CVE-2026-19668

mediumpriority · track · 21EPSS 0.005 · 41 %ileDEFR
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.48% (41st) EPSS
CVSS 5.3 · medium
Is it mine?
13 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
2 sources
cert_bund · certfr

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

A BIND recursive resolver may experience excessive resource consumption if it encounters large numbers of a particular kind of invalid DNSSEC record. Default limits on "max-records-per-type" and "max-types-per-name" help mitigate the exposure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

5.3
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Lprimary · security-officer@isc.orgexploitability 3.9 · impact 1.4
v3.14.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (13)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (3)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

06

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-09-16modified 2026-10-26
07

references (3) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan