CVE-2025-64765

mediumpriority · track · 21EPSS 0.005 · 45 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.54% (45th) EPSS
CVSS 5.3 · medium
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · nvd · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Astro is a web framework. Prior to version 5.15.8, a mismatch exists between how Astro normalizes request paths for routing/rendering and how the application’s middleware reads the path for validation checks. Astro internally applies decodeURI() to determine which route to render, while the middleware uses context.url.pathname without applying the same normalization (decodeURI). This discrepancy may allow attackers to reach protected routes using encoded path variants that pass routing but bypass validation checks. This issue has been patched in version 5.15.8.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

6.9
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · low–medium · 2.7–6.9

v3.15.3mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.9 · impact 1.4
v4.06.9mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v4.06.9mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · security-advisories@github.com
v4.02.7lowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (1)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-ggxq-hp9w-j794Astro's middleware authentication checks based on url.pathname can be bypassed via url encoded values2025-11-19ghsa · osvUS

    A mismatch exists between how Astro normalizes request paths for routing/rendering and how the application’s middleware reads the path for validation checks. Astro internally applies `decodeURI()` to determine which route to render, while the middleware uses `context.url.pathname` without applying the same normalization (decodeURI). This discrepancy may allow attackers to reach protected routes (e.g., /admin) using encoded path variants that pass routing but bypass validation checks. https://github.com/withastro/astro/blob/ebc4b1cde82c76076d5d673b5b70f94be2c066f3/packages/astro/src/vite-plugin-astro-server/request.ts#L40-L44 ```js /** The main logic to route dev server requests to pages in Astro. */ export async function handleRequest({ pipeline, routesList, controller, incomingRequest, incomingResponse, }: HandleRequest) { const { config, loader } = pipeline; const origin = `${loader.isHttps() ? 'https' : 'http'}://${ incomingRequest.headers[':authority'] ?? incomingRequest.headers.host }`; const url = new URL(origin + incomingRequest.url); let pathname: string; if (config.trailingSlash === 'never' && !incomingRequest.url) { pathname = ''; } else { // We already have a middleware that checks if there's an incoming URL that has invalid URI, so it's safe // to not handle the error: packages/astro/src/vite-plugin-astro-server/base.ts pathname = decodeURI(url.pathname); // here this url is for routing/rendering } // Add config.base back to url before passing it to SSR url.pathname = removeTrailingForwardSlash(config.base) + url.pathname; // this is used for middleware context ``` Consider an application having the following middleware code: ```js import { defineMiddleware } from "astro/middleware"; export const onRequest = defineMiddleware(async (context, next) => { const isAuthed = false; // simulate no auth if (context.url.pathname === "/admin" && !isAuthed) { return context.redirect("/"); } return next(); }); ``` `context.url.pathname` is validated , if it's equal to `/admin` the `isAuthed` property must be true for the next() method to be called. The same example can be found in the official docs https://docs.astro.build/en/guides/authentication/ `context.url.pathname` returns the raw version which is `/%61admin` while pathname which is used for routing/rendering `/admin`, this creates a path normalization mismatch. By sending the following request, it's possible to bypass the middleware check ``` GET /%61dmin HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost:3000 ``` <img width="1920" height="1025" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e0eeecd-607a-4c73-b12e-5977a30c9bc4" /> **Remediation** Ensure middleware context has the same normalized pathname value that Astro uses internally, because any difference could allow it to bypass such checks. In short maybe something like this ```diff pathname = decodeURI(url.pathname); } // Add config.base back to url before passing it to SSR - url.pathname = removeTrailingForwardSlash(config.base) + url.pathname; + url.pathname = removeTrailingForwardSlash(config.base) + decodeURI(url.pathname); ``` Thank you, let @Sudistark know if any more info is needed. Happy to help :)

06

also known as (3)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2025-11-19modified 2026-10-18
08

references (8)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan