CVE-2026-27004
mediumpriority · track · 22EPSS 0.001 · 2 %ileDEEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-27
OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to version 2026.2.15, in some shared-agent deployments, OpenClaw session tools (`sessions_list`, `sessions_history`, `sessions_send`) allowed broader session targeting than some operators intended. This is primarily a configuration/visibility-scoping issue in multi-user environments where peers are not equally trusted. In Telegram webhook mode, monitor startup also did not fall back to per-account `webhookSecret` when only the account-level secret was configured. In shared-agent, multi-user, less-trusted environments: session-tool access could expose transcript content across peer sessions. In single-agent or trusted environments, practical impact is limited. In Telegram webhook mode, account-level secret wiring could be missed unless an explicit monitor webhook secret override was provided. Version 2026.2.15 fixes the issue.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
affected products (7)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (2)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- WID-SEC-W-2026-0441OpenClaw: Mehrere SchwachstellenDeutsch2026-02-17csaf · cert_bundDE
Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenClaw ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen und Daten zu manipulieren.
- GHSA-6hf3-mhgc-cm65OpenClaw session tool visibility hardening and Telegram webhook secret fallback2026-02-18ghsa · osvUS
## Vulnerability In some shared-agent deployments, OpenClaw session tools (`sessions_list`, `sessions_history`, `sessions_send`) allowed broader session targeting than some operators intended. This is primarily a configuration/visibility-scoping issue in multi-user environments where peers are not equally trusted. In Telegram webhook mode, monitor startup also did not fall back to per-account `webhookSecret` when only the account-level secret was configured. ## Typical Use Case Context Most regular OpenClaw deployments run a single agent, or run in trusted environments. In those setups, practical risk from this issue is generally low. ## Impact - Shared-agent, multi-user, less-trusted environments: session-tool access could expose transcript content across peer sessions. - Single-agent or trusted environments: practical impact is limited. - Telegram webhook mode: account-level secret wiring could be missed unless an explicit monitor webhook secret override was provided. ## Affected Packages / Versions - Package: npm `openclaw` - Affected versions: `<= 2026.2.14` - Patched version: `2026.2.15` (planned next release) ## Remediation - Add and enforce `tools.sessions.visibility` (`self | tree | agent | all`) across session tools, defaulting to `tree`. - Keep sandbox clamping behavior so sandboxed runs can be restricted to spawned/session-tree visibility. - Resolve Telegram webhook secret from account config fallback in monitor webhook startup. ## Fix Commit(s) - `c6c53437f7da033b94a01d492e904974e7bda74c` Thanks @aether-ai-agent for reporting.
also known as (3)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (7)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/c6c53437f7da033b94a01d492e904974e7bda74ccnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releasesPatchcnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-6hf3-mhgc-cm65cnnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/c6c53437f7da033b94a01d492e904974e7bda74cenisa_euvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-6hf3-mhgc-cm65enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/c6c53437f7da033b94a01d492e904974e7bda74cPatchnvd
- https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-6hf3-mhgc-cm65MitigationVendor Advisorynvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan