauth.TrustedCACerts) > 0` guard on line 794 is false — skipped 3. `clientauth.CARaw` is nil — line 806 returns nil 4. `clientauth.ca` remains nil — no CA pool was created 5. `provision()` returns nil — caller thinks provisioning succeeded Then in `ConfigureTLSConfig()`: 6. `Active()` returns true because `TrustedCACertPEMFiles` is non-empty 7. Default mode is set to `RequireAndVerifyClientCert` (line 860) 8. But `clientauth.ca` is nil, so `cfg.ClientCAs` is never set (line 867 skipped) 9. Go's `crypto/tls` with `RequireAndVerifyClientCert` + nil `ClientCAs` verifies client certs against the **system root pool** instead of the intended CA The fix is changing `return nil` to `return err` on lines 787 and 800. ### PoC 1. Configure Caddy with mTLS pointing to a nonexistent CA file: ``` { "apps": { "http": { "servers": { "srv0": { "listen": [":443"], "tls_connection_policies": [{ "client_authentication": { "trusted_ca_certs_pem_files": ["/nonexistent/ca.pem"] } }] } } } } } ``` 2. Start Caddy — it starts without any error or warning. 3. Connect with any client certificate (even self-signed): ```bash openssl s_client -connect localhost:443 -cert client.pem -key client-key.pem ``` 4. The TLS handshake succeeds despite the certificate not being signed by the intended CA. A full Go test that proves the bug end-to-end (including a successful TLS handshake with a random self-signed client cert) is here: https://gist.github.com/moscowchill/9566c79c76c0b64c57f8bd0716f97c48 Test output: ``` === RUN TestSwallowedErrorMTLSFailOpen BUG CONFIRMED: provision() swallowed the error from a nonexistent CA file. tls.Config has RequireAndVerifyClientCert but ClientCAs is nil. CRITICAL: TLS handshake succeeded with a self-signed client cert! The server accepted a client certificate NOT signed by the intended CA. --- PASS: TestSwallowedErrorMTLSFailOpen (0.03s) ``` ### Impact Any deployment using `trusted_ca_cert_file` or `trusted_ca_certs_pem_files` for mTLS will silently degrade to accepting any system-trusted client certificate if the CA file becomes unavailable. This can happen due to a typo in the path, file rotation, corruption, or permission changes. The server gives no indication that mTLS is misconfigured.

  • GO-2026-4539Caddy mTLS authentication fails open in github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v22026-02-26vendor · osvUS

    Caddy mTLS authentication fails open in github.com/caddyserver/caddy/v2

06

also known as (5)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-02-24modified 2026-06-17
08

references (10)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan