CVE-2025-25296
mediumpriority · track · 11EPSS 0.019 · 80 %ileexploit · PoCEUUSEPSS · scored 2026-10-28
Label Studio is an open source data labeling tool. Prior to version 1.16.0, Label Studio's `/projects/upload-example` endpoint allows injection of arbitrary HTML through a `GET` request with an appropriately crafted `label_config` query parameter. By crafting a specially formatted XML label config with inline task data containing malicious HTML/JavaScript, an attacker can achieve Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). While the application has a Content Security Policy (CSP), it is only set in report-only mode, making it ineffective at preventing script execution. The vulnerability exists because the upload-example endpoint renders user-provided HTML content without proper sanitization on a GET request. This allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in victims' browsers by getting them to visit a maliciously crafted URL. This is considered vulnerable because it enables attackers to execute JavaScript in victims' contexts, potentially allowing theft of sensitive data, session hijacking, or other malicious actions. Version 1.16.0 contains a patch for the issue.
cvss
Technical severity, 0–10. One row per scoring source.
base score 0–10 · higher = more severe · hover a vector to decode
ssvc
A stakeholder decision — act, attend, or track — from exploitation and impact.
weaknesses
The CWE weakness classes this flaw belongs to.
exploits (1)
Public proof-of-concept and weaponised exploit code.
affected products (3)
Products and version ranges known to be affected.
advisories (2)
Vendor and ecosystem advisories describing this.
- GHSA-wpq5-3366-mqw4Label Studio allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via GET request to `/projects/upload-example` endpoint2025-02-14ghsa · osvUS
## Description Label Studio's `/projects/upload-example` endpoint allows injection of arbitrary HTML through a `GET` request with an appropriately crafted `label_config` query parameter. By crafting a specially formatted XML label config with inline task data containing malicious HTML/JavaScript, an attacker can achieve Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). While the application has a Content Security Policy (CSP), it is only set in report-only mode, making it ineffective at preventing script execution. The vulnerability exists because the upload-example endpoint renders user-provided HTML content without proper sanitization on a GET request. This allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in victims' browsers by getting them to visit a maliciously crafted URL. This is considered vulnerable because it enables attackers to execute JavaScript in victims' contexts, potentially allowing theft of sensitive data, session hijacking, or other malicious actions. ## Steps to reproduce 1. Create a malicious label config that includes an XSS payload in embedded task data: ```xml <View><!-- {"data": {"text": "<div><img src=x onerror=eval(atob(`YWxlcnQoIlhTUyIp`))></div>"}} --><HyperText name="text" value="$text"/></View> ``` 2. URL encode the payload and access the following URL: - http://app/projects/upload-example/?label_config=%3CView%3E%3C!--%20{%22data%22:%20{%22text%22:%20%22%3Cdiv%3E%3Cimg%20src=x%20onerror=eval(atob(`YWxlcnQoIlhTUyIp`))%3E%3C/div%3E%22}}%20--%3E%3CHyperText%20name=%22text%22%20value=%22$text%22/%3E%3C/View%3E When executed, the payload causes the application to render an HTML page containing an img tag that fails to load, triggering the onerror event handler which executes base64-decoded JavaScript, demonstrating successful XSS execution in the victim's browser. ## Mitigations - Enable the Content Security Policy in enforcement mode instead of report-only mode to actively block unauthorized script execution - Deprecate the `GET` behavior at the `example-config` endpoint since it's not used ## Impact The vulnerability requires no special privileges and can be exploited by getting a victim to visit a crafted URL. The impact is high as it allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in victims' browsers, potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling account takeover through session theft.
- PYSEC-2026-1504Label Studio allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via GET request to `/projects/upload-example` endpoint2026-07-07vendor · osvUS
## Description Label Studio's `/projects/upload-example` endpoint allows injection of arbitrary HTML through a `GET` request with an appropriately crafted `label_config` query parameter. By crafting a specially formatted XML label config with inline task data containing malicious HTML/JavaScript, an attacker can achieve Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). While the application has a Content Security Policy (CSP), it is only set in report-only mode, making it ineffective at preventing script execution. The vulnerability exists because the upload-example endpoint renders user-provided HTML content without proper sanitization on a GET request. This allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in victims' browsers by getting them to visit a maliciously crafted URL. This is considered vulnerable because it enables attackers to execute JavaScript in victims' contexts, potentially allowing theft of sensitive data, session hijacking, or other malicious actions. ## Steps to reproduce 1. Create a malicious label config that includes an XSS payload in embedded task data: ```xml <View><!-- {"data": {"text": "<div><img src=x onerror=eval(atob(`YWxlcnQoIlhTUyIp`))></div>"}} --><HyperText name="text" value="$text"/></View> ``` 2. URL encode the payload and access the following URL: - http://app/projects/upload-example/?label_config=%3CView%3E%3C!--%20{%22data%22:%20{%22text%22:%20%22%3Cdiv%3E%3Cimg%20src=x%20onerror=eval(atob(`YWxlcnQoIlhTUyIp`))%3E%3C/div%3E%22}}%20--%3E%3CHyperText%20name=%22text%22%20value=%22$text%22/%3E%3C/View%3E When executed, the payload causes the application to render an HTML page containing an img tag that fails to load, triggering the onerror event handler which executes base64-decoded JavaScript, demonstrating successful XSS execution in the victim's browser. ## Mitigations - Enable the Content Security Policy in enforcement mode instead of report-only mode to actively block unauthorized script execution - Deprecate the `GET` behavior at the `example-config` endpoint since it's not used ## Impact The vulnerability requires no special privileges and can be exploited by getting a victim to visit a crafted URL. The impact is high as it allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in victims' browsers, potentially exposing sensitive data or enabling account takeover through session theft.
also known as (6)
Other names and identifiers for this entity.
sources
Which sources assert this record, and when.
references (9)
External citations — patches, advisories, analysis.
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2025-25296cnnvd
- https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/commit/8cf6958e1e27ef6a03ed287e674470975d340885cnnvd
- https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/releases/tag/1.16.0Patchcnnvd
- https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/security/advisories/GHSA-wpq5-3366-mqw4cnnvd
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-25296cnnvd
- https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/commit/8cf6958e1e27ef6a03ed287e674470975d340885enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/security/advisories/GHSA-wpq5-3366-mqw4enisa_euvd
- https://github.com/HumanSignal/label-studio/commit/8cf6958e1e27ef6a03ed287e674470975d340885Patchnvd
Attackers weaponise vulnerabilities like this against internet-exposed services. See what is exposed on your perimeter with a free passive scan.
Free scan