CVE-2025-34075

highrejectedpriority · track · 0OT risk · elevatedDEEURUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
— EPSS
CVSS 7.3 · high
Is it mine?
5 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
5 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · fstec_bdu · cert_bund

Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. Initially assigned to document an issues that allows guest VM to modify the host’s Vagrantfile via default synced folder, leading to host-side code execution. Rejected as CVE due to documented, intended behavior that does not violate a claimed security boundary.  https://developer.hashicorp.com/vagrant/docs/synced-folders

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.3
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode

v3.17.3highAV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsecondary · FSTEC (BDU) RU
02

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

03

affected products (5)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

04

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • WID-SEC-W-2025-1453Hashicorp Vagrant: Schwachstelle ermöglicht CodeausführungDeutsch2025-07-02csaf · cert_bundDE

    Ein lokaler Angreifer kann eine Schwachstelle in Hashicorp Vagrant ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen.

  • GHSA-hqp6-mjw3-f586HashiCorp Vagrant has code injection vulnerability through default synced folders2025-07-02ghsa · osvUS

    An authenticated virtual machine escape vulnerability exists in HashiCorp Vagrant versions 2.4.6 and below when using the default synced folder configuration. By design, Vagrant automatically mounts the host system’s project directory into the guest VM under /vagrant (or C:\vagrant on Windows). This includes the Vagrantfile configuration file, which is a Ruby script evaluated by the host every time a vagrant command is executed in the project directory. If a low-privileged attacker obtains shell access to the guest VM, they can append arbitrary Ruby code to the mounted Vagrantfile. When a user on the host later runs any vagrant command, the injected code is executed on the host with that user’s privileges. While this shared-folder behavior is well-documented by Vagrant, the security implications of Vagrantfile execution from guest-writable storage are not explicitly addressed. This effectively enables guest-to-host code execution in multi-tenant or adversarial VM scenarios.

05

also known as (4)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

06

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

07

references (5) cnnvd

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan