CVE-2025-4574

mediumpriority · track · 0EPSS 0.006 · 47 %ileDEEURUUS
grimoire priorityP3 · Track
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.56% (47th) EPSS
CVSS 6.5 · medium
Is it mine?
7 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · osv

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

In crossbeam-channel rust crate, the internal `Channel` type's `Drop` method has a race condition which could, in some circumstances, lead to a double-free that could result in memory corruption.

01

remediations

Vendor fix, mitigation, or workaround guidance, as published by each source.

A vendor fix is available.

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.aarch64 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.aarch64 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.ppc64le as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.ppc64le as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.s390x as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.s390x as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.x86_64 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.x86_64 as component of SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.aarch64 as component of openSUSE Leap 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.ppc64le as component of openSUSE Leap 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.s390x as component of openSUSE Leap 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

  • Fixedcargo-c-0:0.10.15-160000.1.1.x86_64 as component of openSUSE Leap 16.0suse_csaf

    To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".

02

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

6.5
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.16.5mediumAV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.16.5mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:Lsecondary · secalert@redhat.com USexploitability 3.9 · impact 2.5
v3.16mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
v3.15.6mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:Lsecondary · SUSE Product Security
03

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
04

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

05

affected products (7)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

06

advisories (4)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • SUSE-SU-2026:20096-1Security update for cargo-c2026-01-19csaf · suse_csafDE

    Security update for cargo-c

  • openSUSE-SU-2026:20060-1Security update for cargo-c2026-01-19csaf · suse_csafDE

    Security update for cargo-c

  • GHSA-pg9f-39pc-qf8gcrossbeam-channel Vulnerable to Double Free on Drop2025-04-10ghsa · osvUS

    The internal `Channel` type's `Drop` method has a race which could, in some circumstances, lead to a double-free. This could result in memory corruption. Quoting from the [upstream description in merge request \#1187](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1187#issue-2980761131): > The problem lies in the fact that `dicard_all_messages` contained two paths that could lead to `head.block` being read but only one of them would swap the value. This meant that `dicard_all_messages` could end up observing a non-null block pointer (and therefore attempting to free it) without setting `head.block` to null. This would then lead to `Channel::drop` making a second attempt at dropping the same pointer. The bug was introduced while fixing a memory leak, in upstream [MR \#1084](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1084), first published in 0.5.12. The fix is in upstream [MR \#1187](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1187) and has been published in 0.5.15

  • RUSTSEC-2025-0024crossbeam-channel: double free on Drop2025-04-08vendor · osvUS

    The internal `Channel` type's `Drop` method has a race which could, in some circumstances, lead to a double-free. This could result in memory corruption. Quoting from the [upstream description in merge request \#1187](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1187#issue-2980761131): > The problem lies in the fact that `dicard_all_messages` contained two paths that could lead to `head.block` being read but only one of them would swap the value. This meant that `dicard_all_messages` could end up observing a non-null block pointer (and therefore attempting to free it) without setting `head.block` to null. This would then lead to `Channel::drop` making a second attempt at dropping the same pointer. The bug was introduced while fixing a memory leak, in upstream [MR \#1084](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1084), first published in 0.5.12. The fix is in upstream [MR \#1187](https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/1187) and has been published in 0.5.15

07

also known as (7)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

08

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

09

references (12)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan