CVE-2026-115567

mediumpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.001 · 1 %ileUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.11% (1st) EPSS
CVSS 5.8 · medium
Is it mine?
1 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
1 sources
osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-28

Tokio is a runtime for writing applications with Rust. In 1.54.0, a race condition between tokio::time::Interval::poll_tick (including .tick().await) and the multi-threaded runtime's time driver could drop an internal timer entry without synchronizing with the driver thread that was firing it. The race caused a use-after-free on the timer's waker and task state in safe Rust, which could produce assertion panics, task reference-count corruption, or heap memory corruption. This issue is fixed in 1.54.1.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

5.8
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–medium · 1.9–5.8

v4.05.8mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · security-advisories@github.com
v4.01.9lowCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

03

affected products (1)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

04

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-5wjr-9356-4wc8Tokio: Race condition in `tokio::time::Interval`2026-10-23ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary On the multi-threaded runtime, there is a race condition between `Interval::poll_tick` and the runtime's time driver. This affects `Interval` only. `Sleep` and `Timeout` are **not** affected. ### Details In Tokio v1.54.0, a race condition between `tokio::time::Interval::poll_tick` (including `.tick().await`) and the runtime time driver can drop an internal timer entry without synchronizing with the driver thread that is firing it. This causes a data race and use-after-free on the timer's waker and task state in safe Rust, leading to assertion panics, task reference-count corruption, or heap memory corruption. This bug was introduced by https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio/pull/8458, and it was fixed by https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio/pull/8692. ### Impact This may lead to crashes and use-after-frees in applications using `Interval` on a multi-threaded runtime. Since this issue is known to lead to crashes in production systems, the v1.54.0 release of Tokio has been yanked. ### Credits Thank you to [creepycode](https://github.com/ByteZ1337) and [carabistouille](https://github.com/carabistouflette) for reporting this privately using the procedure outlined in our security policy. They both reported the issue independently of each other.

  • RUSTSEC-2026-0384Race condition in `tokio::time::Interval` on Tokio v1.54.02026-10-21vendor · osvUS

    ## Summary On the multi-threaded runtime, there is a race condition between `Interval::poll_tick` and the runtime's time driver. This affects `Interval` only. `Sleep` and `Timeout` are **not** affected. ## Details In Tokio v1.54.0, a race condition between `tokio::time::Interval::poll_tick` (including `.tick().await`) and the runtime time driver can drop an internal timer entry without synchronizing with the driver thread that is firing it. This causes a data race and use-after-free on the timer's waker and task state in safe Rust, leading to assertion panics, task reference-count corruption, or heap memory corruption. This bug was introduced by https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio/pull/8458, and it was fixed by https://github.com/tokio-rs/tokio/pull/8692. ## Impact This may lead to crashes and use-after-frees in applications using `Interval` on a multi-threaded runtime. Since this issue is known to lead to crashes in production systems, the v1.54.0 release of Tokio has been yanked. ## Credits Thank you to [creepycode](https://github.com/ByteZ1337) and [carabistouille](https://github.com/carabistouflette) for reporting this privately using the procedure outlined in our security policy. They both reported the issue independently of each other.

05

also known as (2)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

06

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-10-23modified 2026-10-23
08

references (6) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan