CVE-2026-12259

NLTK's package downloader in nltk/downloader.py does not verify file integrity after download and before extraction. The download flow at lines 789-825: 1. File is downloaded to a temp path via HTTP 2. os.replace(tmp_filepath, filepath) moves it to the final location (line 799) 3. Extraction begins via _unzip_iter() (line 825) Between steps 2 and 3, there is no SHA-256 verification. The checksum logic exists in _pkg_status() (lines 982-1015) but it is only used BEFORE download as a status check ("is this package already installed and up-to-date?"). It is never called after download to verify the file that was actually received. Attack vectors: 1. MITM during HTTP download (NLTK downloads from http:// by default on some mirrors) 2. Race condition on shared filesystems (attacker replaces file between os.replace and _unzip_iter) 3. DNS poisoning redirecting to attacker-controlled server PoC: ```python import nltk import unittest.mock import zipfile import io import os # Create a malicious zip that will be "downloaded" malicious_zip = io.BytesIO() with zipfile.ZipFile(malicious_zip, 'w') as zf: zf.writestr('punkt_tab/tokenizers/punkt_tab/english.pickle', b'MALICIOUS PAYLOAD - attacker controlled content') # Patch urllib to return our malicious zip with unittest.mock.patch('urllib.request.urlopen') as mock_urlopen: mock_response = unittest.mock.MagicMock() mock_response.read.return_value = malicious_zip.getvalue() mock_response.headers = {'Content-Length': str(len(malicious_zip.getvalue()))} mock_urlopen.return_value = mock_response # Download proceeds, no integrity check catches the swap # nltk.download('punkt_tab') # Would install attacker payload ``` This is distinct from CVE-2024-39705 (pickle deserialization via download) and CVE-2025-14009 (zip-slip path traversal). Those address what happens AFTER extraction. This finding addresses the gap BEFORE extraction where integrity is never verified. Suggested fix: After os.replace() and before _unzip_iter(), compute SHA-256 of the final file and compare against the expected checksum from the package index. Reject and delete the file if the hash does not match.

## Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-5wp5-5229-5g6q. This link is maintained to preserve external references. ## Original Description NLTK before 3.9.3 fails to verify file integrity after downloading packages and before extraction in the downloader module. Attackers can perform man-in-the-middle attacks or DNS poisoning to inject malicious package contents that are extracted without validation.

NLTK before 3.9.3 fails to verify file integrity after downloading packages and before extraction in the downloader module. Attackers can perform man-in-the-middle attacks or DNS poisoning to inject malicious package contents that are extracted without validation.

NLTK before 3.9.3 fails to verify file integrity after downloading packages and before extraction in the downloader module. Attackers can perform man-in-the-middle attacks or DNS poisoning to inject malicious package contents that are extracted without validation.

In nltk version 3.9.4, the `nltk.downloader.Downloader._download_package()` function writes downloaded package bytes to disk and may extract them before enforcing SHA-256 or MD5 checksum validation. This allows an attacker to tamper with the package response body for `info.url` through a compromised mirror, malicious proxy, or other source-substitution condition, leading to the installation of attacker-controlled package bytes. The vulnerability can result in malicious corpus or model content being trusted by downstream users or applications.