CVE-2025-30202

highpriority · track · 30EPSS 0.006 · 48 %ileEUUS
grimoire priorityP2 · Scheduled
Exploitable?
—
no known exploitation
Likely / severe?
0.60% (48th) EPSS
CVSS 7.5 · high
Is it mine?
3 products
Check your exposure
Who says so?
4 sources
cnnvd · enisa_euvd · osv · nvd

EPSS · scored 2026-10-27

vLLM is a high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs. Versions starting from 0.5.2 and prior to 0.8.5 are vulnerable to denial of service and data exposure via ZeroMQ on multi-node vLLM deployment. In a multi-node vLLM deployment, vLLM uses ZeroMQ for some multi-node communication purposes. The primary vLLM host opens an XPUB ZeroMQ socket and binds it to ALL interfaces. While the socket is always opened for a multi-node deployment, it is only used when doing tensor parallelism across multiple hosts. Any client with network access to this host can connect to this XPUB socket unless its port is blocked by a firewall. Once connected, these arbitrary clients will receive all of the same data broadcasted to all of the secondary vLLM hosts. This data is internal vLLM state information that is not useful to an attacker. By potentially connecting to this socket many times and not reading data published to them, an attacker can also cause a denial of service by slowing down or potentially blocking the publisher. This issue has been patched in version 0.8.5.

01

cvss

Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.

7.5
010

base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode⚠ sources disagree · medium–high · 6.9–7.5

v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hprimary · NVD / NIST USexploitability 3.9 · impact 3.6
v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsecondary · ENISA EU
v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsecondary · security-advisories@github.comexploitability 3.9 · impact 3.6
v3.17.5highCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsecondary · OSV
v3.16.9mediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H/E:Usecondary · CVSS-BT (t0sche)
02

ssvc

A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.

Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical Impact: partialcoordinatorcisa_ssvcUS
03

weaknesses

The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.

04

affected products (3)

Products and version ranges known to be affected.

05

advisories (2)

Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.

  • GHSA-9f8f-2vmf-885jData exposure via ZeroMQ on multi-node vLLM deployment2025-04-29ghsa · osvUS

    ### Impact In a multi-node vLLM deployment, vLLM uses ZeroMQ for some multi-node communication purposes. The primary vLLM host opens an `XPUB` ZeroMQ socket and binds it to ALL interfaces. While the socket is always opened for a multi-node deployment, it is only used when doing tensor parallelism across multiple hosts. Any client with network access to this host can connect to this `XPUB` socket unless its port is blocked by a firewall. Once connected, these arbitrary clients will receive all of the same data broadcasted to all of the secondary vLLM hosts. This data is internal vLLM state information that is not useful to an attacker. By potentially connecting to this socket many times and not reading data published to them, an attacker can also cause a denial of service by slowing down or potentially blocking the publisher. ### Detailed Analysis The `XPUB` socket in question is created here: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/c21b99b91241409c2fdf9f3f8c542e8748b317be/vllm/distributed/device_communicators/shm_broadcast.py#L236-L237 Data is published over this socket via `MessageQueue.enqueue()` which is called by `MessageQueue.broadcast_object()`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/device_communicators/shm_broadcast.py#L452-L453 https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/device_communicators/shm_broadcast.py#L475-L478 The `MessageQueue.broadcast_object()` method is called by the `GroupCoordinator.broadcast_object()` method in `parallel_state.py`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L364-L366 The broadcast over ZeroMQ is only done if the `GroupCoordinator` was created with `use_message_queue_broadcaster` set to `True`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L216-L219 The only case where `GroupCoordinator` is created with `use_message_queue_broadcaster` is the coordinator for the tensor parallelism group: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L931-L936 To determine what data is broadcasted to the tensor parallism group, we must continue tracing. `GroupCoordinator.broadcast_object()` is called by `GroupCoordinator.broadcoast_tensor_dict()`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L489 which is called by `broadcast_tensor_dict()` in `communication_op.py`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/communication_op.py#L29-L34 If we look at `_get_driver_input_and_broadcast()` in the V0 `worker_base.py`, we'll see how this tensor dict is formed: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/worker/worker_base.py#L332-L352 but the data actually sent over ZeroMQ is the `metadata_list` portion that is split from this `tensor_dict`. The tensor parts are sent via `torch.distributed` and only metadata about those tensors is sent via ZeroMQ. https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/54a66e5fee4a1ea62f1e4c79a078b20668e408c6/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L61-L83 ### Patches * https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/17197 ### Workarounds Prior to the fix, your options include: 1. Do not expose the vLLM host to a network where any untrusted connections may reach the host. 2. Ensure that only the other vLLM hosts are able to connect to the TCP port used for the `XPUB` socket. Note that port used is random. ### References * Relevant code first introduced in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/6183

  • PYSEC-2026-2016Data exposure via ZeroMQ on multi-node vLLM deployment2026-07-07vendor · osvUS

    ### Impact In a multi-node vLLM deployment, vLLM uses ZeroMQ for some multi-node communication purposes. The primary vLLM host opens an `XPUB` ZeroMQ socket and binds it to ALL interfaces. While the socket is always opened for a multi-node deployment, it is only used when doing tensor parallelism across multiple hosts. Any client with network access to this host can connect to this `XPUB` socket unless its port is blocked by a firewall. Once connected, these arbitrary clients will receive all of the same data broadcasted to all of the secondary vLLM hosts. This data is internal vLLM state information that is not useful to an attacker. By potentially connecting to this socket many times and not reading data published to them, an attacker can also cause a denial of service by slowing down or potentially blocking the publisher. ### Detailed Analysis The `XPUB` socket in question is created here: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/c21b99b91241409c2fdf9f3f8c542e8748b317be/vllm/distributed/device_communicators/shm_broadcast.py#L236-L237 Data is published over this socket via `MessageQueue.enqueue()` which is called by `MessageQueue.broadcast_object()`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/device_communicators/shm_broadcast.py#L452-L453 https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/device_communicators/shm_broadcast.py#L475-L478 The `MessageQueue.broadcast_object()` method is called by the `GroupCoordinator.broadcast_object()` method in `parallel_state.py`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L364-L366 The broadcast over ZeroMQ is only done if the `GroupCoordinator` was created with `use_message_queue_broadcaster` set to `True`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L216-L219 The only case where `GroupCoordinator` is created with `use_message_queue_broadcaster` is the coordinator for the tensor parallelism group: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L931-L936 To determine what data is broadcasted to the tensor parallism group, we must continue tracing. `GroupCoordinator.broadcast_object()` is called by `GroupCoordinator.broadcoast_tensor_dict()`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L489 which is called by `broadcast_tensor_dict()` in `communication_op.py`: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/distributed/communication_op.py#L29-L34 If we look at `_get_driver_input_and_broadcast()` in the V0 `worker_base.py`, we'll see how this tensor dict is formed: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/790b79750b596043036b9fcbee885827fdd2ef3d/vllm/worker/worker_base.py#L332-L352 but the data actually sent over ZeroMQ is the `metadata_list` portion that is split from this `tensor_dict`. The tensor parts are sent via `torch.distributed` and only metadata about those tensors is sent via ZeroMQ. https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/54a66e5fee4a1ea62f1e4c79a078b20668e408c6/vllm/distributed/parallel_state.py#L61-L83 ### Patches * https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/17197 ### Workarounds Prior to the fix, your options include: 1. Do not expose the vLLM host to a network where any untrusted connections may reach the host. 2. Ensure that only the other vLLM hosts are able to connect to the TCP port used for the `XPUB` socket. Note that port used is random. ### References * Relevant code first introduced in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/6183

06

also known as (6)

Other names and identifiers for this entity.

07

sources

Which sources assert this record, and when.

published 2025-04-30modified 2026-06-17
08

references (10)

External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.

scry

Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.

Free scan